ROCK wrote:EWRC going on? That means the expansion of the wind field after it's done...basically he is juicing now..awesome
You picked the track from the getgo well done. Nobody i think wants to see this any stronger
than it now.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
ROCK wrote:EWRC going on? That means the expansion of the wind field after it's done...basically he is juicing now..awesome
Aric Dunn wrote:MaineWeatherNut wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
those are not concentric eyewalls.. depending and the flight path.. they flew through two curved bands.. lol
Latest Airforce Recon VDM:
L. OPEN SE
M. CO10-20
Edit: Actually that's the latest NOAA VDM
if a ERC has started this early something forced it. the dynamics for a ERC dont occur until a mature pressure gradient exists. I highly doubt that is what is happening. likely just a misinterpretation.
Aric Dunn wrote:MaineWeatherNut wrote:BYG Jacob wrote:Where did it confirm an EWRC
It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.
those are not concentric eyewalls.. depending and the flight path.. they flew through two curved bands.. concentric would be in all quads.
ROCK wrote:EWRC going on? That means the expansion of the wind field after it's done...basically he is juicing now..awesome
smithtim wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:MaineWeatherNut wrote:
It confirmed Concentric Eyewalls of 10nm and 20nm.
those are not concentric eyewalls.. depending and the flight path.. they flew through two curved bands.. concentric would be in all quads.
Yeah, im not seeing it & textbook definition is EWRC is for cat 3+
But this storm very easily could be cat 3 soon and have to remember as much data as recon gets us those are just snapshots in time... could already dropped more pressure??
Bizzles wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:If it’s truly developing a second eyewall then that will expand the size and wind field of the system. Will have to wait and see if that continues, it’s unusual to see an EWRC in a cat 1 or 2 storm.
Maybe an indication that it is strengthening very rapidly.
South Texas Storms wrote:Looking at the latest radar and satellite loop, this storm really needs to start gaining some latitude if it's going to make landfall north of Corpus.
BYG Jacob wrote:Harvey beginning to open up on the Ne side?
ROCK wrote:Um Where the H is Steve?
Talk me off he ledge bro!!
Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:Humm sad is this the crew of members who are wanting to see destruction and likely fatalities.
Steve wrote:ROCK wrote:Um Where the H is Steve?
Talk me off he ledge bro!!
Needing to go to sleep and lying in bed waiting for the Euro. I'm pretty lost on what happens. Divergence after 3 days is crazy so far. If the EC sticks with its ideas i would probably go with that or something close for the next week. I don't trust any of the models after 4 days this year, and I haven't been sold on what I think happens after the first hit on Texas. There is some indication in model depictions that this isn't going to be super big though it could get 15-20mb deeper. There will be a prolonged rain event, but maybe/hopefully it stays more localized to the center?
Exalt wrote:stephen23 wrote:chaser1 wrote:Pin the Pressure on the Donkey time lol, anyone's guess on lowest (GOM) pressure that Harvey achieves? I"m going to guess 937mb, but filling a bit prior to landfall.
I'm wondering why you think pressure will come up some prior to landfall. I saw what you wrote earlier about upwelling. But, from what I have heard about this particular area the warm water extends deeper then usual and upwelling in this area just feeds more warm water.
The Gulf tends to have dry air right up at the coast that usually causes most landfalling cyclones to drop a slight amount in intensity prior to landfall (most prominent example being Katrina), also just simple interaction with landmasses can cause cyclones to have a disruption in intensification or cause a drop in strength.
Although from what I've seen conditions look fair for Harvey.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests