That's because they had to be right. They were just dying for a feather in their proverbial caps that they were mistaking for credibility. You remember the old line about the light at the end of the tunnel? Yeah, it was a freight train. We'll be at Named Storm #11 within a day or two (September 14/15/16). That's not bad considering we're probably still going to see another 4 or 5 named storms (conservatively) by the end of October. Certainly some were paranoid about hyper-activity and others were prognosticating on about what is wrong with this season blah blah blah blah blah. The latter was ignorant because instead of following along with the obvious - western basin biased, late blooming, > average ACE, # of storms, etc. that were obvious signs of where we were headed, they had to keep harping on the then and now (e.g. all those "upper level lows - 2010 the season of upper level lows!" ) All the while, certain posters

Oh and Sanibel, I doubt seriously anyone was referring to you. You've always been one of the best posters on the site. I read everything you put out there. But there were others who maybe are spending more time doing homework (grades 8-10 no doubt).
