Wikipedia writers?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#21 Postby RL3AO » Thu Jul 04, 2013 1:27 pm

Wasn't really looking for it. Just replying to Aric. Plus I don't need too much help finding stuff on wiki. I'm quite familiar with it.
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 28
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: Wikipedia writers?

#22 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:57 pm

Hate to rekindle this flame...not really. :lol:

I've never agreed with removing the section. It's very useful to the weather community.

Hurricanehink wrote:
Alyono wrote:
Hurricanehink wrote:
But there is no source for the actual ACE value for individual storms.


Its called use the given formula, cite it, and make the simple calculation. That is NOT original research! In the science community, that would be considered review and not new research (you're not using the ACE formula for a calculation that is not widely used... ACE is widely used)

If that is considered wrong, the Wiki TC project is a bunch of Pharisees... more worried about the rules than worried about providing the best service. It mkaes as little sense as does the NWS directive to not use wind data to determine tornado wind speeds


I didn't say anything about original research. I just said that we don't have a source for the individual values.

We don't need one if WP:CALC applies (states that a source is not needed if the calculations needed are basic), which it does.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Wikipedia writers?

#23 Postby Hurricanehink » Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:20 pm

Let's get back on topic. There's still a need for writers. If anyone is interested, feel free to let us know.
0 likes   

Meow

#24 Postby Meow » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:33 am

I am a Wikipedia writer, also called Meow. I have rewritten Typhoon Megi (2010), Cyclone Gafilo, Typhoon Jangmi (2008), Typhoon Damrey (2012), and Typhoon Jelawat (2012). I also have contributed many high-resolution pictures from NASA with a strict name.

Some remarkable pictures:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File ... _0515Z.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File ... _0245Z.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File ... -09-01.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File ... _0235Z.jpg
0 likes   

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

#25 Postby somethingfunny » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:24 am

I'm not much of a Wikipedia editor, but I figured I should let y'all know that I spotted some errors while searching for historical major hurricane landfalls along Florida's East Coast. For example, it lists Elena and Katrina as Category 3's striking Florida, and includes Frances.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Fl ... hurricanes
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#26 Postby Hammy » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:31 am

looks like for Frances somebody got the kts and mph values confused...
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re:

#27 Postby somethingfunny » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:36 am

Hammy wrote:looks like for Frances somebody got the kts and mph values confused...


Ah! It happens. :) I believe the list is missing Dora from 1964 (hit Jacksonville) as well. This kind of information comes in handy when people start asking why all the major hurricanes have been missing Florida's East Coast recently. If I'm not mistaken, since 1950, only King, Dora, Betsy, Andrew, and Jeanne (and Donna if you include the Keys) have struck Florida from the east as Category 3 or higher. It's less common than many believe, although a buffet line of them struck in the 1940s.
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#28 Postby Hammy » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:40 am

Was Isbell in 1964 a 2 or 3 in Florida? I've seen (both official in fact) different answers on it.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re: Wikipedia writers?

#29 Postby somethingfunny » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:49 am

Until the reanalysis project reaches the 1960s, this "preliminary tropical cyclone report" released on December 17 1964 will have to be the official word on Isbell:

http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/hurrica ... h81964.pdf

...And it is quite inconclusive. :x The first quote is merely an operational bulletin issued and archived, and the second quote is from the single-page summary written a few months later, and only lists official ground observations which are frequently not representative of the storm's maximum winds:

ISBELLS INTENSITY HAS REMAINED ABOUT THE SAME DURING THE PAST FEW HOURS AND HIGHEST WINDS ARE ESTIMATED 100 TO 125 MPH OVER A SMALL
AREA NEAR THE CENTER.
THE INTENSE PORTION OF THE HURRICANE IS VERY SMALL AND THE DESTRUCTIVE WINDS ARE CONFINED TO THE WALL CLOUD
AREA IMMEDIATELY AROUND THE EYE. THE BROAD ARC OF THE LEADING EDGE IS APPROACHING THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AREA NORTHWEST AND SOUTH
OF EVERGLADES CITY.
AT 3 PM EST THE CEmER OF HURRICANE ISBELL WAS NEAR LATITUDE 25.6 NORTH LONGITUDE 81.6 WEST OR ABOUT 30 MILES SOUTHWEST OF
EVERGLADES CITY AND 90 MILES WEST OF MIAMI. IT IS MOVING ON A SLIGHTLY ZIGZAG PATH TOWARD THE NORTHEAST AT ABOUT 15 MPH.


The center of Hurricane Isbell entered Florida near Everglades City at 4:lO p.m. EST October 14th and
exited in the Jupiter-Juno Beach area 9 p.m. of the same day. This represented a northeastward movement
averaging 23 mph while over southern Florida. The center passed some 47 miles to the northwest of Miami
where peak gusts were 63 mph and the lowest pressure 29.54 inches. Highest winds were near 90 mph along
both Florida coasts
with the lowest pressure at Juno Beach, 28.88 inches, and at Jupiter 28.95 inches.


Given that the NHC lists "100-125 mph", my speculation is that sustained winds were in the 100mph Cat2 range, while some gusts up to 125mph may have been recorded by the reconnaissance plane, but that's just my hunch.
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#30 Postby Hammy » Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:36 am

So apparently the NHC doesn't seem any more certain than I am.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

#31 Postby Yellow Evan » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:40 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane_Luis
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 723
Age: 27
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:14 pm
Location: Tiptree, Essex, United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Wikipedia writers?

#32 Postby Hurricane_Luis » Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:10 pm

Hurricanehink wrote:Let's get back on topic. There's still a need for writers. If anyone is interested, feel free to let us know.


Just made an account on Wikipedia username same as it is here (Hurricane Luis). Been looking for spelling mistakes in articles and updating current storm info.. I'd be happy to help further. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re:

#33 Postby somethingfunny » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:21 pm

Yellow Evan wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Isbell_1964_track.png

it's a 3


This thread is discussing the difficulties in finding accurate sources to use for Wikipedia articles and you used Wikipedia as a source to answer the discussion?

I went to the map you linked, followed it back to the Hurricane Isbell article, then followed the source for its' intensity, and guess what that noaa.gov webpage ( http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/ush ... 512007.txt ) says?

1964 Oct FL, SW2, SE2 2 974 ----- Isbell
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: Re:

#34 Postby Yellow Evan » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:54 pm

somethingfunny wrote:
Yellow Evan wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Isbell_1964_track.png

it's a 3


This thread is discussing the difficulties in finding accurate sources to use for Wikipedia articles and you used Wikipedia as a source to answer the discussion?

I went to the map you linked, followed it back to the Hurricane Isbell article, then followed the source for its' intensity, and guess what that noaa.gov webpage ( http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/ush ... 512007.txt ) says?

1964 Oct FL, SW2, SE2 2 974 ----- Isbell


That map is based off of HURDAT, all maps are. Or at least the old pre-2013 version of the database.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: Wikipedia writers?

#35 Postby supercane4867 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:18 pm

I made a new colorful image for Hurricane Nora(1997) replaced the original blurry one

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Nora_(1997)
Last edited by supercane4867 on Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: Wikipedia writers?

#36 Postby Yellow Evan » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:49 pm

supercane4867 wrote:I made a new colorful image for Hurricane Nora(1997) replaced with the original blurry one

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Nora_(1997)


Thanks.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: Wikipedia writers?

#37 Postby supercane4867 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 4:05 pm

Yellow Evan wrote:
supercane4867 wrote:I made a new colorful image for Hurricane Nora(1997) replaced with the original blurry one

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Nora_(1997)


Thanks.


My goal is to make large colorized images for every pacific hurricanes that still lack one.

Here are newly made images of Odile(1990) and Kevin(1991)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hurricane_Odile(1990).jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hurricane_Kevin(1991).jpg
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: Wikipedia writers?

#38 Postby Yellow Evan » Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:04 pm

supercane4867 wrote:
Yellow Evan wrote:
supercane4867 wrote:I made a new colorful image for Hurricane Nora(1997) replaced with the original blurry one

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Nora_(1997)


Thanks.


My goal is to make large colorized images for every pacific hurricanes that still lack one.

Here are newly made images of Odile(1990) and Kevin(1991)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hurricane_Odile(1990).jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hurricane_Kevin(1991).jpg


Well, that's physically impossible. Once you get into the 1970's, all you have is black and white images. And prior to midway through the 1961 PHS, you have 0 images :P
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: Wikipedia writers?

#39 Postby supercane4867 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:19 pm

Yellow Evan wrote:Well, that's physically impossible. Once you get into the 1970's, all you have is black and white images. And prior to midway through the 1961 PHS, you have 0 images :P


Add Remark: for the ones with available HURSAT data :P
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane_Luis
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 723
Age: 27
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:14 pm
Location: Tiptree, Essex, United Kingdom
Contact:

#40 Postby Hurricane_Luis » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:11 pm

0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: duilaslol and 26 guests