ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5961 Postby Blown Away » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:15 pm

stormreader wrote:
Steve wrote:12Z's are finished. JMA, CMC and NAVGEM like SW FL. GFS likes SFL. Euro is SE/coastal FL. Hurricane models don't go far enough out but are on/near Cuba 5 days. US Impacts beyond Puerto Rico (praying for a miss on y'all) are now just inside a week. Paranoia will set in. Get your stuff done while you can if you're in SFL.

I'm 95% convinced Irma will not be an out to sea storm. So even if it barely misses FL (ala ECMWF), it's going to come west eventually due to the Canadian block. ECMWF takes a different path inland than the GFS does and is more NW initially than later. It heads across the Smokys into Kentucky and finally hooks left into southern Indiana. GFS has been showing this high building since it started hitting Maryland 12 runs ago. So at some point in time, Irma has to come west eventually.

East window looks closed.


Storm E of 60W, that E door is never closed for Florida, but it's not looking good ATM...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5962 Postby Frank P » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:21 pm

gatorcane wrote:Latest 18Z:

Image


On that map it does look like the TVCN has shifted ever so slightly to the west to me...
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5963 Postby RL3AO » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:23 pm

UKMET did well to catch the SW shift, but I'm starting to think it's overdoing it now. I think the Euro/GFS track is spot on through 3 or 4 days.
5 likes   

User avatar
MetroMike
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 944
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: Tampa Bay
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5964 Postby MetroMike » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:25 pm

Bottom line is that model solutions will change between now and the weekend. All these close landfalls to the Florida coast mean nothing.
The final solutions will play out until the day of approach.
Everyone in the cone will have to prepare as though it's headed to their location of of course.
2 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5965 Postby ronjon » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:25 pm

If the tropical models are to be believed, the Euro is slow. Both HWRF and HMON have Irma near 80W in 126 hrs. Euro doesn't get there in 144 hrs. Second trend I picked on is the ECM is lifting out the trough a little sooner. This may have big implications with stronger ridge building in sooner.
1 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5966 Postby northjaxpro » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:25 pm

Frank P wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Latest 18Z:

Image


On that map it does look like the TVCN has shifted ever so slightly to the west to me...


Yes. TVCN nudged ever so slightly to the left.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9591
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5967 Postby Steve » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:25 pm

Blown Away wrote:
stormreader wrote:
Steve wrote:12Z's are finished. JMA, CMC and NAVGEM like SW FL. GFS likes SFL. Euro is SE/coastal FL. Hurricane models don't go far enough out but are on/near Cuba 5 days. US Impacts beyond Puerto Rico (praying for a miss on y'all) are now just inside a week. Paranoia will set in. Get your stuff done while you can if you're in SFL.

I'm 95% convinced Irma will not be an out to sea storm. So even if it barely misses FL (ala ECMWF), it's going to come west eventually due to the Canadian block. ECMWF takes a different path inland than the GFS does and is more NW initially than later. It heads across the Smokys into Kentucky and finally hooks left into southern Indiana. GFS has been showing this high building since it started hitting Maryland 12 runs ago. So at some point in time, Irma has to come west eventually.

East window looks closed.


Storm E of 60W, that E door is never closed for Florida, but it's not looking good ATM...


You're right. You should never say never which is why I only gave it 95%. But to stormreader's point, while a westward adjusting ECMWF shows an ultra-near miss to the east of Florida, I think the door is virtually closed on not hitting the continental US. The question to me is do we get 1 or 2 landfalls at this point. Unless something drastically changes upstream in Canada, I'm almost certain the US is going to get its 2nd major hurricane landfall of the season. Again,I hate the globals day 5-6-7, but there is just too good of agreement to ignore then with Irma at this point. They may shift and sway a little, and I was on record since last week saying wait til at least Tuesday. Models were off by 1000 miles then though.
Last edited by Steve on Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5968 Postby Ken711 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:26 pm

RL3AO wrote:UKMET did well to catch the SW shift, but I'm starting to think it's overdoing it now. I think the Euro/GFS track is spot on through 3 or 4 days.


Yes. UKMET seems too far South.
0 likes   

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5969 Postby OntarioEggplant » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:27 pm

Can I take this moment to remind everyone how the Euro severely underestimated the intensity of Harvey constantly. It never even really got close to the intensity, and it was already underestimating it by the time the model was actually coming out.

The GFS, though late to the party, was a bit closer in intensity though overshot a few times.
4 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5970 Postby Ken711 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:29 pm

OntarioEggplant wrote:Can I take this moment to remind everyone how the Euro severely underestimated the intensity of Harvey constantly. It never even really got close to the intensity, and it was already underestimating it by the time the model was actually coming out.

The GFS, though late to the party, was a bit closer in intensity though overshot a few times.


But Euro's track was much more accurate.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5971 Postby KWT » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:29 pm

RL3AO wrote:UKMET did well to catch the SW shift, but I'm starting to think it's overdoing it now. I think the Euro/GFS track is spot on through 3 or 4 days.


Yeah it has got a habit of overdoing the ridging somewhat at times, especially when it comes to breaking down the ridging. Kinda the opposite of the GFS. Still the reason it did well in the first place was because it locked onto the stronger ridge before other models. ECM also clocked it and to be fair the CMC was decent as well.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5972 Postby stormreader » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:30 pm

Steve wrote:
stormreader wrote:On discussion thread. Irma now a Cat 4.


Interestingly, HWRF, before the recent runs hit Cuba and stunted it, was rolling it continuously in Cat 4 territory. I'm sure it's happened a few times, but I don't recall any recent storms that stayed at Cat 4 for like 4-5 days straight. Usually there are eyewall interruptions and such where a storm will maybe degrade back to a 3 or whatever. Short of an encounter with Hispanola or Cuba, we are now potentially looking at a Cat 4 or Cat 5 hit on Florida in a week. Then we are looking at a Cat 2/3/? hit on SC or NC thereafter. The potential here is as big as it gets.


Can't give you specifics, but I found a steady-state 135 mph for an extended period of time is what one might expect with a powerful storm. Well, maybe use Hugo as an example??? After being a Cat 5, I seem to remember him in the 135mph range (consistently). Amazing in itself. Large and powerful.
1 likes   

Soonercane

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5973 Postby Soonercane » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:31 pm

OntarioEggplant wrote:Can I take this moment to remind everyone how the Euro severely underestimated the intensity of Harvey constantly. It never even really got close to the intensity, and it was already underestimating it by the time the model was actually coming out.

The GFS, though late to the party, was a bit closer in intensity though overshot a few times.


I would be stunned if this gets within 30 mb of the pressures depicted by the GFS it is in an ok environment, but not good enough to support a Cat 5.
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5974 Postby stormreader » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:31 pm

stormreader wrote:
Steve wrote:
stormreader wrote:On discussion thread. Irma now a Cat 4.


Interestingly, HWRF, before the recent runs hit Cuba and stunted it, was rolling it continuously in Cat 4 territory. I'm sure it's happened a few times, but I don't recall any recent storms that stayed at Cat 4 for like 4-5 days straight. Usually there are eyewall interruptions and such where a storm will maybe degrade back to a 3 or whatever. Short of an encounter with Hispanola or Cuba, we are now potentially looking at a Cat 4 or Cat 5 hit on Florida in a week. Then we are looking at a Cat 2/3/? hit on SC or NC thereafter. The potential here is as big as it gets.


Can't give you specifics, but I found a steady-state 135 mph for an extended period of time is what one might expect with a powerful storm. Well, maybe use Hugo as an example??? After being a Cat 5, I seem to remember him in the 135mph range (consistently). Amazing in itself. Large and powerful.

On second thought, he had to build back up to that speed. Wasn't there consistently.
1 likes   

CrazyTropics

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5975 Postby CrazyTropics » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:32 pm

Models really appear to slightly move to the right not left. Tjis mYbe a coastal east florida up to carolinas storm rather than anytjing
1 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4202
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5976 Postby South Texas Storms » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:32 pm

12z Euro Ensembles shifted slightly west from 0z. Mean is over the Keys Sunday afternoon.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5977 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:32 pm

Soonercane wrote:
OntarioEggplant wrote:Can I take this moment to remind everyone how the Euro severely underestimated the intensity of Harvey constantly. It never even really got close to the intensity, and it was already underestimating it by the time the model was actually coming out.

The GFS, though late to the party, was a bit closer in intensity though overshot a few times.


I would be stunned if this gets within 30 mb of the pressures depicted by the GFS it is in an ok environment, but not good enough to support a Cat 5.

I disagree. Look at the OHC/SST...will have high RH, no SAL, and minimal shear. Only thing to limit is EWRCs and land.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
canefan
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 37
Age: 57
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:15 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5978 Postby canefan » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:33 pm

I know IRMA is a very serious situation and I know this is the wrong thread, but why is no one, not even the models, paying attention to what is going on in the BOC!?
http://rammb-slider.cira.colostate.edu/?sat=goes-16&sec=conus&x=4091&y=6187&z=2&im=18&ts=1&st=0&et=0&speed=90&motion=loop&map=1&lat=0&p%5B0%5D=1&opacity%5B0%5D=1&hidden%5B0%5D=0&pause=0&slider=-1&hide_controls=0&mouse_draw=0&s=rammb-slider
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4202
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5979 Postby South Texas Storms » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:33 pm

12z Euro control run is slightly west of the operational run. Takes it over the Keys and up the Florida peninsula.
4 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5980 Postby stormreader » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:35 pm

South Texas Storms wrote:12z Euro Ensembles shifted slightly west from 0z. Mean is over the Keys Sunday afternoon.


And as much attention as there is for Miami, with the west shifts, the Keys are very much under the gun.
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests