ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4241 Postby OntarioEggplant » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:24 pm

Evil Jeremy wrote:
OntarioEggplant wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:so its up to the forecaster to draw the cone? the cone will move as the track shifts accordingly, i like the cone as there is no randomness or opinion...if the private forecasters including media want to step out and make a forecast than they can..look, there is plenty of time to get ready in florida, everybody is warned before june 1 in hurricane areas to have supplies and a plan..if you dont then you should


No. By accounting for the variability in models, it shouldn't shift much overall, it just makes a larger cone. The shifts would be very slight unless there was a massive shift in all models with good agreement.


So what you want is a larger cone basically? The size of the cone is determined by statistical error.


Which is a failure in a situation with large model variability like this. It's like relying on an old statistical model like the CLIPR. When the variability between say two major models is greater than the statistical error, that presents a problem.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4242 Postby Sanibel » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:26 pm

On the move now according to NHC track.


And here comes the West shift right on time. Florida residents should take these shifts seriously until proven otherwise to err on the safe side in my opinion (And get all information from official sources).
2 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4243 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:27 pm

Recon is suggesting an EWRC is currently underway. A clear secondary wind max was found in the NE quadrant and the wind field has expanded.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10158
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4244 Postby Blown Away » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:27 pm

Hazardous Weather Outlook
HAZARDOUS WEATHER OUTLOOK
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MELBOURNE FL
557 AM EDT MON OCT 3 2016
FLAGLER BEACH TO VOLUSIA-BREVARD COUNTY LINE 0-20 NM-VOLUSIA-
BREVARD COUNTY LINE TO SEBASTIAN INLET 0-20 NM-
SEBASTIAN INLET TO JUPITER INLET 0-20 NM-FLAGLER BEACH TO VOLUSIA-
BREVARD COUNTY LINE 20-60 NM-VOLUSIA-
BREVARD COUNTY LINE TO SEBASTIAN INLET 20-60 NM-
SEBASTIAN INLET TO JUPITER INLET 20-60 NM-INLAND VOLUSIA COUNTY-
NORTHERN LAKE COUNTY-ORANGE-SEMINOLE-SOUTHERN BREVARD COUNTY-
OSCEOLA-INDIAN RIVER-OKEECHOBEE-ST. LUCIE-MARTIN-
COASTAL VOLUSIA COUNTY-SOUTHERN LAKE COUNTY-
NORTHERN BREVARD COUNTY-
557 AM EDT MON OCT 3 2016

THIS HAZARDOUS WEATHER OUTLOOK IS FOR EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA.

DAYS TWO THROUGH SEVEN...TUESDAY THROUGH SUNDAY.
MAJOR HURRICANE MATTHEW IS CURRENTLY MOVING SLOWLY NORTH OVER THE
CENTRAL CARIBBEAN SEA. MATTHEW IS FORECAST TO PUSH THROUGH THE
WINDWARD PASSAGE BY LATE TUESDAY NIGHT. MODEL GUIDANCE SUGGESTS
THE HURRICANE WILL THEN LIFT NORTH-NORTHWEST OVER THE BAHAMAS
FROM MID TO LATE WEEK. AT A MINIMUM, THIS WOULD GENERATE WINDY
CONDITIONS AT THE COAST WITH BUILDING SEAS, POUNDING SURF, AND
DANGEROUS RIP CURRENTS AT THE BEACHES FOR THE LATTER PART OF THE
WORK WEEK. SIGNIFICANT BEACH EROSION WILL BE POSSIBLE AS WELL.

RESIDENTS AND VISITORS TO EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA ARE ENCOURAGED
TO MONITOR THE LATEST TRACK AND INTENSITY FORECASTS ON HURRICANE
MATTHEW FROM THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER.

BRAGAW


http://www.weather.gov/mlb
NWS Melbourne Florida forecast as of 6am...
Last edited by Blown Away on Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4245 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:27 pm

OntarioEggplant wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:
OntarioEggplant wrote:
No. By accounting for the variability in models, it shouldn't shift much overall, it just makes a larger cone. The shifts would be very slight unless there was a massive shift in all models with good agreement.


So what you want is a larger cone basically? The size of the cone is determined by statistical error.


Which is a failure in a situation with large model variability like this. It's like relying on an old statistical model like the CLIPR. When the variability between say two major models is greater than the statistical error, that presents a problem.


But if you don't use that methodology, you introduce subjectivity and bias into the cone. And then forecasters will have to coordinate cone size, on top of already trying to keep continuity in track, intensity, wind radii, watches/warnings, key impacts wordings, etc.
1 likes   

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4246 Postby sponger » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:28 pm

KWT wrote:Alot of mets seems to be banking on the trends that is recently happening not really reflecting reality, risky to go down that route for sure!

Does seem like an east hint to the motion, still near due north but a touch east, like 5 degrees or something.


They have been burned before. The 5 update will change all of their outlooks.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4247 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:28 pm

OntarioEggplant wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:
OntarioEggplant wrote:
No. By accounting for the variability in models, it shouldn't shift much overall, it just makes a larger cone. The shifts would be very slight unless there was a massive shift in all models with good agreement.


So what you want is a larger cone basically? The size of the cone is determined by statistical error.


Which is a failure in a situation with large model variability like this. It's like relying on an old statistical model like the CLIPR. When the variability between say two major models is greater than the statistical error, that presents a problem.
it presents a huge problem having random cones drawn by different folks causing massive confusion by an already confused public..you can put an nhc track directly over fort lauderdale and there is massive confusion as to what to do and when as hard as the govt and media try to keep it clear...can you imagine having multiple cones out there in the public, yikes..the statistical cone is already dubbed the cone of confusion and its pure science
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4248 Postby Blinhart » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:30 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
Blinhart wrote:A westward the models will go, I knew there was no way this was gonna go due North and then NNE.
weel it hasnt verfied yet but where do you think its going after cuba?


Right to your back door.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145769
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4249 Postby cycloneye » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:31 pm

Down to 940 mbs on last pass of this Air Force mission.
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4250 Postby Sanibel » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:32 pm

And headed towards an improving upper level High...
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4251 Postby hurricaneCW » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:32 pm

Just when you thought it was safe to breath, now the entire east coast is back in danger. Could end up being a mix between Floyd/Hazel and then you throw in the trough interaction.
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4252 Postby stormreader » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:33 pm

I hope people in Fl are beginning to realize the seriousness of the situation. This storm will very likely rival, if not be stronger, than the likes of some of the all-time great Fl storms. It will come in from the Bahamas where it should remain powerful, if not even grow in intensity. It will be larger than Andrew or Charley which were both smallish in size. It will be on the order of the Great Miami Hurricane of 1926 or the Lake Okeechobee Hurricane or 1928 or even stronger. In any case it will be up there with some of the most infamous storms of all time, and has the potential to be the worse.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4253 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:33 pm

Blinhart wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
Blinhart wrote:A westward the models will go, I knew there was no way this was gonna go due North and then NNE.
weel it hasnt verfied yet but where do you think its going after cuba?


Right to your back door.
i think it goes at least 100 miles north of fort lauderdale so now we are both on record
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4254 Postby KWT » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:33 pm

cycloneye wrote:Down to 940 mbs on last pass of this Air Force mission.


Interesting, this system has been toying with an EWRC for a while yet pressure is still dropping.

It seems like the type of storm where the inner eyewall won't collapse until the outer has contracted almost into its place. Maybe land interaction will finally be what does it.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4032
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4255 Postby AutoPenalti » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:33 pm

Blinhart wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
Blinhart wrote:A westward the models will go, I knew there was no way this was gonna go due North and then NNE.
weel it hasnt verfied yet but where do you think its going after cuba?


Right to your back door.

Ouch, Ft. Lauderdale.

I live about 10 minutes by the coast.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4237
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4256 Postby abajan » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:33 pm

WPBWeather wrote:
sittingduck wrote:The 11 am says nudged "east" did they mean "west" or did it really get nudged "east" Not really important at this point - but curious.


Well, interesting. I was nudged west according to the graphic they publish.

Perhaps the southern part of the cone was nudged east while the northern part was nudged west.
0 likes   

ThetaE
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:50 pm
Location: Boston

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4257 Postby ThetaE » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:33 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:Recon is suggesting an EWRC is currently underway. A clear secondary wind max was found in the NE quadrant and the wind field has expanded.


cycloneye wrote:Down to 940 mbs on last pass of this Air Force mission.


So it's undergoing an EWRC, yet deepening slightly? :eek:
0 likes   
I'm a busy grad student, not a professional forecaster. Please refer to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts.

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4032
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4258 Postby AutoPenalti » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:35 pm

ThetaE wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:Recon is suggesting an EWRC is currently underway. A clear secondary wind max was found in the NE quadrant and the wind field has expanded.


cycloneye wrote:Down to 940 mbs on last pass of this Air Force mission.


So it's undergoing an EWRC, yet deepening slightly? :eek:

Matthew logic.
2 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4769
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4259 Postby psyclone » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:36 pm

stormreader wrote:I hope people in Fl are beginning to realize the seriousness of the situation. This storm will very likely rival, if not be stronger, than the likes of some of the all-time great Fl storms. It will come in from the Bahamas where it should remain powerful, if not even grow in intensity. It will be larger than Andrew or Charley which were both smallish in size. It will be on the order of the Great Miami Hurricane of 1926 or the Lake Okeechobee Hurricane or 1928 or even stronger. In any case it will be up there with some of the most infamous storms of all time, and has the potential to be the worse.


That's the definition of pure, unjustified hype.
6 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4260 Postby KWT » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:36 pm

Looks like a very nervy few days ahead for Florida and the east coast in general, especially SC/NC.

The bad news is any land blow is going to be short from Haiti and Cuba and really isn't going to put this storm down too much.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 4 guests