storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome
You're comparing the 00z from yesterday. This is a HUGE difference from the OTS track 12 hrs ago.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome
storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome
storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:Stronger ridge, no where to go but landfall
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome
You're comparing the 00z from yesterday. This is a HUGE difference from the OTS track 12 hrs ago.
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:storm4u wrote:Actually a tad east at 192AtlanticWind wrote:Big shift to the west over the 12z run though,these trends are worrisome
But the thing is, 12z showed Irma go OTS whereas 00z shows a NC/SC landfall.
Aric Dunn wrote:USTropics wrote:I don't see a turn yet on the high-res ECMWF, very close call though:
lol there is nothing but ridging building in.. gulf maybe ?
SouthFLTropics wrote:Jacksonville/New Bern/Morehead City Landfall
txwatcher91 wrote:Langinbang187 wrote:The Euro has been absolutely embarrassing with Irma thus far. This is the "king" god ...what an embarrassment.
Not really, it has done excellent in the 5 day range and is what the NHC is heavily relying on. If you’re talking about more than 5 days out, well all models will struggle at that range, especially with a complex setup like this.
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:240 inland.... Virginia
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests