May 2011: inactive, why?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34001
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
May 2011: inactive, why?
What a difference a month makes! April was insane, yet May so far has been mostly tranquil at least from the severe weather side (and that is good news too for the flood victims with not much new rainfall).
My speculative reasoning is that the drought in the southern Plains has been zapping any moisture potential and limiting the activity in what would otherwise be the heart of severe weather this month. I see no reason why that won't continue. I think Tornado Alley this year will seriously disappoint for tornado chasers (and please for emergency mangement), at least from Kansas and Nebraska south.
But come June, activity normally shifts north into the Upper Midwest where it has still been moist. So maybe June will be bad as well?
My speculative reasoning is that the drought in the southern Plains has been zapping any moisture potential and limiting the activity in what would otherwise be the heart of severe weather this month. I see no reason why that won't continue. I think Tornado Alley this year will seriously disappoint for tornado chasers (and please for emergency mangement), at least from Kansas and Nebraska south.
But come June, activity normally shifts north into the Upper Midwest where it has still been moist. So maybe June will be bad as well?
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 11430
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
- Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
- Contact:
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34001
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
It kinda reminds me of 2005 vs. 2006 from a hurricane perspective. We went from an insane 2005 to a mostly tranquil 2006.
The drought was there too before the storms, but Tornado Alley for the most part was not getting them. Western Oklahoma and all of Kansas and Nebraska were pretty quiet. And that is the prime area in May. All the activity potential was set up for the warm Gulf and across Dixie Alley (with some in the Midwest). The ridge has blocked those areas, and put the sharp line in Tornado Alley which is being zapped by the drought.
The drought was there too before the storms, but Tornado Alley for the most part was not getting them. Western Oklahoma and all of Kansas and Nebraska were pretty quiet. And that is the prime area in May. All the activity potential was set up for the warm Gulf and across Dixie Alley (with some in the Midwest). The ridge has blocked those areas, and put the sharp line in Tornado Alley which is being zapped by the drought.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
Re: May 2011: inactive, why?
I wouldn't let my guard down yet. After the 1974 Super Outbreak, Oklahoma had a significant outbreak in June 1974.
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.
0 likes
Re: May 2011: inactive, why?
HurricaneBill wrote:
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.
The weather channel is...
Just think, if the gov't sponsored a year round vortex 3 project, we could basically eliminate tornadoes.
0 likes
Re: May 2011: inactive, why?
RL3AO wrote:HurricaneBill wrote:
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.
The weather channel is...
Just think, if the gov't sponsored a year round vortex 3 project, we could basically eliminate tornadoes.
I don't think we should mess with nature even more than we already do. We wouldn't know the effects of what we would have done until it would be too late. Always got to remember, we live in natures world, not the other way around.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34001
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: May 2011: inactive, why?
HurricaneBill wrote:I wouldn't let my guard down yet. After the 1974 Super Outbreak, Oklahoma had a significant outbreak in June 1974.
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.
Very true, things can change in a heartbeat. June also moves the activity farther north, and the flooding and wet winter and early spring there means the atmosphere is very juicy.
0 likes
- tomboudreau
- Category 5
- Posts: 1869
- Age: 48
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 6:07 pm
- Location: Carnegie, PA
- Contact:
Re: May 2011: inactive, why?
Florida1118 wrote:RL3AO wrote:HurricaneBill wrote:
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.
The weather channel is...
Just think, if the gov't sponsored a year round vortex 3 project, we could basically eliminate tornadoes.
I don't think we should mess with nature even more than we already do. We wouldn't know the effects of what we would have done until it would be too late. Always got to remember, we live in natures world, not the other way around.
What he means is that for the first year of V2 (Spring of 09), there were very limited opportunities for severe wx to pop up in their targetted area. He isn't saying that we should mess with nature. V2 spent most of the time the first year chasing nothing.
0 likes
Re: May 2011: inactive, why?
Florida1118 wrote:RL3AO wrote:HurricaneBill wrote:
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.
The weather channel is...
Just think, if the gov't sponsored a year round vortex 3 project, we could basically eliminate tornadoes.
I don't think we should mess with nature even more than we already do. We wouldn't know the effects of what we would have done until it would be too late. Always got to remember, we live in natures world, not the other way around.
Vortex project wasn't some cloud seeding thing. It was a research mission and when it started, severe weather basically shut down for almost 3 weeks. Almost like mother nature didn't want us to learn her secrets....
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
Re: May 2011: inactive, why?
RL3AO wrote:Vortex project wasn't some cloud seeding thing. It was a research mission and when it started, severe weather basically shut down for almost 3 weeks. Almost like mother nature didn't want us to learn her secrets....
A watched pot never boils.
0 likes
- Stephanie
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23843
- Age: 62
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
- Location: Glassboro, NJ
Re: May 2011: inactive, why?
RL3AO wrote:HurricaneBill wrote:
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.
The weather channel is...
Just think, if the gov't sponsored a year round vortex 3 project, we could basically eliminate tornadoes.
I was surprised that they were out in MAY instead of April. I realize it takes a lot of planning and May is their designated month, but they must've had a sinking feeling inside when everything was happening in April.
0 likes
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 33
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
There was a fundamental pattern shift from a progressive to a blocky regime around the end of the month. This has bottled up the jet stream and as a result the systems this month have been high-amplitude, closed, and/or detached from sources of jet energy. These types of systems tend to produce less tornadoes.
The drought hurt the Plains a lot in April when many systems picked up an anomalously dry mixed layer that capped things off there. As Crazy mentioned this may have contributed to a more active severe season to the east; when the mixed layer weakened to levels that were "just right" (i.e. what is more usual for the Plains) to the east in the Southeast and the Carolinas, Plains-like supercells developed there. But so far this month the drought has made no noticeable impact and in fact if anything the cap has been too weak in the Plains - the systems might just have not been dynamic enough to pick up a warm mixed layer to cap things off.
The drought hurt the Plains a lot in April when many systems picked up an anomalously dry mixed layer that capped things off there. As Crazy mentioned this may have contributed to a more active severe season to the east; when the mixed layer weakened to levels that were "just right" (i.e. what is more usual for the Plains) to the east in the Southeast and the Carolinas, Plains-like supercells developed there. But so far this month the drought has made no noticeable impact and in fact if anything the cap has been too weak in the Plains - the systems might just have not been dynamic enough to pick up a warm mixed layer to cap things off.
0 likes
- somethingfunny
- ChatStaff
- Posts: 3926
- Age: 36
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
- Location: McKinney, Texas
Re: May 2011: inactive, why?
HurricaneBill wrote:RL3AO wrote:Vortex project wasn't some cloud seeding thing. It was a research mission and when it started, severe weather basically shut down for almost 3 weeks. Almost like mother nature didn't want us to learn her secrets....
A watched pot never boils.
Exactly LOL!
0 likes
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.
Return to “USA & Caribbean Weather”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane and 55 guests