Cpv17 wrote:We have 50 pages on a wave that’s not even an invest yet
Is that a new record?
Edit: never mind, I just read Cycloneyes post
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Cpv17 wrote:We have 50 pages on a wave that’s not even an invest yet
AnnularCane wrote:Who predicted 20/50?
cycloneye wrote:20%/50%Disorganized showers and thunderstorms over the southeastern and
central Bahamas, the Turks and Caicos Islands, and adjacent
Atlantic waters are associated with a tropical wave and an
upper-level trough. This activity is expected to move
west-northwestward across the remainder of the Bahamas and south
Florida during the next day or so and little, if any, development
is expected during that time due to strong upper-level winds.
Environmental conditions are expected to become a little more
favorable for development when the system moves across the Gulf of
Mexico, where a tropical depression could form during the early to
middle part of next week. Regardless of development, heavy rains
are likely across much of the Bahamas and southern Florida during
the next day or two. See products from your local weather forecast
office for more information.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...20 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...medium...50 percent.
[]https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/xgtwo/two_atl_5d1.png[/img]
AnnularCane wrote:Who predicted 20/50?
ForexTidbits wrote:12Z ECMWF rainfall totals for anyone that wants to see it.
https://weather.us/model-charts/euro/2018090112/usa/acc-total-precipitation/20180909-1200z.html
tailgater wrote:ForexTidbits wrote:12Z ECMWF rainfall totals for anyone that wants to see it.
https://weather.us/model-charts/euro/2018090112/usa/acc-total-precipitation/20180909-1200z.html
We really need a dislike button or thumbs down That rainfall total map looks like what we went through 2 years ago.
Cpv17 wrote:Just an observation I’ve made, but there’s an area of disturbed weather over the Gulf right now that’s supposed to go into Texas over the next couple days. If the pattern stays the same, wouldn’t this disturbance work it’s way in that direction as well?
NDG wrote:So in another words, they are only giving the GFS & Euro a 50% chance coming to fruition with both models showing at least a TD making landfall in less than 4 days
SoupBone wrote:NDG wrote:So in another words, they are only giving the GFS & Euro a 50% chance coming to fruition with both models showing at least a TD making landfall in less than 4 days
I'm obviously no pro, but does declaring an invest free up additional forecasting/data gathering resources (like recon)? If it does, it seems like this whole setup could benefit from having it declared.
Ian2401 wrote:https://i.imgur.com/yWtun5e.png
Shear on the decline over the disturbance
SoupBone wrote:NDG wrote:So in another words, they are only giving the GFS & Euro a 50% chance coming to fruition with both models showing at least a TD making landfall in less than 4 days
I'm obviously no pro, but does declaring an invest free up additional forecasting/data gathering resources (like recon)? If it does, it seems like this whole setup could benefit from having it declared. If not, then it really doesn't matter I guess. Where's all the pros that usually post here?![]()
So far, I only see Dylan.
tolakram wrote:SoupBone wrote:NDG wrote:So in another words, they are only giving the GFS & Euro a 50% chance coming to fruition with both models showing at least a TD making landfall in less than 4 days
I'm obviously no pro, but does declaring an invest free up additional forecasting/data gathering resources (like recon)? If it does, it seems like this whole setup could benefit from having it declared.
An invest may have been declared already and we don't know it per the change made 2 years ago. We won't know until a best track file is created.
cycloneye wrote:tolakram wrote:SoupBone wrote:
I'm obviously no pro, but does declaring an invest free up additional forecasting/data gathering resources (like recon)? If it does, it seems like this whole setup could benefit from having it declared.
An invest may have been declared already and we don't know it per the change made 2 years ago. We won't know until a best track file is created.
Yes.They many time do tests of Best Track files but are only tests like 75L,76L, 80L-81L etc.When you see the 90,s show up then here we go with the designation.
gatorcane wrote:Floater loop. Looks like the spin is getting going with convection all around it. Is it me or does the shear not look that bad?
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12
Users browsing this forum: cycloneye and 41 guests