ATL: GABRIELLE - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#281 Postby Sanibel » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:30 pm

Looks like the type that will re-burst after outrunning its convection.
0 likes   

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#282 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:35 pm

NDG wrote:
blp wrote:Oscat pass. Looks good. Still elongated but tighter than earlier.

http://imageshack.us/a/img819/3928/7my1.jpg


That looks tight enough to me, though it missed most of the western quadrant of the disturbance.

Tight enough for what?
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2811
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#283 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:42 pm

@USTropics I'm just pointing out that if the top experts in the world, with all their many & various tools, do not know for sure if this'll be a major, then how the heck can anyone on this board say they do?
0 likes   

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#284 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:46 pm

Still feeling the EC storm vibe :D
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2079
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re:

#285 Postby Blinhart » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:48 pm

txwxpirate wrote:You can't go wrong if you say: Its not coming to Texas. Other than that, its up for grabs if it develops.


I don't think anyone will agree with you on this, especially this year when nothing has gone the way it was suppose to go.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145307
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#286 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:51 pm

Sun going down. Focus seems just east of Martinique.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re:

#287 Postby USTropics » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:53 pm

Hybridstorm_November2001 wrote:@USTropics I'm just pointing out that if the top experts in the world, with all their many & various tools, do not know for sure if this'll be a major, then how the heck can anyone on this board say they do?


Oh yea, I'm completely agreeing with you. I was just adding to your thoughts that the models have especially been poor this year in particular. Case in point, the ECMWF and GFS wanted to shred this system to pieces by the ULL (and still do). While the ULL has induced shear over 97L, it's helped create the convection 97L has been lacking prior in the MDR/Atlantic, which has helped sustain a healthy low level vorticity despite a sheared UL environment.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#288 Postby SouthDadeFish » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:55 pm

While convection is waning as can be expected with this time of day, I'm noticing improving outflow to the south of the system.
0 likes   

hurricanes1234
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2907
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago

Re:

#289 Postby hurricanes1234 » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:57 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:While convection is waning as can be expected with this time of day, I'm noticing improving outflow to the south of the system.


When is the Diurnal Maximum and Diurnal Minimum? I'm fairly new to this.
0 likes   
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

#290 Postby SFLcane » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:57 pm

Still don't see much substantial inflow at low levels with 97L.Wouldn't be surprised if all convection poofs. IR imagery at the moment is certainly not one of a developing TC in my opinion.

In 2013 systems cant hold convection for more then 2hrs it seems.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re:

#291 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:00 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:While convection is waning as can be expected with this time of day, I'm noticing improving outflow to the south of the system.


This may be the beginning of a tropical cyclone and in this case looking ahead this may be the first interesting system of the season, the path will probably be anywhere from Pensacola to Miami to possibly even the Outer Banks depending on how strong the trough is and where its located and of course how strong 97L is

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#292 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:01 pm

hurricanes1234 wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:While convection is waning as can be expected with this time of day, I'm noticing improving outflow to the south of the system.


When is the Diurnal Maximum and Diurnal Minimum? I'm fairly new to this.

DMIN peaks around sunset and DMAX peaks around sunrise.
0 likes   

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Re:

#293 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:05 pm

TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:
hurricanes1234 wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:While convection is waning as can be expected with this time of day, I'm noticing improving outflow to the south of the system.


When is the Diurnal Maximum and Diurnal Minimum? I'm fairly new to this.

DMIN peaks around sunset and DMAX peaks around sunrise.

The basics are DMIN wanes convection and DMAX waxes it :wink:
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

#294 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:09 pm

The MLC and surface low seem to be stacking, instead of being 2 degrees apart they are like 1 degree apart now, once they stack we may have a problem developing in the Caribbean

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes   

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re:

#295 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:09 pm

SFLcane wrote:Still don't see much substantial inflow at low levels with 97L.Wouldn't be surprised if all convection poofs. IR imagery at the moment is certainly not one of a developing TC in my opinion.

In 2013 systems cant hold convection for more then 2hrs it seems.

Whaddya mean? Has plenty of convection with it. Looks like a developing TC to me.
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#296 Postby Sanibel » Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:10 pm

cycloneye wrote:Sun going down. Focus seems just east of Martinique.




You can see it on Visible Floater.


Should burst a new center later tonight.
Last edited by Sanibel on Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: Re:

#297 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:12 pm

HurricaneDREW92 wrote:
SFLcane wrote:Still don't see much substantial inflow at low levels with 97L.Wouldn't be surprised if all convection poofs. IR imagery at the moment is certainly not one of a developing TC in my opinion.

In 2013 systems cant hold convection for more then 2hrs it seems.

Whaddya mean? Has plenty of convection with it. Looks like a developing TC to me.


What I think it means is that and indication of good inflow would be banding and moisture from a moist source which this has very little of ATM but that could quickly change

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes   

ninel conde

#298 Postby ninel conde » Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:20 pm

http://www.atmos.washington.edu/images/ ... 012145.gif

its taken the shape of an inverted V, not healthy for the convection east of 60. whatever refires tonight is likely to be west of the islands.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#299 Postby jinftl » Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:21 pm

The key will be if the convection can organize - it has not to the point yet where the NHC is giving it a 60% chance as of 2pm of not developing in the next 48 hours. Convection does not equal a developing and organizing system necessarily - we have had huge thunderstorms over the Florida straits and Bahamas over 85 degree water and that does not mean they are developing the internal structure of a tropical system.

A couple of things do merit attention to this system:

1) location - this is not a wave just moving off the coast of Africa. This is in the 120 hour window of possibly being a threat to Florida and a threat to Hispanola and Cuba sooner

2) MJO pulse - long-talked about as finally kick-starting the Atlantic, we may be seeing the evidence of that with 97L

3) Shear is not off the charts unfavorable and is expected to lessen down the road

4) TCHP - if a system wanted to do a cycle of 'roids to boost it's strength, the waters between Jamaica, Cuba, and the Yucatan would be the place to do it

5) we've got little else to look at so why not turn this into the 'one' we've been waiting for

I would like to see all the main models on board before getting too excited though
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: Re:

#300 Postby vbhoutex » Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:25 pm

HurricaneDREW92 wrote:
SFLcane wrote:Still don't see much substantial inflow at low levels with 97L.Wouldn't be surprised if all convection poofs. IR imagery at the moment is certainly not one of a developing TC in my opinion.

In 2013 systems cant hold convection for more then 2hrs it seems.

Whaddya mean? Has plenty of convection with it. Looks like a developing TC to me.

I totally agree. The convection is still displaced well East of the surface low. Not much inflow evident at the lower levels as stated also. IMO this one is still struggling. That is not to say it isn't causing problems in the islands, but I do not think is on the verge of becoming a TD at all.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests