ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6281 Postby Steve » Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:52 pm

North trend in HWRF's case is the worst trend because it misses Cuba. 929 at 117. After seeing perhaps the most extreme flooding hurricane of our time last week and a Top 3 all time, we may well witness another Top 5 hurricane of all time. Impacts count more than anything, so 2017 will climb the ladder per HWRF if it stays north of Cuba.

Ugh.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=300

120 hours and Irma is doing all she can to squeeze through the Straights intact. I've never quite seen this depiction of a storm. I bet it's insane on simulated IR4.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 418&fh=120
Last edited by Steve on Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6282 Postby ronjon » Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:54 pm

Looks like HWRF headed for the keys.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6283 Postby Steve » Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:56 pm

IR4 simulated just barely clips the N Coast of Cuba. Prayers out for them, but this is bad news.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=400
1 likes   

invest man
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:12 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6284 Postby invest man » Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:56 pm

Ken711 wrote:
GCANE wrote:
Ken711 wrote:
You mean an east trend?


Previous runs were landfalling on the GOM coast.

Now correlating real well with Euro.

I am pretty sure this nails it +/- 50 miles.


I have a feeling the next Euro run will stay off shore of FL and move a landfall further north to NC.


Why? I believe it will be very close to where it is at present unless the new info from balloon and g-Iv changes. Would like to know what makes you think that change will come! IM
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6285 Postby gatorcane » Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:58 pm

18Z HWRF ending frame. Turns it NNW at the end: :eek:

Image
1 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6286 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:01 pm

Image
GFS 18z 4th run. 10 metre wind streamline.

Image
1 likes   

caneseddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1172
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Plantation, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6287 Postby caneseddy » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:03 pm

Pretty much all models that had Irma heading into cubs (need to wait for UKMET) have now shifted north to off the Cuban coast, which is even more bad news for Florida

Hopefully the next runs with the data will make it clear but the fact that all the models are starting to converge in the same area is disconcerting
1 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6288 Postby RL3AO » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:04 pm



I was so confused about the southern hemisphere windbarbs, but then I saw it was Australian. :lol:
2 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6289 Postby ronjon » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:04 pm

18z HMON hits marathon with 871 mb at 126 hrs. Looks like its on its way to Naples.

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=119059&p=2626010#p2626010
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6290 Postby ROCK » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:04 pm

Steve wrote:IR4 simulated just barely clips the N Coast of Cuba. Prayers out for them, but this is bad news.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=400


Its the HWRF Steve...931 seems incredibly low given land interaction. Personally, the HWRF which was supposed to replace the GFDL back in the day is horrible with intensity. Always over blows a storm. I mean lets get real. 931MB?? Rita was 895MB I think at one point over the LC AND that was moving past any land. Not buying anything under 950MB at this point. Too much in the way.JMO...
1 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6291 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:08 pm

ROCK wrote:
Steve wrote:IR4 simulated just barely clips the N Coast of Cuba. Prayers out for them, but this is bad news.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=400


Its the HWRF Steve...931 seems incredibly low given land interaction. Personally, the HWRF which was supposed to replace the GFDL back in the day is horrible with intensity. Always over blows a storm. I mean lets get real. 931MB?? Rita was 895MB I think at one point over the LC AND that was moving past any land. Not buying anything under 950MB at this point. Too much in the way.JMO...


18Z HWRF has minimal land interaction. Its intensity forecasts have dramatically improved over the past couple of years. It is one of the best intensity models the NHC has right now. I think 931 mb is very reasonable.
6 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6292 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:09 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:
ROCK wrote:
Steve wrote:IR4 simulated just barely clips the N Coast of Cuba. Prayers out for them, but this is bad news.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=400


Its the HWRF Steve...931 seems incredibly low given land interaction. Personally, the HWRF which was supposed to replace the GFDL back in the day is horrible with intensity. Always over blows a storm. I mean lets get real. 931MB?? Rita was 895MB I think at one point over the LC AND that was moving past any land. Not buying anything under 950MB at this point. Too much in the way.JMO...


18Z HWRF has minimal land interaction. Its intensity forecasts have dramatically improved over the past couple of years. It is one of the best intensity models the NHC has right now. I think 931 mb is very reasonable.


Given its size at that point, 931 would likely be a borderline 3-4.
0 likes   

User avatar
robbielyn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 9:45 am
Location: brooksville, fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6293 Postby robbielyn » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:09 pm

ROCK wrote:
Steve wrote:IR4 simulated just barely clips the N Coast of Cuba. Prayers out for them, but this is bad news.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=400


Its the HWRF Steve...931 seems incredibly low given land interaction. Personally, the HWRF which was supposed to replace the GFDL back in the day is horrible with intensity. Always over blows a storm. I mean lets get real. 931MB?? Rita was 895MB I think at one point over the LC AND that was moving past any land. Not buying anything under 950MB at this point. Too much in the way.JMO...

don't discount the gulf stream and the sst's
0 likes   
Robbielyn McCrary
I know just about enough to sound like I know what I'm talking about sometimes. But for your safety please follow the nhc for truly professional forecasting. :D

caneseddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1172
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Plantation, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6294 Postby caneseddy » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:10 pm

Pretty much all models that had Irma heading into cubs (need to wait for UKMET) have now shifted north to off the Cuban coast, which is even more bad news for Florida

Hopefully the next runs with the data will make it clear but the fact that all the models are starting to converge in the same area is disconcerting
0 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6295 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:10 pm

RL3AO wrote:


I was so confused about the southern hemisphere windbarbs, but then I saw it was Australian. :lol:


Those are hires GFS charts on the 10 metre graphic. Whats wrong with Aussie data.
They lead the world in most scientific fields.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6296 Postby ROCK » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:10 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:
ROCK wrote:
Steve wrote:IR4 simulated just barely clips the N Coast of Cuba. Prayers out for them, but this is bad news.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=400


Its the HWRF Steve...931 seems incredibly low given land interaction. Personally, the HWRF which was supposed to replace the GFDL back in the day is horrible with intensity. Always over blows a storm. I mean lets get real. 931MB?? Rita was 895MB I think at one point over the LC AND that was moving past any land. Not buying anything under 950MB at this point. Too much in the way.JMO...


18Z HWRF has minimal land interaction. Its intensity forecasts have dramatically improved over the past couple of years. It is one of the best intensity models the NHC has right now. I think 931 mb is very reasonable.


well we agree to disagree...:) you almost need pristine conditions...not half the storm over a land shredder...:)
1 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6297 Postby tolakram » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:10 pm

I'm having a hard time believing intensity estimates. Of course it could happen but some of these models seem a tad overdone.
4 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6298 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:11 pm

WeatherHoon wrote:
sma10 wrote:
gatorcane wrote:18Z GFS ensembles split into two camps:

https://s26.postimg.org/zbw5sya2x/gfs-e ... atl_24.png


...and they have been in these two camps for awhile strangely.

Scary run for SFL, but if you're looking for good news, at least there seemed to be a subtle early shift to the north and northwest. Perhaps the start of a trend? Or was it not a true shift, but rather just a speeding up of forward speed?


Not sure if slight adjustments to the W/NW would matter that much. It looks like it's coming down to where it stops its WEST/WNW movement before the straight shot North.
that striaght shot north seems suspect, in realty we probably see something a bit less drastic but will see when the time of reckoning comes this weekend
1 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6299 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:11 pm

Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:
RL3AO wrote:


I was so confused about the southern hemisphere windbarbs, but then I saw it was Australian. :lol:


Those are hires GFS charts on the 10 metre graphic.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6300 Postby RL3AO » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:11 pm

Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:Those are hires GFS charts on the 10 metre graphic. Whats wrong with Aussie data.
They lead the world in most scientific fields.


The sounding has southern hemisphere windbarbs on them. It just caught my eye.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Stormybajan and 17 guests