ATL: MICHAEL - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
I'm not sure that's another center, maybe a mid level circulation/vortex, pressure is much higher in this area.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2434
- Age: 32
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
AutoPenalti wrote:That’s pretty interesting, if anything that may explain the east shift from the Euro
I believe that the reconnaissance data from the latest pass came too late for the 00Z ECMWF to initialise.
0 likes
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
The new data would likely support a 55 kt intensity.
1 likes
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Have the most recent recon pass suggested significant forward motion commencing?
0 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
CrazyC83 wrote:The new data would likely support a 55 kt intensity.
well if we ever get the rest of the data lol
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:The new data would likely support a 55 kt intensity.
well if we ever get the rest of the data lol
Recon pilot and on-board Met must be oblivious that I really need my beauty sleep

3 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
chaser1 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:The new data would likely support a 55 kt intensity.
well if we ever get the rest of the data lol
Recon pilot and on-board Met must be oblivious that I really need my beauty sleep
They're killing me here. Come on, just some numbers. Please.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4030
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Shell Mound wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:That’s pretty interesting, if anything that may explain the east shift from the Euro
I believe that the reconnaissance data from the latest pass came too late for the 00Z ECMWF to initialise.
That’s true but I mean in terms of it’s future track. IF it actually turns out that recon found another center that’s not mid level.
Last edited by AutoPenalti on Mon Oct 08, 2018 1:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
HDGator wrote:chaser1 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
well if we ever get the rest of the data lol
Recon pilot and on-board Met must be oblivious that I really need my beauty sleep
They're killing me here. Come on, just some numbers. Please.
I'm practically laying on the F5 key at this point

2 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2434
- Age: 32
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
AutoPenalti wrote:Shell Mound wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:That’s pretty interesting, if anything that may explain the east shift from the Euro
I believe that the reconnaissance data from the latest pass came too late for the 00Z ECMWF to initialise.
That’s true but I mean in terms of it’s future track. If it actually turns out that recon found another center that’s not mid level.
The data still came in too late to affect the track and intensity on the 00Z ECMWF. The model was running several hours prior to the latest pass.
1 likes
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
- Condor
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:10 pm
- Location: International Space Station
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Shell Mound wrote:I prefer to look at real-time conditions rather than models, especially in the short term, and to compare (current, unfolding) observations and (model) forecasts, including verification. The 00Z HWRF convective fields show lopsided, bursting thunderstorm activity until about a day before landfall. You can see the "pulsing" pattern, frame by frame, over time. This kind of evolution does favour intensification, but gradual rather than exponential. Yet the HWRF pressure fields show much more rapid near-term deepening than the convective fields (based on large-scale environmental shear) would suggest. Currently, Michael is a disorganised system. Reconnaissance data confirm that the pressure has only dropped slightly since the last pass. The dynamical models suggest that the most rapid intensification may occur within a day of landfall, as northwesterly shear diminishes and a poleward, pre-frontal outflow channel expands. Until then, the shear fields on the models indicate that the system will struggle to achieve more than slow but steady intensification. The current convective pattern is consistent with a highly sheared, broad tropical storm of moderate intensity. A broad core and wind field suggest that Michael will struggle to intensify significantly, even as environmental conditions improve just before landfall.
I prefer to look at real-time conditions rather than models, especially in the short term, and to compare (current, unfolding) observations and (model) forecasts, including verification.
If that is the case then your whole statement contradicts how you asses the development. Your whole statement is based on future conditions which have yet to arise. Also if you look at the current conditions you will see a massive burst in convention and a eye that is starting to become more defined.
2 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
73 kt FL peak and 60kt SFMR Surface Level Peak in last Recon data that I saw well Northeast of center of circulation. Guess I'm going to have to stay up for the pass back through the center.
2 likes
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Condor wrote:Shell Mound wrote:I prefer to look at real-time conditions rather than models, especially in the short term, and to compare (current, unfolding) observations and (model) forecasts, including verification. The 00Z HWRF convective fields show lopsided, bursting thunderstorm activity until about a day before landfall. You can see the "pulsing" pattern, frame by frame, over time. This kind of evolution does favour intensification, but gradual rather than exponential. Yet the HWRF pressure fields show much more rapid near-term deepening than the convective fields (based on large-scale environmental shear) would suggest. Currently, Michael is a disorganised system. Reconnaissance data confirm that the pressure has only dropped slightly since the last pass. The dynamical models suggest that the most rapid intensification may occur within a day of landfall, as northwesterly shear diminishes and a poleward, pre-frontal outflow channel expands. Until then, the shear fields on the models indicate that the system will struggle to achieve more than slow but steady intensification. The current convective pattern is consistent with a highly sheared, broad tropical storm of moderate intensity. A broad core and wind field suggest that Michael will struggle to intensify significantly, even as environmental conditions improve just before landfall.I prefer to look at real-time conditions rather than models, especially in the short term, and to compare (current, unfolding) observations and (model) forecasts, including verification.
If that is the case then your whole statement contradicts how you asses the development. Your whole statement is based on future conditions which have yet to arise. Also if you look at the current conditions you will see a massive burst in convention and a eye that is starting to become more defined.
Alright, enough folks. Let's not get carried away by each person's opinions and perceptions.
Back to Michael.... I don't see any warm spot or appearance of an eye? I will admit though, that the overall CDO seems to certainly be expanding and likely extending west thus pulling the COC deeper within. I swear though, the only forward motion that I can detect is primarily to the west.
2 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
HDGator wrote:73 kt FL peak and 60kt SFMR Surface Level Peak in last Recon data that I saw well Northeast of center of circulation. Guess I'm going to have to stay up for the pass back through the center.
thats not far from the new center that likely has formed east of the first VDM.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- Condor
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:10 pm
- Location: International Space Station
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
HDGator wrote:73 kt FL peak and 60kt SFMR Surface Level Peak in last Recon data that I saw well Northeast of center of circulation. Guess I'm going to have to stay up for the pass back through the center.
Looking like 73 KT and 991mb
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:HDGator wrote:73 kt FL peak and 60kt SFMR Surface Level Peak in last Recon data that I saw well Northeast of center of circulation. Guess I'm going to have to stay up for the pass back through the center.
thats not far from the new center that likely has formed east of the first VDM.
"east of" lol? Oh jeeeez, I must be sleepy (or punch drunk). If a further east COC has formed, then it must be damn near the middle of the expanding CDO because the entire envelope appears to be moving (or expanding) to the west.
0 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
chaser1 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:HDGator wrote:73 kt FL peak and 60kt SFMR Surface Level Peak in last Recon data that I saw well Northeast of center of circulation. Guess I'm going to have to stay up for the pass back through the center.
thats not far from the new center that likely has formed east of the first VDM.
"east of" lol? Oh jeeeez, I must be sleepy (or punch drunk). If a further east COC has formed, then it must be damn near the middle of the expanding CDO because the entire envelope appears to be moving (or expanding) to the west.
yes see my post earlier or check the recon data.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: MICHAEL - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:HDGator wrote:73 kt FL peak and 60kt SFMR Surface Level Peak in last Recon data that I saw well Northeast of center of circulation. Guess I'm going to have to stay up for the pass back through the center.
thats not far from the new center that likely has formed east of the first VDM.
It may still take a little while for the new center to form, the circulation still looks elliptical shaped.
I think it may form to the NE later this morning.
3 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests