ATL: INGRID - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#261 Postby GCANE » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:05 am

F-16 showing very high rain rate. GOES-13 showing excellent cirrus development from it with some possible gravity waves.

Looks like we have ignition.

Image

Image
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#262 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:08 am

Recon scheduled for takeoff in two hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#263 Postby GCANE » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:52 am

Anti-cyclone developing to the south

Image
0 likes   


User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#265 Postby GCANE » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:57 am

Rolling up

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#266 Postby GCANE » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:59 am

Here we go, hot tower firing up. IMHO all signs RI underway.


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#267 Postby ROCK » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:05 am

:uarrow: agree looks like it doesnt want to waste any time....models still have this fairly weak at this point...
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#268 Postby GCANE » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:05 am

Overshooting tops continuing to fire off with more pronounced gravity waves in the cirrus canopy.

Textbook CDO building.


Image
0 likes   

djmikey
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#269 Postby djmikey » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:10 am

:?: Just curious. I know everyone is discussing "landfall" location, but what will the storm do AND go after landfall? Will she continue west? Will she turn northward? And can we expect ANY moisture from her in TX AFTER landfall? All I have read is her possible landfall location and nothing on where she will go after landfall. Many tropical systems create havoc of flooding rains days after they have made landfall. Just wondring if we can POSSIBLY expect a piece of her later down the road. Thanks!
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#270 Postby tailgater » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:18 am

:uarrow: To early to tell as some models keep her down there for 3 to 5 days and I doubt anyone will stick thier neck out in forecasting for 5 days in such weak steering currents
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

JGrin87
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:06 am
Location: Houston, Texas

#271 Postby JGrin87 » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:25 am

Could the ULL in S. Tx. pull this thing poleward?
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#272 Postby tailgater » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:28 am

GCANE wrote:Here we go, hot tower firing up. IMHO all signs RI underway.


http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/htdocs_dyn_a ... xico.0.jpg


Yes if thier is a LLC under that Vigous MLC then it will be deepening quickly, but I don't see any clear indications at the surface yet.
Looks pretty good on radar. :eek:
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Big O
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 252
Age: 54
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:40 pm
Location: McAllen, Texas

Re:

#273 Postby Big O » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:45 am

JGrin87 wrote:Could the ULL in S. Tx. pull this thing poleward?


Possible. I believe that is what happened with Bret (1999).
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4225
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#274 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:48 am

Would a more intense system move further north in this case?
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#275 Postby Alyono » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:54 am

tailgater wrote:
GCANE wrote:Here we go, hot tower firing up. IMHO all signs RI underway.


http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/htdocs_dyn_a ... xico.0.jpg


Yes if thier is a LLC under that Vigous MLC then it will be deepening quickly, but I don't see any clear indications at the surface yet.
Looks pretty good on radar. :eek:


surface obs indicate that is where the surface center is
0 likes   

JGrin87
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:06 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#276 Postby JGrin87 » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:55 am

Alyono wrote:
tailgater wrote:
GCANE wrote:Here we go, hot tower firing up. IMHO all signs RI underway.


http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/htdocs_dyn_a ... xico.0.jpg


Yes if thier is a LLC under that Vigous MLC then it will be deepening quickly, but I don't see any clear indications at the surface yet.
Looks pretty good on radar. :eek:


surface obs indicate that is where the surface center is


Please expand...
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#277 Postby GCANE » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:58 am

The ULL along the coast of TX was shooting some PV down into the BOC.

Scrolling thru the 3hr frames on 200mb vorticity, looks like the PV anomaly may be dissipating some what near 93L.

If so, that will help it to spin up.

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/windmain.php?&basin=atlantic&sat=wg8&prod=vor1&zoom=&time=
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#278 Postby GCANE » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:00 am

Core heating up to 1C, but not yet symmetrical around the estimated COC.

Or; could be the estimate is wrong.

Image
Last edited by GCANE on Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 60% - 80%

#279 Postby Alyono » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:00 am

JGrin87 wrote:
Please expand...


southwest winds from the coast of Mexico. There is a LLC
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

#280 Postby HurriGuy » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:00 am

I know we are dealing with this system now, but have you guys noticed that GFS keeps pressures low all throughout the month of September in the Gulf and Western Carribbean? This might be a reoccuring theme. It is hinting at a couple more GOM systems this month, but without the ridge blocking all these storms.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest