May 2011: inactive, why?

U.S. & Caribbean Weather Discussions and Severe Weather Events

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

May 2011: inactive, why?

#1 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue May 17, 2011 10:54 pm

What a difference a month makes! April was insane, yet May so far has been mostly tranquil at least from the severe weather side (and that is good news too for the flood victims with not much new rainfall).

My speculative reasoning is that the drought in the southern Plains has been zapping any moisture potential and limiting the activity in what would otherwise be the heart of severe weather this month. I see no reason why that won't continue. I think Tornado Alley this year will seriously disappoint for tornado chasers (and please for emergency mangement), at least from Kansas and Nebraska south.

But come June, activity normally shifts north into the Upper Midwest where it has still been moist. So maybe June will be bad as well?
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#2 Postby JonathanBelles » Wed May 18, 2011 12:48 am

Is it possible that the last even (the big one) zapped all of the energy from the atmosphere? I don't know if the atmosphere has a reserve like that. I certainly do think the drought has something to do with it, but that was there before the storms, so it cannot be all of the cause.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#3 Postby RL3AO » Wed May 18, 2011 6:56 am

The blocking ridge over the central US is going to kill most chances of severe weather over the Central Plains.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#4 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed May 18, 2011 8:44 am

It kinda reminds me of 2005 vs. 2006 from a hurricane perspective. We went from an insane 2005 to a mostly tranquil 2006.

The drought was there too before the storms, but Tornado Alley for the most part was not getting them. Western Oklahoma and all of Kansas and Nebraska were pretty quiet. And that is the prime area in May. All the activity potential was set up for the warm Gulf and across Dixie Alley (with some in the Midwest). The ridge has blocked those areas, and put the sharp line in Tornado Alley which is being zapped by the drought.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: May 2011: inactive, why?

#5 Postby HurricaneBill » Wed May 18, 2011 9:30 pm

I wouldn't let my guard down yet. After the 1974 Super Outbreak, Oklahoma had a significant outbreak in June 1974.

With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: May 2011: inactive, why?

#6 Postby RL3AO » Wed May 18, 2011 9:45 pm

HurricaneBill wrote:
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.


The weather channel is...

Just think, if the gov't sponsored a year round vortex 3 project, we could basically eliminate tornadoes.
0 likes   

Florida1118

Re: May 2011: inactive, why?

#7 Postby Florida1118 » Wed May 18, 2011 10:28 pm

RL3AO wrote:
HurricaneBill wrote:
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.


The weather channel is...

Just think, if the gov't sponsored a year round vortex 3 project, we could basically eliminate tornadoes.

I don't think we should mess with nature even more than we already do. We wouldn't know the effects of what we would have done until it would be too late. Always got to remember, we live in natures world, not the other way around.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: May 2011: inactive, why?

#8 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed May 18, 2011 10:43 pm

HurricaneBill wrote:I wouldn't let my guard down yet. After the 1974 Super Outbreak, Oklahoma had a significant outbreak in June 1974.

With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.


Very true, things can change in a heartbeat. June also moves the activity farther north, and the flooding and wet winter and early spring there means the atmosphere is very juicy.
0 likes   

User avatar
tomboudreau
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1869
Age: 48
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 6:07 pm
Location: Carnegie, PA
Contact:

Re: May 2011: inactive, why?

#9 Postby tomboudreau » Thu May 19, 2011 6:03 am

Florida1118 wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
HurricaneBill wrote:
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.


The weather channel is...

Just think, if the gov't sponsored a year round vortex 3 project, we could basically eliminate tornadoes.

I don't think we should mess with nature even more than we already do. We wouldn't know the effects of what we would have done until it would be too late. Always got to remember, we live in natures world, not the other way around.


What he means is that for the first year of V2 (Spring of 09), there were very limited opportunities for severe wx to pop up in their targetted area. He isn't saying that we should mess with nature. V2 spent most of the time the first year chasing nothing.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: May 2011: inactive, why?

#10 Postby RL3AO » Thu May 19, 2011 8:01 am

Florida1118 wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
HurricaneBill wrote:
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.


The weather channel is...

Just think, if the gov't sponsored a year round vortex 3 project, we could basically eliminate tornadoes.

I don't think we should mess with nature even more than we already do. We wouldn't know the effects of what we would have done until it would be too late. Always got to remember, we live in natures world, not the other way around.


Vortex project wasn't some cloud seeding thing. It was a research mission and when it started, severe weather basically shut down for almost 3 weeks. Almost like mother nature didn't want us to learn her secrets....
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: May 2011: inactive, why?

#11 Postby HurricaneBill » Thu May 19, 2011 4:09 pm

RL3AO wrote:Vortex project wasn't some cloud seeding thing. It was a research mission and when it started, severe weather basically shut down for almost 3 weeks. Almost like mother nature didn't want us to learn her secrets....


A watched pot never boils.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 62
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

Re: May 2011: inactive, why?

#12 Postby Stephanie » Thu May 19, 2011 7:47 pm

RL3AO wrote:
HurricaneBill wrote:
With how quiet it has gotten, you'd think Vortex2 was out there or something.


The weather channel is...

Just think, if the gov't sponsored a year round vortex 3 project, we could basically eliminate tornadoes.


I was surprised that they were out in MAY instead of April. I realize it takes a lot of planning and May is their designated month, but they must've had a sinking feeling inside when everything was happening in April.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#13 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu May 19, 2011 9:58 pm

There was a fundamental pattern shift from a progressive to a blocky regime around the end of the month. This has bottled up the jet stream and as a result the systems this month have been high-amplitude, closed, and/or detached from sources of jet energy. These types of systems tend to produce less tornadoes.

The drought hurt the Plains a lot in April when many systems picked up an anomalously dry mixed layer that capped things off there. As Crazy mentioned this may have contributed to a more active severe season to the east; when the mixed layer weakened to levels that were "just right" (i.e. what is more usual for the Plains) to the east in the Southeast and the Carolinas, Plains-like supercells developed there. But so far this month the drought has made no noticeable impact and in fact if anything the cap has been too weak in the Plains - the systems might just have not been dynamic enough to pick up a warm mixed layer to cap things off.
0 likes   

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 36
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re: May 2011: inactive, why?

#14 Postby somethingfunny » Sat May 21, 2011 3:48 am

HurricaneBill wrote:
RL3AO wrote:Vortex project wasn't some cloud seeding thing. It was a research mission and when it started, severe weather basically shut down for almost 3 weeks. Almost like mother nature didn't want us to learn her secrets....


A watched pot never boils.


Exactly LOL!
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#15 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun May 22, 2011 8:41 pm

And that tranquil period...just went up in smoke.
0 likes   


Return to “USA & Caribbean Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 43 guests