ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1766
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3921 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:50 am

storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192


AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome

You're comparing the 00z from yesterday. This is a HUGE difference from the OTS track 12 hrs ago.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3922 Postby meriland29 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:51 am

wow...

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3863
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3923 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:51 am

storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192


AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome

But the thing is, 12z showed Irma go OTS whereas 00z shows a NC/SC landfall.
2 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3924 Postby Steve » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:51 am

storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192


AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome


It didn't matter though because we have at least partial landfall at 216 hours roughly in the same place the GFS has it. Everything else is farther south. GFS & Euro have Wilmington/Jacksonville at least close. I need to go crash, but I'm going to wait for 240 hours. Recall GFS brings it in, goes north then hooks west. We won't know what EC does much after landfall because they only show 10 days.
Last edited by Steve on Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
1 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3925 Postby stormreader » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:53 am

xtyphooncyclonex wrote:Stronger ridge, no where to go but landfall


Of course. Once we saw just how close this would come to Fl, (a couple of days ago), was there any real outlook that could actually bring this out to sea?? I think not.
0 likes   

storm4u
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 7:26 am
Location: agawam, ma
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3926 Postby storm4u » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:54 am

Ugh just saw that lol

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192


AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome

You're comparing the 00z from yesterday. This is a HUGE difference from the OTS track 12 hrs ago.
2 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5200
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3927 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:54 am

Well, goodnight everyone. We'll do it all again tomorrow ;)
3 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3928 Postby stormreader » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:55 am

xtyphooncyclonex wrote:
storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192


AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome

But the thing is, 12z showed Irma go OTS whereas 00z shows a NC/SC landfall.


Not going out to sea.
0 likes   

WHYB630
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:19 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3929 Postby WHYB630 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:55 am

although the landfall location looks similar, the speed and upper patterns are very different between EC and GFS

Image
Image
1 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3930 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:56 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
USTropics wrote:I don't see a turn yet on the high-res ECMWF, very close call though:

Image


lol there is nothing but ridging building in.. gulf maybe ?


That track in the run would surely cave in the canes core structure.
Last edited by Digital-TC-Chaser on Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3863
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3931 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:57 am

240 inland.... Virginia
1 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4239
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3932 Postby SouthFLTropics » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:57 am

Jacksonville/New Bern/Morehead City Landfall
1 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2990
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3933 Postby Bocadude85 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:58 am

A 100 mile shift would bring Irma ashore in Florida...not a lot of room for error in a 7 day forecast..
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3934 Postby txwatcher91 » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:58 am

Two notes and then I’m off for the night.

1. Euro and GFS are nearly identical at hour 144 with trough and ridge placement/orientation. This is a big deal because that’s not far out and getting within range where we will see much smaller changes. The fact they’re so close now at this range tells me the pattern is being resolved gradually and chances for an East Coast hit are very high, imo.
2. Most likely track is, IMO, Floyd as the synoptic setup at days 5-6 favors a storm that comes close to FL but then gets lifted north into the weakness. Florida will be very close but I believe they’ll be spared a landfall. NC may not be as fortunate.
1 likes   

User avatar
birddogsc
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:09 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3935 Postby birddogsc » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:58 am

SouthFLTropics wrote:Jacksonville/New Bern/Morehead City Landfall

On through the tidewater...
Image
Last edited by birddogsc on Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
WeatherLovingDoc
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3936 Postby WeatherLovingDoc » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:59 am

Oh my! Virginia just like the GFS yesterday (slightly more north if I recall it well enough).
Last edited by WeatherLovingDoc on Sun Sep 03, 2017 2:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2669
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3937 Postby USTropics » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:59 am

txwatcher91 wrote:
Langinbang187 wrote:The Euro has been absolutely embarrassing with Irma thus far. This is the "king" god ...what an embarrassment.


Not really, it has done excellent in the 5 day range and is what the NHC is heavily relying on. If you’re talking about more than 5 days out, well all models will struggle at that range, especially with a complex setup like this.


This was expected in the long range, model verification is lower when we have this type of setup aloft. Typhoon Sanvu has started to transition to extra-tropical, and will begin to influence the baroclinicity of the mid-latitude jet stream. I give the operational runs just slightly more weight then their ensemble members. Past 120 hours, it's all about trends and where we start to see clusters.
Last edited by USTropics on Sun Sep 03, 2017 2:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3938 Postby Steve » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:59 am

xtyphooncyclonex wrote:240 inland.... Virginia


ECMWF Fades NE and weakens rapidly after landfall. It's in its own camp for that solution. So EC with the Cat 4 hit next Monday if it stands. Night y'all.
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3939 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:59 am

Again like I mentioned once this wsw motion started.. I knew the models would start to swing more westerly.. now just watch if this drops even a little south of forecast it will cause a slow down resulting in the ridge building and more westerly. the Florida straights and gulf are still not out of the woods.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3863
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3940 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Sun Sep 03, 2017 2:00 am

Either a Donna or a Floyd.... unless the ridge's rebuilds earlier
0 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests