
Broad still as expected... but i think there are probably west on the southern portion of the axis.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
drezee wrote:Not to be critical of NHC, but you have a clear closed low with a buoy west of it at 1009 mb. Rapidly deepening in a place that make no sense for it to rapidly deepen unless you have a system rapidly deepening. The buoy is in clean air hundreds of miles from the center...
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42055
Please upgrade...this is a potentially deadly situation...
northjaxpro wrote:The upper level low south of the Louisiana coast basically has been stationary for the past 12-24 hours now. This in itself is very intriguing. This feature was supposed to have started to fill in and get lifted out to have the upper ridge direct the developing cyclone off the NW coast of the Yucatan Peninsula toward the northwest.
So far, the ULL is hanging tough and I do not see it pulling away at this juncture. I would not be shocked at all if models started shifting eastward. I think everyone along the Gulf Coast from NE MX to Mississippi needs to be paying serious attention with this situation the rest of this week!
ronjon wrote:northjaxpro wrote:The upper level low south of the Louisiana coast basically has been stationary for the past 12-24 hours now. This in itself is very intriguing. This feature was supposed to have started to fill in and get lifted out to have the upper ridge direct the developing cyclone off the NW coast of the Yucatan Peninsula toward the northwest.
So far, the ULL is hanging tough and I do not see it pulling away at this juncture. I would not be shocked at all if models started shifting eastward. I think everyone along the Gulf Coast from NE MX to Mississippi needs to be paying serious attention with this situation the rest of this week!
The NAM and JMA show this solution which aren't the best models for tropical cyclones. I think there's a decent chance high pressure builds in and the storm stays just offshore of Tx and landfalls further east in La. The real disturbing trend is the increase now forecast in intensity.
stormreader wrote:Okay, I'm still not sure that maybe the storm is organizing a little north of the official plots given to us. You guys have checked out the ASCAT passes and interpreted them. Do they verify the official placement of the "center". Looking at simple visible, I am seeing some flow which looks like counterclockwise around the south end of a growing circulation (further north then the X on the chart). Could be wrong. Let me know.
Bizzles wrote:Still no 6AM TWO...think NHC is working on something...
hd44 wrote:Bizzles wrote:Still no 6AM TWO...think NHC is working on something...
Two comes out at 8am, in 1.5 hours we will have an update !
Nimbus wrote:The small vort that formed off the coast looks like it actually moved south about 30 miles overnight.
Pressure readings at buoy 42055 have been plummeting which might mean a center relocation is occurring to that area. Winds at the buoy are NNE at 19.4 kts so the center is still currently SSE of that area. In any event it appears Harvey pretty much stalled just off the coast at least temporarily which would mean a change in model timing.
If there is a ridge building l;ate in the forecast this could mean a track swing right in the model runs today.
Nimbus wrote:The small vort that formed off the coast looks like it actually moved south about 30 miles overnight.
Pressure readings at buoy 42055 have been plummeting which might mean a center relocation is occurring to that area. Winds at the buoy are NNE at 19.4 kts so the center is still currently SSE of that area. In any event it appears Harvey pretty much stalled just off the coast at least temporarily which would mean a change in model timing.
If there is a ridge building l;ate in the forecast this could mean a track swing right in the model runs today.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests