ATL: HARVEY - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3021 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:15 am

ROCK wrote:EWRC going on? That means the expansion of the wind field after it's done...basically he is juicing now..awesome

You picked the track from the getgo well done. Nobody i think wants to see this any stronger
than it now.
1 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16075
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3022 Postby Kingarabian » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:16 am

Open to the SE? Yeah there's something interfering with the system...
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

BYG Jacob

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3023 Postby BYG Jacob » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:17 am

Looking at satellite, is it me or did Harvey get a big burst of convection on the west side?
0 likes   

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3024 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:18 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
MaineWeatherNut wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
those are not concentric eyewalls.. depending and the flight path.. they flew through two curved bands.. lol


Latest Airforce Recon VDM:

L. OPEN SE
M. CO10-20

Edit: Actually that's the latest NOAA VDM


if a ERC has started this early something forced it. the dynamics for a ERC dont occur until a mature pressure gradient exists. I highly doubt that is what is happening. likely just a misinterpretation.


Latest VDM now has it back up to 20nm and closed again.

L. CLOSED
M. C20
1 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

smithtim
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:43 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3025 Postby smithtim » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:18 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
MaineWeatherNut wrote:
BYG Jacob wrote:Where did it confirm an EWRC


It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.


those are not concentric eyewalls.. depending and the flight path.. they flew through two curved bands.. concentric would be in all quads.


Yeah, im not seeing it & textbook definition is EWRC is for cat 3+

But this storm very easily could be cat 3 soon and have to remember as much data as recon gets us those are just snapshots in time... could already dropped more pressure??
0 likes   
Disclaimer: while I am PhD who does research I'm rambling here so this post should be taken only for entertainment...use nhc.noaa.gov for official forecasts!

FLoridian living round here for a while: 2016 Matthew & 1998 Earl lived barrier island landfall. Also lived nearby/inland for: 2017 Irma & 2004 Frances,Jeanne & 1992 Andrew

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3026 Postby Alyono » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:20 am

ROCK wrote:EWRC going on? That means the expansion of the wind field after it's done...basically he is juicing now..awesome


this isn't exactly the type of EWRC that will cause weakening. Outer one is too close
0 likes   

BRweather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:50 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3027 Postby BRweather » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:21 am

NW eyewall surface 88 knots

Image
0 likes   

smithtim
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:43 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3028 Postby smithtim » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:21 am

smithtim wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
MaineWeatherNut wrote:
It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.


those are not concentric eyewalls.. depending and the flight path.. they flew through two curved bands.. concentric would be in all quads.


Yeah, im not seeing it & textbook definition is EWRC is for cat 3+

But this storm very easily could be cat 3 soon and have to remember as much data as recon gets us those are just snapshots in time... could already dropped more pressure??


BTW can anyone share links to any local radars thay are available yet to get good look at?

Thanks
0 likes   
Disclaimer: while I am PhD who does research I'm rambling here so this post should be taken only for entertainment...use nhc.noaa.gov for official forecasts!

FLoridian living round here for a while: 2016 Matthew & 1998 Earl lived barrier island landfall. Also lived nearby/inland for: 2017 Irma & 2004 Frances,Jeanne & 1992 Andrew

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3029 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:21 am

Bizzles wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:If it’s truly developing a second eyewall then that will expand the size and wind field of the system. Will have to wait and see if that continues, it’s unusual to see an EWRC in a cat 1 or 2 storm.

Maybe an indication that it is strengthening very rapidly.


no, the opposite of that. an ERC occurs (just to be brief) after the outside pressure becomes to great for the inner core to maintain ( among many other dynamics). you get outward pressure waves that eventually focus the convergence at a distance proportional to the incoming "convergence" ..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4233
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3030 Postby South Texas Storms » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:23 am

Looking at the latest radar and satellite loop, this storm really needs to start gaining some latitude if it's going to make landfall north of Corpus.
1 likes   

BYG Jacob

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3031 Postby BYG Jacob » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:23 am

Harvey beginning to open up on the Ne side?

Image
0 likes   

BRweather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:50 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3032 Postby BRweather » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:25 am

South Texas Storms wrote:Looking at the latest radar and satellite loop, this storm really needs to start gaining some latitude if it's going to make landfall north of Corpus.


I believe most of the models actually insist the more northerly component tomorrow evening on its approach to landfall. I think track is going according to plan as of now. GFS really pushed it north last run before landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3033 Postby Blinhart » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:32 am

BYG Jacob wrote:Harvey beginning to open up on the Ne side?

Image


um no, just consolidation of the storms.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3034 Postby Steve » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:35 am

ROCK wrote:Um Where the H is Steve?
Talk me off he ledge bro!!


Needing to go to sleep and lying in bed waiting for the Euro. I'm pretty lost on what happens. Divergence after 3 days is crazy so far. If the EC sticks with its ideas i would probably go with that or something close for the next week. I don't trust any of the models after 4 days this year, and I haven't been sold on what I think happens after the first hit on Texas. There is some indication in model depictions that this isn't going to be super big though it could get 15-20mb deeper. There will be a prolonged rain event, but maybe/hopefully it stays more localized to the center?
0 likes   

Bonesinis
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 9:09 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3035 Postby Bonesinis » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:37 am

On the west side of Corpus trying to decide to leave or stay. No flood threat where I am at but that wind is pretty high.
1 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3036 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:38 am

So looking at radar, I think I see what the hurricane hunters were referring to with th concentric eyewall ob. Radar has been showing a “dry spot” on the southern side of the eye which looked like a second eyewall due to banding. Now the SW portion of the inner “eye” is opening up on the SW corner and it appears the eye is consolidating at a larger size now.
0 likes   

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3037 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:38 am

Ok why is the NOAA Flight still reporting Concentric Eyewalls of 10 and 20 miles while the AF plane is reporting a close 20 mile wide eye? Just doing different things at different levels?
0 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9303
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3038 Postby Sciencerocks » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:38 am

Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:Humm sad is this the crew of members who are wanting to see destruction and likely fatalities.



Well, we're here to watch such storms and we don't control what they do. We're amazed by them and realize what harm they can cause on other people.

It is part of begin interested and the nature of the beast.
Last edited by Sciencerocks on Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes   

BRweather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:50 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3039 Postby BRweather » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:39 am

Steve wrote:
ROCK wrote:Um Where the H is Steve?
Talk me off he ledge bro!!


Needing to go to sleep and lying in bed waiting for the Euro. I'm pretty lost on what happens. Divergence after 3 days is crazy so far. If the EC sticks with its ideas i would probably go with that or something close for the next week. I don't trust any of the models after 4 days this year, and I haven't been sold on what I think happens after the first hit on Texas. There is some indication in model depictions that this isn't going to be super big though it could get 15-20mb deeper. There will be a prolonged rain event, but maybe/hopefully it stays more localized to the center?


Speaking of this, GFS ensembles finished it looks like just about all of them go back into the Gulf now.

Image
2 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5509
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3040 Postby chaser1 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 12:40 am

Exalt wrote:
stephen23 wrote:
chaser1 wrote:Pin the Pressure on the Donkey time lol, anyone's guess on lowest (GOM) pressure that Harvey achieves? I"m going to guess 937mb, but filling a bit prior to landfall.


I'm wondering why you think pressure will come up some prior to landfall. I saw what you wrote earlier about upwelling. But, from what I have heard about this particular area the warm water extends deeper then usual and upwelling in this area just feeds more warm water.


The Gulf tends to have dry air right up at the coast that usually causes most landfalling cyclones to drop a slight amount in intensity prior to landfall (most prominent example being Katrina), also just simple interaction with landmasses can cause cyclones to have a disruption in intensification or cause a drop in strength.

Although from what I've seen conditions look fair for Harvey.


True enough. Keep in mind that while the Gulf of Mex. is deep, you've got approx. 2-3 degrees of quickly rising continental shelf as one approaches the coastline. Granted, I'd guess these shelf waters are initially a tad warmer yet by virtue of the ease to warm a shallow pool even quicker. That same logic applies to mixing as well however. Of course the other variables that are hard to pin down include ERC's but i'd say the biggest factor lies with proximity to landfall and as already described, an infusion of stable air with a very slow approach. Now, take Hurricane Andrew or Charlie which charged the coastline... here a deepening phase might (did) easily continue right up to landfall. That can happen as well with slow moving hurricanes but here one has to consider other factors that might potentially aid or disrupt a hurricane's core.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests