ATL: TEN - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
nativefloridian
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:48 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#421 Postby nativefloridian » Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:59 am

ronjon wrote:
SFLcane wrote:Just about game over based on those shear values but you never know.


No not really - i only see one value greater than 20 kts - and this is one model run. Don't forget these values are difficult to forecast. In addition, the upper level divergence caused by shear will maintain heavy convection so when it relaxes you have conditions favorable for low pressure to develop (or redevelop). Will it struggle the next few days - no doubt. Will probably save FL from a major cane impact.



Shear doesn't look that catastrophic according to this map:
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/windmain.php?&basin=atlantic&sat=wg8&prod=sht&zoom=&time=

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
0 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#422 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:02 am

nativefloridian wrote:
ronjon wrote:
SFLcane wrote:Just about game over based on those shear values but you never know.


No not really - i only see one value greater than 20 kts - and this is one model run. Don't forget these values are difficult to forecast. In addition, the upper level divergence caused by shear will maintain heavy convection so when it relaxes you have conditions favorable for low pressure to develop (or redevelop). Will it struggle the next few days - no doubt. Will probably save FL from a major cane impact.



Shear doesn't look that catastrophic according to this map:
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/windmain.php?&basin=atlantic&sat=wg8&prod=sht&zoom=&time=

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

This thing is about to get destroyed by shear
3 likes   

User avatar
nativefloridian
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:48 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#423 Postby nativefloridian » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:09 am

Thetxhurricanemaster wrote:
nativefloridian wrote:
ronjon wrote:
No not really - i only see one value greater than 20 kts - and this is one model run. Don't forget these values are difficult to forecast. In addition, the upper level divergence caused by shear will maintain heavy convection so when it relaxes you have conditions favorable for low pressure to develop (or redevelop). Will it struggle the next few days - no doubt. Will probably save FL from a major cane impact.



Shear doesn't look that catastrophic according to this map:
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/windmain.php?&basin=atlantic&sat=wg8&prod=sht&zoom=&time=

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

This thing is about to get destroyed by shear


I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens.....like we do with everything we track. I enjoy reading other's opinions and doing a little checking myself, despite my limited knowledge. So I really appreciate all the more knowledgeable weather people posting on this site as I've learned quite a bit over the years. :D
1 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#424 Postby Weatherboy1 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:13 am

I would tend to agree with the comment earlier this has probably been a TD since very late yesterday/early this morning. Clearly, there is a risk you designate it and then it just gets sheared apart and you downgrade it a day later. But in my unprofessional opinion, it deserves a number. As for track, models definitely shifting more to the N today. Assuming 92 survives, not clear yet if it will be a recurve or a FL threat yet ...
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 49
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#425 Postby SouthFLTropics » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:30 am

The shear is taking a toll...If you look on visible it looks like we are about to see the LLC be exposed on the west side of the convection. It should be noted that while the convection is blowing off, the circulation still looks pretty strong.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
p1nheadlarry
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 672
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: SR County FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#426 Postby p1nheadlarry » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:32 am

Weatherboy1 wrote:I would tend to agree with the comment earlier this has probably been a TD since very late yesterday/early this morning. Clearly, there is a risk you designate it and then it just gets sheared apart and you downgrade it a day later. But in my unprofessional opinion, it deserves a number. As for track, models definitely shifting more to the N today. Assuming 92 survives, not clear yet if it will be a recurve or a FL threat yet ...


Wouldn't a north shift be bad for 92L? Would need to stay as far from the upper low to it's north [and possibly Harvey] as possible. Maybe due to the midlevel high to the west?
0 likes   
--;->#GoNoles--;->.

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#427 Postby Blown Away » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:48 am

MeteoMark very optimistic about Harvey/92L... :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_w_Y0-ndOE
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#428 Postby sma10 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:50 am

The TUTT immediately to its north is of little long - term concern I believe. 92L will be west of its influence in a matter of hours.

The ull currently developing at 30N 60W, and dropping fast, is forecast by the GFS to bump right into 92L tomorrow with an intersection point around 20N 60W. Will this evolve exactly as predicted? The GFS says they will be basically interlocked for days. I suppose if it's been modeled accurately 92L will suffer greatly. But there is definitely still room for "what if"
0 likes   

hd44

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#429 Postby hd44 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:51 am

jlauderdal wrote:
gatorcane wrote:This has been a TD since yesterday evening in my opinion. Convection is sustaining over the center as well. This should be upgraded soon.

One thing is for sure shear is enhancing the convection as we thought it would.


i believe they want to give it the rest of the day, shear going up, why designate only to declassify...lets see..so far its proven to be one of these systems thats a fighter...each one of these entities is different in the way it responds


Sorry don't agree. If it is a td even for 24 hours they should say so. Lots of times this happened before look at td 10 in 2005.
1 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7177
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#430 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:51 am

Blown Away wrote:MeteoMark very optimistic about Harvey/92L... :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_w_Y0-ndOE


as bullish as they come.. :D
1 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7177
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#431 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:52 am

hd44 wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
gatorcane wrote:This has been a TD since yesterday evening in my opinion. Convection is sustaining over the center as well. This should be upgraded soon.

One thing is for sure shear is enhancing the convection as we thought it would.


i believe they want to give it the rest of the day, shear going up, why designate only to declassify...lets see..so far its proven to be one of these systems thats a fighter...each one of these entities is different in the way it responds


Sorry don't agree. If it is a td even for 24 hours they should say so. Lots of times this happened before look at td 10 in 2005.


fair enough..i will trust your info on td 10 from 2005
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#432 Postby sma10 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:56 am

Blown Away wrote:MeteoMark very optimistic about Harvey/92L... :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_w_Y0-ndOE


Haha, never heard of this guy
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#433 Postby Blown Away » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:58 am

Image
Convection still good for an Invest...
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#434 Postby SFLcane » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:58 am

lol..guess upper level lows and shear aren't apparent to him.
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#435 Postby SFLcane » Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:02 am

ouch look at the outflow boundaries coming out of this thing. Certainly not indicative of a developing cyclone.

 https://twitter.com/gdimeweather/status/898559716753682433


0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#436 Postby SFLcane » Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:03 am

I for one expect probs to be lowered this afternoon if not this evening.
0 likes   

CycloneCaptain
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 7:14 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#437 Postby CycloneCaptain » Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:08 am

Blown Away wrote:MeteoMark very optimistic about Harvey/92L... :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_w_Y0-ndOE


He believes 92l will become a cat 1 hurricane and hit Florida, surprising due to wind shear in my opinion.
0 likes   
The predictions that you see above this signature may not be accurate and should not be taken as accurate weather advice. Please consult the NWS or the NHC for your weather needs.

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#438 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:09 am

SFLcane wrote:I for one expect probs to be lowered this afternoon if not this evening.

I agree it's getting sheared already and the shear just started so this likely won't survive
0 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1728
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#439 Postby OuterBanker » Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:10 am

It does appear it’s about to decouple. But I wouldn’t write it off until the llc dissipates. Was not Gert a naked swirl until after 60w? It hasn’t even passed 55 w. Not ready to write its epitaph just yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#440 Postby Blown Away » Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:16 am

Image
Cool outflow boundaries...
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests