ATL: EARL - Remnants - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Regardless of development, atleast we have something to talk about. I'm not a pro met but these favorable conditions so far especially in the eastern Caribbean has to mean something as for as the remainder of the season.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Alyono wrote:With the ridging to the north, the initialization does not matter for the Gulf
Where is may pose an issue is for the intensity forecast into Belize. May keep it far enough north so that stays far enough away from Honduras to intensify.
Also, I have noticed that during the past 15 years, the models usually have a TC that turns too far north in the Caribbean and Gulf this time of year. This issue started with Chantal in 2001
That goes against the grain of what i have learned on this board and others, that is where a storm initializes does not matter because of ridging.
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Yellow Evan wrote:Seems to becoming more organized. But where is the center?
66W and 16.5N
0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
perk wrote:Alyono wrote:With the ridging to the north, the initialization does not matter for the Gulf
Where is may pose an issue is for the intensity forecast into Belize. May keep it far enough north so that stays far enough away from Honduras to intensify.
Also, I have noticed that during the past 15 years, the models usually have a TC that turns too far north in the Caribbean and Gulf this time of year. This issue started with Chantal in 2001
That goes against the grain of what i have learned on this board and others, that is where a storm initializes does not matter because of ridging.
If there was a weakness it could be of more significance. In the sense if there is a strengthening ridge, it is a block and a storm can only go so far north. If the ridge is weaker or displaced then that could change.
0 likes
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Initialization matters in cases like Joaquin where small differences mean different weather features influence the track.
When you have the southern edge of a large ridge at say 20N, it doesn't matter if the models initialize the center at 16 or 14N. The storm cannot go north of 20N in either instance
When you have the southern edge of a large ridge at say 20N, it doesn't matter if the models initialize the center at 16 or 14N. The storm cannot go north of 20N in either instance
1 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23691
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Alyono, I agree I don't think initialization matters here. The ridge over the Gulf is strong and all of the global models are factoring that in pretty well and consequently are keeping this well south of the U.S...if anything they have trended even more south into Central America and Mexico.
2 likes
- AJC3
- Admin
- Posts: 3999
- Age: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
tarheelprogrammer wrote:Yellow Evan wrote:Seems to becoming more organized. But where is the center?
66W and 16.5N
Yep...the LL vort center is plainly evident on radar, passing south of PR and zipping westward toward the area south the Mona Passage.
1 likes
- srainhoutx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6919
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
- Location: Haywood County, NC
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

Levi Cowan @TropicalTidbits · 16m16 minutes ago
Buoy south of 97L shows falling pressure, and easterly winds slowing down due to the surface low eroding trade winds
3 likes
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey
Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php
Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity
Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php
Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
gatorcane wrote:Alyono, I agree I don't think initialization matters here. The ridge over the Gulf is strong and all of the global models are factoring that in pretty well and consequently are keeping this well south of the U.S...if anything they have trended even more south into Central America and Mexico.
As has often been said, the trend is your friend. With so many models trending southward, I doubt this is even going to make it into the Bay of Campeche. Of course, it's always wise to keep an eye on these systems, but as someone mentioned earlier in this thread, folks on this board look at every thunderstorm in West Africa to anyway (or something like that

1 likes
- TheAustinMan
- Category 5
- Posts: 1047
- Age: 25
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:26 pm
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
I've mapped out the locations of the 850mb (red), 700mb (green), and 500mb (blue) vorticity maxima as indicated by CIMSS analyses at 21 UTC today, superimposed on visible imagery of Invest 97L.


2 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
srainhoutx wrote:Those 18Z track models initiated about 200 km too far South according San Juan Radar. Use them cautiously.
The 18Z track models are done early on. I expect a northerly trend in the next forecast run.
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Could be waiting for the E named storm after 97L runs aground in Central America and this may help it do so.
https://twitter.com/TropicalTidbits/status/759874613899763713
https://twitter.com/TropicalTidbits/status/759874613899763713
0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- centuryv58
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 233
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:24 pm
- Location: Southeast Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
tarheelprogrammer wrote:Could be waiting for the E named storm after 97L runs aground in Central America and this may help it do so.
https://twitter.com/TropicalTidbits/status/759874613899763713
Is it Earl or Erika up next??
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
centuryv58 wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:Could be waiting for the E named storm after 97L runs aground in Central America and this may help it do so.
https://twitter.com/TropicalTidbits/status/759874613899763713
Is it Earl or Erika up next??
He was talking about this system seems similar to Erika last season that died in the Caribbean.
Video of Tropical Storm Erika from last season:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7ahZO4CydU
0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Ptarmigan wrote:srainhoutx wrote:Those 18Z track models initiated about 200 km too far South according San Juan Radar. Use them cautiously.
The 18Z track models are done early on. I expect a northerly trend in the next forecast run.
I honestly no longer see this developing at all--the models, including the NAM (the northern outlier) have all drastically shifted to the South, and even the GFS (the northernmost of the 'main 3') barely shows it making it into the GoM.
1 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Hammy wrote:Ptarmigan wrote:srainhoutx wrote:Those 18Z track models initiated about 200 km too far South according San Juan Radar. Use them cautiously.
The 18Z track models are done early on. I expect a northerly trend in the next forecast run.
I honestly no longer see this developing at all--the models, including the NAM (the northern outlier) have all drastically shifted to the South, and even the GFS (the northernmost of the 'main 3') barely shows it making it into the GoM.
Best looking wave of the year though. Models handled it fairly well overall.
1 likes
- Tireman4
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5853
- Age: 59
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
- Location: Humble, Texas
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Hammy wrote:Ptarmigan wrote:srainhoutx wrote:Those 18Z track models initiated about 200 km too far South according San Juan Radar. Use them cautiously.
The 18Z track models are done early on. I expect a northerly trend in the next forecast run.
I honestly no longer see this developing at all--the models, including the NAM (the northern outlier) have all drastically shifted to the South, and even the GFS (the northernmost of the 'main 3') barely shows it making it into the GoM.
Remember it is very early in the model sequence. Many thing can and will change over the upcoming days. I think we should all just watch and wait
1 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
ninel conde wrote:Hammy wrote:Ptarmigan wrote:
The 18Z track models are done early on. I expect a northerly trend in the next forecast run.
I honestly no longer see this developing at all--the models, including the NAM (the northern outlier) have all drastically shifted to the South, and even the GFS (the northernmost of the 'main 3') barely shows it making it into the GoM.
Best looking wave of the year though. Models handled it fairly well overall.
Best looking wave in a few years in my opinion lol but models did a good job except being too aggressive. Not a good sign for development this season if a wave cannot form in conditions forecasted by the models in the next few days. Warmest water on record, not much shear, and slowing down. Should be things that help create a monster storm but models show nothing really.
0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests