ROCK wrote:yeah Port....I saw the 384HR GFS....nasty run..
Hey Rock could you post that Link please. Much thanks...

Moderator: S2k Moderators
ROCK wrote:yeah Port....I saw the 384HR GFS....nasty run..
northtxboy wrote:ROCK wrote:yeah Port....I saw the 384HR GFS....nasty run..
Hey Rock could you post that Link please. Much thanks...
dwsqos2 wrote:I don't care about ridges; I only care about genesis. And, the Euro has a 1005 mb low east of Honduras at hour 96.
Portastorm wrote:northtxboy wrote:ROCK wrote:yeah Port....I saw the 384HR GFS....nasty run..
Hey Rock could you post that Link please. Much thanks...
Here's a link:
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/gfs/12/images/gfs_ten_360l.gif
Portastorm wrote:northtxboy wrote:ROCK wrote:yeah Port....I saw the 384HR GFS....nasty run..
Hey Rock could you post that Link please. Much thanks...
Here's a link:
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/gfs/12/images/gfs_ten_360l.gif
wxman57 wrote:So far, HWRF has been a joke of a model. It can't come close to replacing the GFDL yet.
KWT wrote:wxman57 wrote:So far, HWRF has been a joke of a model. It can't come close to replacing the GFDL yet.
Its been awful, and to be fair the GFDL hasn't been great either. May do better once there is actually a few systems develop a proper low level circulation!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests