WeatherHoon wrote:It baffles me how some people can make such definitive statements based off of a few model runs.
Yeah I agree. Now that these myriad of model outputs (in pretty graphical form so everyone can see it, analyze it) out to 400 hours into the future, it would be so nice to see some attempts at educating the public about error margins. I mean when two days ago when the GFS was showing a Mid-Atlantic Sandy-like landfall, people (not on here) were saying it was going to "track up the Chesapeake Bay and hit DC" because the model graphics are SO precise in their depiction of a storm track 300 hours away.