cycloneye wrote:Is not yet D-MAX and this is how it looks.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn-l.jpg
Wow is all I can say.
Isn't this a nice change from TD 2, Bonnie, Colin, and TD 5?!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cycloneye wrote:Is not yet D-MAX and this is how it looks.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn-l.jpg
Let's not get too excited here - the center is still towards the eastern edge of that convective burst, Danielle's still getting her legs under her. Heat content would seem to be a little low, and shear is probably too high at this point as well for RI. I think some garden-variety strengthening will do for now.Ptarmigan wrote:Based on the satellite presentation, I think Danielle is undergoing rapid intensification. I think we could see Hurricane Danielle by tomorrow. I notice rapid intensification happens at night. Opal, Katrina, Rita, Wilma, and Ike underwent rapid intensification at night.
thetruesms wrote:Let's not get too excited here - the center is still towards the eastern edge of that convective burst, Danielle's still getting her legs under her. Heat content would seem to be a little low, and shear is probably too high at this point as well for RI. I think some garden-variety strengthening will do for now.
I will definitely give you that for the Atlantic this yearPtarmigan wrote:I am not overtly excited. I just think it looks better than other storms I have seen this year.
thetruesms wrote:I will definitely give you that for the Atlantic this year
Bustedbob rulz wrote:Well it doesn't look better than Alex yet.
thetruesms wrote:Bustedbob rulz wrote:Well it doesn't look better than Alex yet.![]()
Although Alex wasn't particularly attractive either until the very end, with its frequent dry air moats. I do hope that Danielle will be prettier when her opportunity comes.
dixiebreeze wrote:Looking a bit more westerly: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-rb.html
SeminoleWind wrote:dixiebreeze wrote:Looking a bit more westerly: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-rb.html
looks to go a bit south of the forecast points also wonder if its just a short term wobble
Air Force Met wrote:I made a call...yesterday I think...its a re-curver. That is my opinion based on the models and climo (adding climo tracks with the short term upper air progs which should be fairly accurate). Given the trof that should be there...climo would indicate this is a recurver.
dixiebreeze wrote:SeminoleWind wrote:dixiebreeze wrote:Looking a bit more westerly: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-rb.html
looks to go a bit south of the forecast points also wonder if its just a short term wobble
Might be a bit more than a wobble.
dixiebreeze wrote:SeminoleWind wrote:dixiebreeze wrote:Looking a bit more westerly: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-rb.html
looks to go a bit south of the forecast points also wonder if its just a short term wobble
Might be a bit more than a wobble.
jaxfladude wrote:So, will Danielle be the biggest and strongest system for this season?
Hopefully she misses any and all landmass/islands.
Cyclenall wrote:Not surprised to see people discussing track more than the strength for this even though long before this formed I knew this had no chance at a US direct hit. Why is there even a debate?
Air Force Met wrote:I made a call...yesterday I think...its a re-curver. That is my opinion based on the models and climo (adding climo tracks with the short term upper air progs which should be fairly accurate). Given the trof that should be there...climo would indicate this is a recurver.
Just yesterday?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests