ATL: HERMINE - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5901 Postby mobilebay » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:04 pm

Due to the uncertainty of the short term movement the track will not be shifted as far west as the models have moved? Huh? Its already further west than there 2100 advisory
1 likes   

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5902 Postby SunnyThoughts » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:04 pm

Yes this was very interesting part of the discussion from NHC

Unlike the previous several days, deep convection has finally
developed north of the low-level center during the past 6 hours,
and more recent satellite trends suggest that some inner-core
curved banding features may be developing. The upper-level outflow
has been improving and expanding in all quadrants now that the
vertical wind shear has decreased to less than 10 kt and has shifted
from a northerly to a westerly component
1 likes   

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5903 Postby SeGaBob » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:05 pm

So the model consensus shifts farther west and NHC shifts east? Doesn't make much sense...
3 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5904 Postby HurriGuy » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:10 pm

SeGaBob wrote:So the model consensus shifts farther west and NHC shifts east? Doesn't make much sense...


But they did not shift the cone??

You can go to the graphics archive.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
RazorTracks
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 9
Age: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:59 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5905 Postby RazorTracks » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:11 pm

Just about to cover the entire GOM, at least with minimally moist air. I'm thinking that it may have grown too large with CoCs that are currently too weak to spin it up much, which would explain the lack of raising winds and TS upgrade.

First post by the way, even though I've been reading the boards for a long time now as a guest. I'm from Arkansas and have learned as much as I can absorb when it comes to tornadoes, so I thought I'd take an interest in tropical weather. I've stayed glued to this forum for about 8 days straight now :double:
Last edited by RazorTracks on Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
4 likes   
***NOT a professional, posts are opinion ONLY***

stormreader

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5906 Postby stormreader » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:11 pm

SunnyThoughts wrote:PRESENT MOVEMENT...NNW OR 345 DEGREES AT 2 MPH...4 KM/H haha, why not just say stationary, how can you even measure something so large moving in any direction at 2 mph?

Yes. 2mph. It is a little funny, isn't it? Especially when you're talking about a not so organized system where it's difficult to really pinpoint a center. So there we have the long-awaited beginning of the north movement :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
stormhunter7
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 763
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:13 pm
Location: Panama City Beach, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5907 Postby stormhunter7 » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:11 pm

Even with the excellent discussion by Capt. Stewart, i think the center is cleary where that northern covnvection kicked back se and cleared out the air for the next deep convection that now is on going right over the center. That would be the little dot in the center.
Image

See that ball in the middle... it exploded into some deep convection.

Tells me a few things... mid level winds have decreased into the system and now it may try to stack vertically for the next day or so, before trough winds kick in.?
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5908 Postby GeneratorPower » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:12 pm

Something is wrong here. In years past, storms were upgraded far more easily. This could have easily been called Hermine by this evening. There is always discretion on A) ending advisories for a dying system or B) initiating advisories or upgrading.

Why the sudden reluctance to upgrade storms? The umpires strike zone is pretty narrow here this month.
2 likes   

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5909 Postby SeGaBob » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:13 pm

HurriGuy wrote:
SeGaBob wrote:So the model consensus shifts farther west and NHC shifts east? Doesn't make much sense...


But they did not shift the cone??

You can go to the graphics archive.

Go to the interactive map and zoom in and compare. They actually went the opposite direction.
Last edited by SeGaBob on Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5910 Postby OntarioEggplant » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:13 pm

That could be a solid CDO intensifying tomorrow
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5911 Postby mobilebay » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:14 pm

GeneratorPower wrote:Something is wrong here. In years past, storms were upgraded far more easily. This could have easily been called Hermine by this evening. There is always discretion on A) ending advisories for a dying system or B) initiating advisories or upgrading.

Why the sudden reluctance to upgrade storms? The umpires strike zone is pretty narrow here this month.

Yea the strike zone is the size of a Pringles can
1 likes   

LJFire1467
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 14
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 10:49 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, Tx

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5912 Postby LJFire1467 » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:16 pm

Earlier, like 100 pages ago everyone was saying the stronger it gets the more west it will go. Is this not the case anymore? Im guessing the upper steering path has changed?
1 likes   

drewschmaltz
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:19 pm

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5913 Postby drewschmaltz » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:17 pm

mobilebay wrote:
GeneratorPower wrote:Something is wrong here. In years past, storms were upgraded far more easily. This could have easily been called Hermine by this evening. There is always discretion on A) ending advisories for a dying system or B) initiating advisories or upgrading.

Why the sudden reluctance to upgrade storms? The umpires strike zone is pretty narrow here this month.

Yea the strike zone is the size of a Pringles can


It always seems like empirical data to me. I always get emotional and think "this has got to be a tropical storm" or similar. Then, the discussion comes out and it's like: it's not a storm because winds don't support it. You really can't argue empirical data... but I could be wrong.
1 likes   
I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. PLEASE CONSULT SOMEONE WHO DOES. START WITH THE NHC. ALL POSTS ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4545
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5914 Postby toad strangler » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:19 pm

LJFire1467 wrote:Earlier, like 100 pages ago everyone was saying the stronger it gets the more west it will go. Is this not the case anymore? Im guessing the upper steering path has changed?


No, generally the stronger a tropical cyclone gets the more likely it is to move poleward into even a slight weakness.
Last edited by toad strangler on Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5915 Postby northjaxpro » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:21 pm

JaxGator wrote:For now, the NHC has increased the intensity forecast at landfall to 70 mph (right below hurricane strength). It looks great now. Definitely organizing.
]
Yeah it may reach Cat 1 status upon landfall. Going to be very interesting next 48 -60 hours here in Northeast Fl.and the North Florida region
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5916 Postby GeneratorPower » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:31 pm

drewschmaltz wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
GeneratorPower wrote:Something is wrong here. In years past, storms were upgraded far more easily. This could have easily been called Hermine by this evening. There is always discretion on A) ending advisories for a dying system or B) initiating advisories or upgrading.

Why the sudden reluctance to upgrade storms? The umpires strike zone is pretty narrow here this month.

Yea the strike zone is the size of a Pringles can


It always seems like empirical data to me. I always get emotional and think "this has got to be a tropical storm" or similar. Then, the discussion comes out and it's like: it's not a storm because winds don't support it. You really can't argue empirical data... but I could be wrong.


Empirical data is important but look at previous seasons. The term "this may be generous" was used countless times as forecasters fudged up and down willy-nilly. This year is by. The. Book.

I have a theory. The NHC may be pushing back against the liberties taken by The Weather Channel and Accuweather type organizations hyping every darn thunderstorm. Notice how frustrated the on camera talent has been lately? Trying to hype a Category Zero hurricane? Or a 99L? NHC may be pushing back and withholding their cannon fodder.
2 likes   

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5917 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:34 pm

If you look at the MIMIC Loop at the very end you will see the center consolidating

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/m ... splay.html
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

FLLurker32
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 245
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 10:31 am

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5918 Postby FLLurker32 » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:34 pm

northjaxpro wrote:
JaxGator wrote:For now, the NHC has increased the intensity forecast at landfall to 70 mph (right below hurricane strength). It looks great now. Definitely organizing.
]
Yeah it may reach Cat 1 status upon landfall. Going to be very interesting next 48 -60 hours here in Northeast Fl.and the North Florida region


It's really strange. All of the counties along the I75 corridor within the cone have had tropical storm watches put in place as well as a hurricane statement. Can't say that I remember ever seeing both at the same time before. I live in Marion county, btw.
0 likes   
Heather

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5919 Postby SeGaBob » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:36 pm

If the models continue their trend NHC will have to shift back west at some point. I still don't get why NHC would shift south and east...
Last edited by SeGaBob on Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5852
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: NINE - Tropical Depression - Discussion

#5920 Postby Hammy » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:36 pm

GeneratorPower wrote:
drewschmaltz wrote:
mobilebay wrote:Yea the strike zone is the size of a Pringles can


It always seems like empirical data to me. I always get emotional and think "this has got to be a tropical storm" or similar. Then, the discussion comes out and it's like: it's not a storm because winds don't support it. You really can't argue empirical data... but I could be wrong.


Empirical data is important but look at previous seasons. The term "this may be generous" was used countless times as forecasters fudged up and down willy-nilly. This year is by. The. Book.

I have a theory. The NHC may be pushing back against the liberties taken by The Weather Channel and Accuweather type organizations hyping every darn thunderstorm. Notice how frustrated the on camera talent has been lately? Trying to hype a Category Zero hurricane? Or a 99L? NHC may be pushing back and withholding their cannon fodder.



We've had more storms closer to land than the last few seasons overall--terms like "this may be generous" are more often used in the lack of actual surface data, for systems in the central Atlantic for instance. This year most of the storms have been fairly close to land, with the exceptions of Gaston and Fiona, so they don't have to guess based on satellite estimates--they know for certain what the winds at the surface are--and in the case of TD9, there is simply no surface data that supports upgrading to a tropical storm at the moment (and they rarely ever upgrade between recon flights unless there is some rapid development going on, or landfall is imminent.)
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests