Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I'm going to have to disagree with the latest NHC discussion, the strength is
not 45 knots and it looks like it has slowed more than 2 knots. The reasoning given did not make sense either, recon was in there hours ago and didn't even get a chance to sample much. Since recon left for some unknown reason, it has gotten much better organized. Not only that, but only showing 65 knots at 72 hours seems very risky in terms of being too slow. It wouldn't surprise me if it was only 10 knots away from that value presently. I won't get into the weakening at 120 hours as that has to do with land interaction. I agree with the track forecast however, maybe a bit more north.
NHC Discussion wrote:SLOW STRENGTHENING IS FORECAST DURING THE NEXT COUPLE OF
DAYS.
Risky.
wxman57 wrote:00Z model guidance shifted well to the west, no more turn northward to the NE Gulf, except for the wacky GFDL. All other tracks point at upper TX coast or south to MX.
Hilarious, when all indications are pointing to the opposite. The NHC forecast also gave that guidance a giant middle finger.
Joe Bastardi wrote:@BigJoeBastardi
Convective blow up over Ernesto may be dry entrainment bursting, we will know tomorrow I have seen this many times, may not be what u think
So how is that cold summer coming along Joe?
ozonepete wrote:Thank you! Dry air is not involved at this point. And you can know this if you use the correct data to analyze dry air at MID-LEVELS. Dry air in the upper layers has no bearing on Tropical Cyclone development or sustenance. Only dry air at MID-LEVELS matters. I have tried so hard to get this point across here but always wind up having to say it over and over again. Let me try one more time.
Yeah its going to take a lot of work to undo everyone's habit at using the upper layer WV for how moist the environment is for a TC because that image is readily available and most people didn't know about mid-level WV similar to mid-level wind shear. Up until now its been many years of that other map being used all the time for dry air spotting. Heck, I just found that out not too long ago as well. I do have one question, does the upper level WV have
any affect on forming TC's or established TC's?