ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Cunxi Huang
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 329
Age: 27
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:17 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2541 Postby Cunxi Huang » Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:52 pm

This is a dramatic change from 18z GFS ensemble. Most members agree a landfall.

Image
Image
0 likes   
06 SuTY SAOMAI | 09 TY LINFA | 10 TY FANAPI | 10 SuTY MEGI | 16 SuTY MERANTI | 19 SuTY LEKIMA | 24 C2 FRANCINE
DO NOT use my posts for life and death decisions. For official information, please refer to products from your RSMC and national weather agency.

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2542 Postby SFLcane » Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:55 pm

Holy hell on that GEFS into Florida.. :eek:
2 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2543 Postby SouthFLTropics » Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:55 pm

HWRF at 126 hours... 929MB NE of Puerto Rico. 118 Knots...Too close for comfort

Image
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

caneseddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1172
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Plantation, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2544 Postby caneseddy » Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:57 pm

Cunxi Huang wrote:This is a dramatic change from 18z GFS ensemble. Most members agree a landfall.

Image
Image


Yep...most ensembles are now South Carolina and points south..not a good trend if you are in Florida
Last edited by caneseddy on Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4825
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2545 Postby ronjon » Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:57 pm

The ensembles are showing increasing likelihood of a CONUS hit. We wait and watch.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2546 Postby Ivanhater » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:03 pm

Most show a continued wnw heading indicating we may see some further SW shifts in the future with a stronger high moving into place
2 likes   
Michael

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2547 Postby curtadams » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:10 pm

1900hurricane wrote:It's interesting to see the GEFS spread considerably to the southwest in the medium range when compared to the operational run. The GEFS envelope is generally thought to be a little under-dispersive in many cases, but the operational run isn't even in the envelope.
Not quite. There's *one* member landfalling near NYC and a couple more scattered about in odd places. The operational is certainly an atypical member, but it's not entirely out of the spread.
1 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2548 Postby 1900hurricane » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:20 pm

curtadams wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:It's interesting to see the GEFS spread considerably to the southwest in the medium range when compared to the operational run. The GEFS envelope is generally thought to be a little under-dispersive in many cases, but the operational run isn't even in the envelope.
Not quite. There's *one* member landfalling near NYC and a couple more scattered about in odd places. The operational is certainly an atypical member, but it's not entirely out of the spread.

Well, kind of. That one member with a similar track is much slower than the operational run. By 12Z September 10 (tau 210), there are no members remotely close to the operational run.

Image

Image
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2549 Postby stormreader » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:20 pm

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:The one thing that I am concerned about is that no matter how powerful the windshield wiping is, we still have our 3 best models showing landfalls, which is the last thing this country needs.


Not going out to sea. Personally, I'm ruling out the Outer Banks and points north. So don't think it will even be close to going out to sea. Still possible it approaches SE coast and makes a strong NW jog toward the Cape Fear, NC area, but that's about as far north as I think it would go. So broad area for me is Cape Fear, NC down to the coast of Cuba. See how that plays out for a couple of days. If that looks to verify, then further refine it then.
1 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2550 Postby Dean4Storms » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:22 pm

Anything beyond 5 days is subject to big changes with any model or ensemble. Just an extrapolation of the slightest track or speed change now can make hundreds of miles difference out 6-10 days. A difference of hitting Florida to New England in this situation right now.
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2551 Postby TheStormExpert » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:23 pm

So should we be expecting a westward shift on the 00z GFS run showing a Florida landfall? :eek:
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2552 Postby stormreader » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:23 pm

Ivanhater wrote:Most show a continued wnw heading indicating we may see some further SW shifts in the future with a stronger high moving into place

Very possible.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2553 Postby gatorcane » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:24 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:So should we be expecting a westward shift on the 00z GFS run showing a Florida landfall? :eek:


Yes I think we will see a significant west shift. Often times the ensembles gives clues on what the next OP run will do. Yikes that is some ensemble run.
Last edited by gatorcane on Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

Langinbang187

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2554 Postby Langinbang187 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:25 pm

Hybridstorm_November2001 wrote:
Hurricane Andrew wrote:
Langinbang187 wrote:Definitely favoring the Euro setup here. That ridge over Atlantic Canada looks comically overdone.

On the contrary, the trough or amount of cutoffing could be overdone as well.


Keep in mind we've had roughly two weeks of clear, cool weather from the last ridge up here, so the next one could be a monster too.


We haven't had a "monster ridge" in Nova Scotia all Summer. I'm not banking on it.
0 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2555 Postby Michele B » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:30 pm

1900hurricane wrote:
curtadams wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:It's interesting to see the GEFS spread considerably to the southwest in the medium range when compared to the operational run. The GEFS envelope is generally thought to be a little under-dispersive in many cases, but the operational run isn't even in the envelope.
Not quite. There's *one* member landfalling near NYC and a couple more scattered about in odd places. The operational is certainly an atypical member, but it's not entirely out of the spread.

Well, kind of. That one member with a similar track is much slower than the operational run. By 12Z September 10 (tau 210), there are no members remotely close to the operational run.

Image


Oh, I REALLY don't like this image!

Except that would bring us NE winds....which is the only good part. I wouldn't have to worry about the one tree I'm worried would fall in a storm. NE winds will take it down away from the house!

:cheesy:
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2556 Postby Michele B » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:33 pm

ColdMiser123 wrote:
Blown Away wrote:
ColdMiser123 wrote:The GEFS have a ridiculous signal into Florida at 18z.


Can you post image?


Had to do a double take when I first ran through this on WSI.

Image


Yeah, I saw this. Looks like Charley again.

I don't want to go through that again! But preps are just about done, so...now we wait.
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2557 Postby sma10 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:33 pm

Holy Hannah, did you see the strength of those members striking SE FL? I think they were all cat 5.
1 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2558 Postby TheStormExpert » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:35 pm

gatorcane wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:So should we be expecting a westward shift on the 00z GFS run showing a Florida landfall? :eek:


Yes I think we will see a significant west shift. Often times the ensembles gives clues on what the next OP run will do. Yikes that is some ensemble run.

Yeah starting to think that MAYBE unfortunately the models are starting to come in-line with Irma getting blocked and forced west into the U.S. likely somewhere along the SE U.S. coastline including Florida.
0 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2559 Postby otowntiger » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:36 pm

ROCK wrote:
Steve wrote:Landfall is is 8 1/2 days from 18z today which means the storm hits NYC Sunday morning at 1am. 8 1/2 days is a long time in the model world but inside of model "fantasy land". And I'd caution everyone that the GFS and European haven't exactly been good in the mid-range which is what we'll be in throughout the labor day weekend. Unless all tracks come into agreement, don't expect to see the real solution, unless one accidentally hits it, before next Tuesday when we get inside of 5 days.


IDK Steve the EURO was pretty good with Harv around 3-4 days. It was the first model to throw out the wacky mid TX coast hit then bounced back to MX then back up the coast. Probably the reason the NHC is weighing so heavily on it this year. By far it has out performed the GFS as we all know...I also like the UKMET model this year...Not bad squirrely has the others. JMO
yeah the Euro did do well with Harvey like you say, only 3-4 days out. How did it do 8-9 days out?
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7185
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2560 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:38 pm

Cunxi Huang wrote:This is a dramatic change from 18z GFS ensemble. Most members agree a landfall.

Image
Image
the recurve idea east of the bahamas sure did die a quick death.. :D
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests