ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
KBBOCA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:27 am
Location: Formerly Boca Raton, often West Africa. Currently Charlotte NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8281 Postby KBBOCA » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:52 pm

Centralflamama wrote:All of Florida decimated? That's pretty intense :( hopefully our house makes it, we weren't told to evacuate.


Stay safe CentralFL Mamma!
2 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8282 Postby stormreader » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:55 pm

[i mmg]http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/11L/imagery/vis-animated.gif[/img]

Images show storm moving WNW. Last image shows a west wobble. But you can see that there should be more of a north wobble after that. The next north wobble is going to get the storm to the point that it looks like it won't make a landfall in Cuba. Becoming more likely I think that Irma does stay north of the Cuban coast (and maybe by a few miles).
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8283 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:55 pm

KBBOCA - and three of those major landfalls came within 2 years of each other!

Looks pretty steady right now, not long to go until landfall in Cuba, still heading pretty much due west. May help to weaken Irma somewhat but it should still emerge a major hurricane.

PS, looking at the 1 min loops, its been heading near due west, any apparent north wobbles are purely due to the inner eyewall decaying away and opening up a bigger eye given the illusion of a slight north jump. Probably 275.
Last edited by KWT on Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8284 Postby meriland29 » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:56 pm

stormreader wrote:[im g]http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/11L/imagery/vis-animated.gif[/img]

Images show storm moving WNW. Last image shows a west wobble. But you can see that there should be more of a north wobble after that. The next north wobble is going to get the storm to the point that it looks like it won't make a landfall in Cuba. Becoming more likely I think that Irma does stay north of the Cuban coast (and maybe by a few miles).



Her eye looks to be realy clearing out the last few frames
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8285 Postby Steve » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:57 pm

Stangfriik wrote:
Stangfriik wrote:Apologies for the lack of proper terminology but that front or whatever it is thats bringing us rain in New Smyrna right now seems to extend all the way to the gulf. Does this affect the steering pattern of Irma?


Boards moving to fast lol. Curious if someone could answer this


Yes. It will block the storm from coming into the NC/NW Gulf. It's a trough with a big area of high pressure behind it. Last several days here were low 80's with nights low-mid 60's. That doesn't usually happen until start of fall or later unless we get under some random rainy pattern (and the nights would still stay in the 70's). It will help draw up the system eventually but the high pressure coming in from the NW will keep it from going east and out. Run your favorite model at 500mb or 200mb and you can see how it predicts it will work. Here are some examples:

12Z European at 500mb (anomalies):
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=500

12Z GFS 250mb winds and stream flow:
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=198
Last edited by Steve on Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8286 Postby stormreader » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:57 pm

stormreader wrote:[i mg]http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/11L/imagery/vis-animated.gif[/img]

Images show storm moving WNW. Last image shows a west wobble. But you can see that there should be more of a north wobble after that. The next north wobble is going to get the storm to the point that it looks like it won't make a landfall in Cuba. Becoming more likely I think that Irma does stay north of the Cuban coast (and maybe by a few miles).

Now, thats assuming the land interaction around higher terrain doesn't actually pull Irma more south into the coastal areas. It has been known to happen around higher terrain.
1 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8287 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:59 pm

RL3AO wrote:
SoupBone wrote:When's the last time the U.S. had a cat 5 landfall? Most weaken before they hit.


Andrew. Labor Day (Florida Keys) and Camille are the others.


I'm really hoping the outcome of this won't be worse than hurricane Andrew
0 likes   

norva
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:41 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8288 Postby norva » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:00 pm

Is a Cuba landfall certain now?
0 likes   

KBBOCA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:27 am
Location: Formerly Boca Raton, often West Africa. Currently Charlotte NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8289 Postby KBBOCA » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:01 pm

Latest from NWS Miami

Wind threat still extreme for all of South FLorida
Storm Surge threat: high-extreme
Flooding threat high for all of South Florida
Tornado risk: moderate

 https://twitter.com/NWSMiami/status/906273750148100098




Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8290 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:01 pm

stormreader wrote:
stormreader wrote:[i mg]http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/11L/imagery/vis-animated.gif[/img]

Images show storm moving WNW. Last image shows a west wobble. But you can see that there should be more of a north wobble after that. The next north wobble is going to get the storm to the point that it looks like it won't make a landfall in Cuba. Becoming more likely I think that Irma does stay north of the Cuban coast (and maybe by a few miles).

Now, thats assuming the land interaction around higher terrain doesn't actually pull Irma more south into the coastal areas. It has been known to happen around higher terrain.


Yeah it certainly could happen.

Going to be a close run thing but motion is around 275 at the moment, probably just south enough for a landfall in Cuba. Not going to get too deep I suspect but its going to need a decent north wobble now to move north enough to move away from N.Cuba.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20020
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8291 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:02 pm

norva wrote:Is a Cuba landfall certain now?


Nope, very close brush but may stay just offshore.
1 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2432
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8292 Postby Shell Mound » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:02 pm

The movement of an intense, steady or deepening hurricane along the northern coast of Cuba is very reminiscent of Isidore's (2002) paralleling the northern Yucatán. In both cases, the land mass is too flat, at least in part, to effectively weaken a large and intense tropical cyclone, and in fact may help focus inflow into the eye, a phenomenon known as frictional convergence. Both Cuba and the Yucatán are effectively surrounded by water; though Cuba is an island and the Yucatán a peninsula, both are insulated from continental sources of dry air such as the Sonoran desert, so storms can intensify up until landfall or while interacting with either land mass. History shows this: the number of intensifiers up until Yucatán landfall—e.g., Janet 1955, Dean 2007—and the storied history of intense Cuban strikes such as in 1846, 1924, 1926, 1944, 1952, etc. (these are just the cases that strengthened up until landfall). Plus, the Yucatán is not mountainous at all, and Cuba's mountainous terrain is restricted to the eastern portion of the island, Oriente, while the central and western portions are quite flat, akin to a hillier, more tropical version of Florida. Finally, Irma is most likely to make landfall on the outer archipelago, the chain of islands just north of mainland Cuba. With access to the inflow from the Caribbean to the south, and a large, well-defined, vertically stacked circulation in place, the intense inner core of the cyclone should not suffer much, if at all, from interaction with the central and western portions of Cuba.
4 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1115
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8293 Postby Michele B » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:03 pm

ROCK wrote:
fci wrote:
ROCK wrote:yeah the west movement has stopped to me and I suspect the models were picking up on this jog and shifted west to compensate. Would not be surprised if they swung a tad east now on tonight's runs with Gonzo flying. Personally, until the NWS can pin point an actual track they are going on best guess in winds for Miami. If she does shift east those forecasts will need to be amended to show increased impacts....JMO...


Are you getting a feel for a shift a bit east or is it becoming established that the westward movement has sealed the west movement from today to be firm?


My feel really doesn't count. The NWS NHC is what matters However given I do have an opinion on track..lol I am leaning dead center up the spine of FL...Stormgeo track similar...and yes slowing down due to reaching the end of the ridge...NW then N movement upcoming sooner rather than later..JMO..personally all of FL is about to be decimated and parts uninhabitable...JMHO..


That's my feeling, too, that the slower forward speed means the shift in direction is coming....sooner rather than later will mean more to the east.

Sorry - west side of the state here - and I'm rooting for a more eastern shift.

:P
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8294 Postby SoupBone » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:04 pm

norva wrote:Is a Cuba landfall certain now?


The NHC track has shifted to right on Cuba then slowly lifting up toward the Keys.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

KBBOCA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:27 am
Location: Formerly Boca Raton, often West Africa. Currently Charlotte NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8295 Postby KBBOCA » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:04 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8296 Postby SoupBone » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:04 pm

tolakram wrote:
norva wrote:Is a Cuba landfall certain now?


Nope, very close brush but may stay just offshore.


Unless the slider is off, it brings at least half the eye on top of Cuba.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8297 Postby Steve » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:05 pm

norva wrote:Is a Cuba landfall certain now?


No. Maybe some of the barrier islands on the north side, but run the visible.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... imated.gif

If it doesn't, and we're getting to the low 920's already with likely intensification tomorrow evening, we could be in the 9-teens before landfall. Very, very low.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8298 Postby PTPatrick » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:06 pm

Yeah I just did a little extrapolation of its most recent trajectory over last 6 hrs...it appears it will cross 22.5 until maybe 78. If that continued it would eventually brush those islands but still not run onshore totally. The islands look flat. Still think she will get above 23 before running into the island totally.


And if you look at next 3 nhc points the next is on that island Cayo Romano but then the next 2 keep over water. Again it's semantics at this point, unless she goes west of points, which she could. But nhc track is basically water.
Last edited by PTPatrick on Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8299 Postby SoupBone » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:06 pm

Steve wrote:
norva wrote:Is a Cuba landfall certain now?


No. Maybe some of the barrier islands on the north side, but run the visible.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... imated.gif

If it doesn't, and we're getting to the low 920's already with likely intensification tomorrow evening, we could be in the 9-teens before landfall. Very, very low.


You're right, that was tough to see. Sorry Tolka.

How many miles from mainland Cuba do you think that is? If only a few more miles West, maybe a little land interaction on that eye.
Last edited by SoupBone on Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

KBBOCA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:27 am
Location: Formerly Boca Raton, often West Africa. Currently Charlotte NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#8300 Postby KBBOCA » Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:06 pm

NWS KeyWest just retweeted this, so it obviously has their stamp of approval...

 https://twitter.com/StevenCejas/status/906271647426113537




EDIT: the text of the tweet gives a quote from NHC about the Keys: NHC: "It's not clear that it's a survivable situation for anybody that is still there in the Keys"
Last edited by KBBOCA on Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests