ATL: EMILY - Remnants

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
StormClouds63
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 583
Age: 61
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Southwest Louisiana

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#281 Postby StormClouds63 » Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:56 pm

This one could be the next Dean (2007) ... or the next Earl (2004). Too early to tell, though it looks impressive size-wise.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#282 Postby SouthDadeFish » Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:56 pm

Looking at RGB imagery it seems inflow has gotten stronger as the day has progressed. This deserves a code red in my book. Only thing missing from being a tropical depression is convection over the center.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#283 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:58 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
All we need is some decent convection and this is a TD. Im still sticking with late tomorrow for upgrade because it is moving into a much more favorable environment too support organized convection. the multiple vorts will not be a problem if enough convection build. IT will consolidate very quick.


Problem is the other vort is quite well defined as well, its got SW winds and I've seen these types of systems really struggle to take off...once they do they tend to explode in a big way but if it doesn't then the ECM probably would be a reasonable solution, IE weak, maybe eventually weak TS into the Windwards and through the Caribbean...My odds on the first option!

I have few doubts this does develop, its already too well organised for it to pull a ECM and weaken from here onwards...GFS IMO is a good solution for the track.

Should go to 50% IMO, code red not out of the question either...convection developing...mind you strong convection right over the eastern vort as well which probably isn't helping to create one main center...

PS, when I say take off, I mean with regards to getting past TD status...
Last edited by KWT on Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#284 Postby Sanibel » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:01 pm

Looks like a hurricane brewing to me.
0 likes   

shaggy
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 655
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: greenville, n.c.

Re: Re:

#285 Postby shaggy » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:02 pm

KWT wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
All we need is some decent convection and this is a TD. Im still sticking with late tomorrow for upgrade because it is moving into a much more favorable environment too support organized convection. the multiple vorts will not be a problem if enough convection build. IT will consolidate very quick.


Problem is the other vort is quite well defined as well, its got SW winds and I've seen these types of systems really struggle to take off...once they do they tend to explode in a big way but if it doesn't then the ECM probably would be a reasonable solution, IE weak, maybe eventually weak TS into the Windwards and through the Caribbean...My odds on the first option!

I have few doubts this does develop, its already too well organised for it to pull a ECM and weaken from here onwards...GFS IMO is a good solution for the track.

Should go to 50% IMO, code red not out of the question either...

PS, when I say take off, I mean with regards to getting past TD status...



Looking at the RGB loop it appears that the spin on the east side has slowly opened up over the last couple of hours. Doesn't seem nearly as pronounced as earlier and now the western spin which I guess is around 10N and 44W is looking better and firing convection?
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re:

#286 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:03 pm

Frank2 wrote:There are many differing opinions here but per wxman57's quote it does seem the most likely scenario will be a recurve because of the well-advertised trough that is forceast to deepen off the EC in the next 3-5 days...

True, 91L could remain weak and move westward, but looking at it this afternoon it does seem to be evolving at an average rate, so possible in 2 or 3 days it will be at TD status and begin to feel the weakness to it's north...

Frank

Which makes me wonder about the credibility of the weather folks(NHC?) that were saying
that this year systems should go more west and not recurve....
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#287 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:04 pm

shaggy wrote:Looking at the RGB loop it appears that the spin on the east side has slowly opened up over the last couple of hours. Doesn't seem nearly as pronounced as earlier and now the western spin which I guess is around 10N and 44W is looking better and firing convection?


I actually think its gotten better, the eastern one is right under the convection at the moment, looks like thats forming an MLC as well.

Eastern one is between 38-40W, 8-10N...slap bang in the deep convection.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

HurricaneWarning92
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)

#288 Postby HurricaneWarning92 » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:08 pm

:uarrow: Agree. they were saying this year we will see more landfalls or at least it was expected, now apparently that trough is still there... :roll:
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#289 Postby SouthDadeFish » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:08 pm

I see the center near 9.5W 42.5W.
0 likes   

shaggy
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 655
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: greenville, n.c.

Re: Re:

#290 Postby shaggy » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:10 pm

KWT wrote:
shaggy wrote:Looking at the RGB loop it appears that the spin on the east side has slowly opened up over the last couple of hours. Doesn't seem nearly as pronounced as earlier and now the western spin which I guess is around 10N and 44W is looking better and firing convection?


I actually think its gotten better, the eastern one is right under the convection at the moment, looks like thats forming an MLC as well.

Eastern one is between 38-40W, 8-10N...slap bang in the deep convection.



I was looking at the naked swirl that was just east of western circ and that is the one that has faded away and opened up. I see the one you are speaking of and it is looking ok for now. The question is what happens if these 2 systems get enough seperation between them? The western one is really moving while the one you note is moving more NNW and a little slower.

P.S the NHC listed the little naked swirl that I think is opening up as the primary 1008 low at 9n 41w.
Last edited by shaggy on Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#291 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:11 pm

Remember people, one system that hasn't formed yet doesn't mean its a recurve season, that would be massivly foolish to think that at this stage.

Remember even in busy landfalling seasons, most will still recurve, its pretty rare to get a year like 2004 or even like 2008 where most hit.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

StormClouds63
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 583
Age: 61
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Southwest Louisiana

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#292 Postby StormClouds63 » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:12 pm

This system has the potential to be much more than just a "rain-maker." It will be a blessing if it does do the re-curve, especially if it avoids the islands.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#293 Postby KWT » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:12 pm

That would be the question...ECM is the only one I can see that takes that route...the western vort still develops, but takes quite alot longer to get going. That's my best guess as to what would happen as well.

Its a classic monsoonal system, never satisified with just one center 8-)

Ps, that being said, I actually DO agree with Aric that there is a fair chance this forms some point tomorrow, too much going for it...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re:

#294 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:14 pm

KWT wrote:Remember people, one system that hasn't formed yet doesn't mean its a recurve season, that would be massivly foolish to think that at this stage.

Remember even in busy landfalling seasons, most will still recurve, its pretty rare to get a year like 2004 or even like 2008 where most hit.



KWT We are reacting to the anticipated troughiness more than anything else....
as opposed to a persistent blocking high....

I'm mainly blaming the media more than anything else.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#295 Postby gatorcane » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:25 pm

TAFB:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#296 Postby SouthDadeFish » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:27 pm

:uarrow: No possible tropical cyclone listed there. Interesting.
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#297 Postby Macrocane » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:28 pm

Are we really sure that there's a well defined LLC? I have been looking at visible imagery and I see a couple of vortices that may be eddies, vort max or something but not a LLC yet, of course I'm not a pro so I could be wrong. The mid level rotation is good anyway.
Last edited by Macrocane on Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

HurricaneWarning92
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)

Re: Re:

#298 Postby HurricaneWarning92 » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:29 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:
KWT wrote:Remember people, one system that hasn't formed yet doesn't mean its a recurve season, that would be massivly foolish to think that at this stage.

Remember even in busy landfalling seasons, most will still recurve, its pretty rare to get a year like 2004 or even like 2008 where most hit.



KWT We are reacting to the anticipated troughiness more than anything else....


i understand that not every single storm will make landfall somewhere in the U.S. In fact, i expect quite a few will recurve, but i also think quite a few will pose some threat. Im not saying that i wish some catastrophic event to occur, like we saw in 2005 but i will admit i like the "thrill" when a hurricane is coming my way, as im sure many of us here think that way, but of course that along with nervousness. The word "recurve" irritates me because we've heard that a lot these past 2 years, and id like a bit of a change so its more "interesting", thus thrilling. i mean how many of you think that way? im pretty sure im not the only one...
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 31
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re:

#299 Postby Evil Jeremy » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:30 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote::uarrow: No possible tropical cyclone listed there. Interesting.


Also it dropped the Low.

EDIT: My bad, thought that was present conditions, not 72 hours out.
Last edited by Evil Jeremy on Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143871
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#300 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:30 pm

The 18z surface analysis.

Image

Uploaded by imageshack,us
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests