Nimbus wrote:The models may be initialized differently after this mornings recon, shear has really pulled the low level center quite a bit further east than the models had predicted.
I'm looking back at the Monday May 21st 12Z run for both Euro and GFS via Tropical Tidbits.
I think both handled it pretty well, especially the GFS with the multiple center signatures. If the current track holds the GFS was too far right the euro a little left (but landfall location pretty close). Because the GFS brought it over Florida there was no strengthening. Once again, the euro appears to do much better but without the GFS the track would be too far left. Even going back to the 12z runs on Saturday May 19th, if you split the difference between the GFS up the east coast of Florida and the Euro, you would have a decent landfall location in the panhandle. I assume this is why the Florida super ensembles and the blended model are so critical to forecasting since they can put error weights on each model and come up with a pretty good track.
The new GFS was even better, though timing is off:
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=fv3p®ion=atl&pkg=z850_vort&runtime=2018051912&fh=216I'd also like to point out this is why the GFS bashing looks pretty silly at times. It's not as good as the euro, it's certainly the second (UKMet maybe???) best global model we have at the moment, but it's not trash.
It will be interesting to see how fast Alberto consolidates, I'm hoping both are over estimating intensity ... it's May after all.