ATL: ISAAC - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Dueling Lows..the Norm in Gulf it seems. But I believe there have been 2 Low centers within that large center thingy
Think hey fight until too tired -then join. It takes lot fuel ( moisture in feeding) to keep 2 engines humming together
If slows and 2 Lows get in goove together - Storm could Be Huge!!
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-bd.html
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Think hey fight until too tired -then join. It takes lot fuel ( moisture in feeding) to keep 2 engines humming together
If slows and 2 Lows get in goove together - Storm could Be Huge!!
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-bd.html
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7351
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re:
deltadog03 wrote:WOW!! Recon just punched the center.....The LLC Looks like its gotten sucked into the MLC NE....Short term for the models for get about it!!!!
This may cause it to go much farther east than forecast, I wouldn't let your guard down from texas to New Orleans, but the relocation of the center could make this a Florida Panhandle landfall
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 194
- Age: 37
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:05 pm
- Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
WxGuy1 wrote:BlueIce wrote:The newest RBTOP product seems to show what everyone has been hinting at for the last couple of
Just for the record, is RBTOP really a new product? The image says IR Ch. 4, which is the traditional longwave IR channel (wavelength of 10.7 micrometers). Unless I'm mistaken, the "RBTOP" is really just an image of the same longwave infrared channel but with a different color-table. On the satellite floater page, there are several different color-tables available. So, the actual data are the exact same as those shown using the AVN color-table, for example, but the colors associated with the data are different. The color table may or may not make a particular feature easier to see... In this case, I think it does make it easier to see, largely because it has many more colors than most of the other IR color-scales (note how the transition from one shade of a color to another is very smooth using the RBTOP color-table).
By newest I meant current as of 04:45 GMT. But yes RBTOP is handy to see the highest cold cloud tops by the darker shading.
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Miami, Florida
How far away and in what direction is the new center from the old one?
Last edited by fasterdisaster on Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2263
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
- Location: Pensacola, Florida
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
BlueIce wrote:WxGuy1 wrote:BlueIce wrote:The newest RBTOP product seems to show what everyone has been hinting at for the last couple of
Just for the record, is RBTOP really a new product? The image says IR Ch. 4, which is the traditional longwave IR channel (wavelength of 10.7 micrometers). Unless I'm mistaken, the "RBTOP" is really just an image of the same longwave infrared channel but with a different color-table. On the satellite floater page, there are several different color-tables available. So, the actual data are the exact same as those shown using the AVN color-table, for example, but the colors associated with the data are different. The color table may or may not make a particular feature easier to see... In this case, I think it does make it easier to see, largely because it has many more colors than most of the other IR color-scales (note how the transition from one shade of a color to another is very smooth using the RBTOP color-table).
By newest I meant current as of 04:45 GMT. But yes RBTOP is handy to see the highest cold cloud tops by the darker shading.
Aaaah. I misunderstood. Carry on, then!

Last edited by WxGuy1 on Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- SEASON_CANCELED
- Category 3
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:17 am
- Location: 8 Bit Charlie Sheen
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Now
it
Gets
Fun...this will effect forecast
it
Gets
Fun...this will effect forecast
0 likes
i am a big stupid ugly moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt stinks and i like to kiss my own butt
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
- Location: Ft. Collins, CO
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Meteorcane wrote:Quick question how do the Wisconsin charts measure Vorticity. I know that when given wind components and horizontal spacing Vorticity is dv/dx - du/dy, my question is how do they get there wind components to plug into that equation? Remote measurements, surface measurements, UA measurements, interpolation? I ask because I want to know just how accurate these charts are for vorticity (especially UL vorticity)
I actually don't know. I generally look at model analysis anyway if I'm interested in taking a quick look at vorticity fields. For that matter, the vorticity on those CIMSS charts might be based on a particular model analysis.
0 likes
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Losing its arms and legs..A big round thingy rolls to Big Easy? Or loops arpoun Gulf. BIZARRE Storm indeed
0 likes
- Meteorcane
- Category 2
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 6:49 am
- Location: North Platte Nebraska
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
ncweatherwizard wrote:Meteorcane wrote:Quick question how do the Wisconsin charts measure Vorticity. I know that when given wind components and horizontal spacing Vorticity is dv/dx - du/dy, my question is how do they get there wind components to plug into that equation? Remote measurements, surface measurements, UA measurements, interpolation? I ask because I want to know just how accurate these charts are for vorticity (especially UL vorticity)
I actually don't know. I generally look at model analysis anyway if I'm interested in taking a quick look at vorticity fields. For that matter, the vorticity on those CIMSS charts might be based on a particular model analysis.
Ah yes that would make sense, and I have at least a rudimentary understanding of how models determine initial parameter values.
Last edited by Meteorcane on Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Yeah go figure.. i was just saying a few min ago that I was not sure why it had not reformed or got pulled up there yet.. guess I spoke to soon !
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
According to the wundermap on wundergound that allows you to superimpose the cone on the satellite...if center is where it looks it's currently outside the north edge of the cone.
Still defer to mets...would this effect track? My thought are it could put it further nortn quicker perhaps allowing it to feel the weakness more than gfs sees.
Still defer to mets...would this effect track? My thought are it could put it further nortn quicker perhaps allowing it to feel the weakness more than gfs sees.
Last edited by PTPatrick on Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re:
deltadog03 wrote:WOW!! Recon just punched the center.....The LLC Looks like its gotten sucked into the MLC NE....Short term for the models for get about it!!!!
I saw recon making that turn and head north once it was obvious there was no windshift along the previous coc track. I was wondering what they'd find further NW!
Do we have a VDM yet?
Edited to correct direction.
Last edited by WxEnthus on Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- Disclaimer: Posts herein are my amateur opinion only and should not be used for making important decisions. Defer to the NHC, NWS, and local authorities for official guidance.
- TwisterFanatic
- Category 5
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma
Don't think it's actually that much farther north of the original center.
I maybe wrong though.
I maybe wrong though.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7351
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re: Re:
WxEnthus wrote:deltadog03 wrote:WOW!! Recon just punched the center.....The LLC Looks like its gotten sucked into the MLC NE....Short term for the models for get about it!!!!
I saw recon making that turn and head north once it was obvious there was no windshift along the previous coc track. I was wondering what they'd find further NE!
Do we have a VDM yet?
Its possible that recon has been following an eddy for the last couple of hours
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Re:
TwisterFanatic wrote:Don't think it's actually that much farther north of the original center.
I maybe wrong though.
It's a LOT further NW of the old center...by about 60-70 miles. It's a short term motion of about 30 mph. The LLC just got sucked up...
0 likes
- tropicwatch
- Category 5
- Posts: 3391
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
- Location: Panama City Florida
- Contact:
According to my google map ruler it is approximately 60 miles NW of the last reported center.
0 likes
Tropicwatch
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Miami, Florida
- TwisterFanatic
- Category 5
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma
Re: Re:
Air Force Met wrote:TwisterFanatic wrote:Don't think it's actually that much farther north of the original center.
I maybe wrong though.
It's a LOT further NW of the old center...by about 60-70 miles. It's a short term motion of about 30 mph. The LLC just got sucked up...
Ah, I see. Somebody said NE and it got me confused.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest