ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3521 Postby ronyan » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:12 am

I'll go 927 mb on the next recon.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34093
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3522 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:13 am

RL3AO wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
RL3AO wrote:Four hours until the next center fix. I'll predict 932 mb.


I will predict 920mb and category 5.


18 mb in 4 hours?


Yes, I think this is the main RI'ing period.
0 likes   

Langinbang187

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3523 Postby Langinbang187 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:13 am

933 next recon.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34093
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3524 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:13 am

UW - CIMSS
ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE
ADT-Version 8.2.1
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 05 SEP 2017 Time : 041500 UTC
Lat : 16:39:38 N Lon : 55:59:04 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
6.7 / 932.8mb/132.2kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
6.7 7.0 7.0

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 22 km

Center Temp : +8.9C Cloud Region Temp : -73.4C

Scene Type : EYE

Positioning Method : RING/SPIRAL COMBINATION

Ocean Basin : ATLANTIC
Dvorak CI > MSLP Conversion Used : CKZ Method

Tno/CI Rules : Constraint Limits : NO LIMIT
Weakening Flag : OFF
Rapid Dissipation Flag : OFF

C/K/Z MSLP Estimate Inputs :
- Average 34 knot radii : N/A
- Environmental MSLP : 1012mb

Satellite Name : GOES13
Satellite Viewing Angle : 29.3 degrees
0 likes   

User avatar
FireRat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1248
Age: 38
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:38 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3525 Postby FireRat » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:13 am

I'll go with 931 mb for the next fix
0 likes   
Georges '98, Irene '99, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Katrina '05, Wilma '05, Gustav '08, Isaac '12, Matthew '16, Florence '18, Michael '18, Ian '22

User avatar
Evenstar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3526 Postby Evenstar » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:14 am

brghteys1216 wrote:
otowntiger wrote:
sponger wrote:
Its a personal decision but I would stay unless on coast and getting surge or peak eyewall. This will lose some steam and I would be shocked if you had anything above Cat2. Evac has risk as well so do not let panic get the better of you.
according to the GFS run, which appears to be way over doing the intensity, but if it verified, and that of course is a big if we in orlando would be just a few Miles east of the center (dirty side) of a 941mb hurricane. Again if that verified we could be getting strong cat three gusts. But regardless I think you'd be fine staying away from windows- but the aftermath would be worse- no power for days, difficulty getting out and about, just a few crowded gas stations open, etc. very limited food options, etc.


I'm going to find a friend to stay with so I'm not alone since spouse is going to be staying in Disney's Animal Kingdom for 72 hours should they activate the ride out crews.


I hope Disney has better back up systems than Jurassic Park...
4 likes   
I never received my Hogwarts letter, so I'm leaving the Shire and becoming a Sith Lord.

Chris90
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 646
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:36 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3527 Postby Chris90 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:15 am

I'm thinking 929 mb for the next recon fix.
0 likes   
Solar Aquarian
Lunar Cancerian
:uarrow: Sagittarian

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34093
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3528 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:15 am

Chris90 wrote:I too think this is about to hit cat 5 within the next few hours.

Based off current trends and the models, it's looking like Harvey and Irma are an old married couple. Back to back retirements. I really hope not though.

Thoughts and prayers for all those in the path. I hope everyone is prepared and have their plan in place. Irma is looking determined.


There have only been seven back-to-back retirements among named storms:

1955 - Connie and Diane
1955 - Ione and Janet
1964 - Cleo and Dora
1995 - Luis and Marilyn
2003 - Isabel and Juan
2004 - Ivan and Jeanne
2005 - Rita and Stan

There have never been three consecutive retirements though.
3 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3529 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:17 am

RL3AO wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
RL3AO wrote:Four hours until the next center fix. I'll predict 932 mb.


I will predict 920mb and category 5.


18 mb in 4 hours?


its possible..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9326
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3530 Postby Sciencerocks » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:21 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
RL3AO wrote:Four hours until the next center fix. I'll predict 932 mb.


yeah, with that convection developing could be a lot lower..



I think this is pulling a Katrina but east of the islands. It should look similar too with a large eye!

I'll predict 925mb by 8am est and 930mb by next recon. I don't dare predict lower but it could.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34093
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3531 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:25 am

Sciencerocks wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
RL3AO wrote:Four hours until the next center fix. I'll predict 932 mb.


yeah, with that convection developing could be a lot lower..



I think this is pulling a Katrina but east of the islands. It should look similar too with a large eye!

I'll predict 925mb by 8am est and 930mb by next recon. I don't dare predict lower but it could.


If this is intensifying really early, this could end up struggling a bit in the days ahead due to so many ERC's and structural issues?
1 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3532 Postby 1900hurricane » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:26 am

I might be getting a little nit-picky with regards to structure, but something still doesn't look/seem quite right to me. The eye has still failed to completely clear out and become perfectly circular and the coldest clout tops are having a hard time rotating into the north side of the CDO. I wonder if some residual dry air managed to munch into the northern eyewall just a little bit. Not by much or enough to open the eyewall, but enough to weaken it a little bit. The METOP-B pass from a little while back did show the northern eyewall as the weakest portion with some dry air nearby. Regardless, it'll probably just slow the rate of intensification a slight bit.

Image
4 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3533 Postby RL3AO » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:27 am

CrazyC83 wrote:If this is intensifying really early, this could end up struggling a bit in the days ahead due to so many ERC's and structural issues?


I think it's gonna fluctuate between 120kts or so during EWRCs and make runs at cat 5 after completing them.
6 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15469
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3534 Postby NDG » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:28 am

1900hurricane wrote:I might be getting a little nit-picky with regards to structure, but something still doesn't look/seem quite right to me. The eye has still failed to completely clear out and become perfectly circular and the coldest clout tops are having a hard time rotating into the north side of the CDO. I wonder if some residual dry air managed to munch into the northern eyewall just a little bit. Not by much or enough to open the eyewall, but enough to weaken it a little bit. The METOP-B pass from a little while back did show the northern eyewall as the weakest portion with some dry air nearby. Regardless, it'll probably just slow the rate of intensification a slight bit.

https://i.imgur.com/gzWOMSz.jpg


Hard to agree when the image is more than 4 hours old, it could had changed by now.
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3535 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:30 am

too bad recon is headed home.. really would have like to see the progreassion.. oh well.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2990
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3536 Postby Bocadude85 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:30 am

Hurricane conditions now showing up in my extended range forecast from the NWS Miami

http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?x=264&y=87&site=mfl&zmx=&zmy=&map_x=264&map_y=87#.Wa42FNEpDxw
0 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3537 Postby 1900hurricane » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:33 am

I think I'll go in the 935-938 mb range for the next fix.
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3538 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:39 am

I always buy 1900hurricane's analysis, don't see many better anywhere on the net.
1 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3400
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3539 Postby tropicwatch » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:39 am

The northern eye wall does appear to have some weakness but wow, overall Irma is getting its act together.

Image
1 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#3540 Postby wxmann_91 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:41 am

1900hurricane wrote:I might be getting a little nit-picky with regards to structure, but something still doesn't look/seem quite right to me. The eye has still failed to completely clear out and become perfectly circular and the coldest clout tops are having a hard time rotating into the north side of the CDO. I wonder if some residual dry air managed to munch into the northern eyewall just a little bit. Not by much or enough to open the eyewall, but enough to weaken it a little bit. The METOP-B pass from a little while back did show the northern eyewall as the weakest portion with some dry air nearby. Regardless, it'll probably just slow the rate of intensification a slight bit.

[im g]https://i.imgur.com/gzWOMSz.jpg[/img]


This. Irma hasn't been able to clear the eye out yet, perhaps because of this reason. It will strengthen, but this might prevent a full run at Cat 5 or RI tonight.

Also, any weaknesses in the current eyewall might hasten the start of the next ERC.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests