blp wrote:GeneratorPower wrote:I don't know about you pro-mets, but I'm starting to look only at the Euro for genesis and general pattern recognition.
Let me tell you if I was not so into watching the tropics I would not bother with any other model. Outside of professionals and our group of enthusiasts who want to track the genesis process their really is no reason to show the public any other model because once it does have a system properly initialized it is rock solid and proven time and time again to be the most reliable with track. Cristobal was a perfect example when all the other models were flopping it stayed consistent.
Do I need to post the Debby loop again?

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2012/graphics/al04/loop_3W.shtml
Ironically only the GFS had the track correct in this case, and this was only 2 years ago. The euro may be more accurate in more situations but anyone that relies on a single model will get burned IMO. They all have weaknesses, sometimes known and sometimes unknown. We seem to have a short term memory when a model does well for a few storms. IMO
