wxman57 wrote:Speaking of how models have been performing (we are now), I posted a comparison of 500 mb flow in the 240hr forecast from the 12Z Dec. 26th ECMWF & GFS (original image here -
http://wxman57.com/images/EC-GFS.JPG).
Here was my post:
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?p=2730641#p2730641Well, those two 240hr forecasts were for this Friday evening. Euro had a deep upper low over south TX, but the GFS had a trof much farther east with a ridge over Texas. Looking at the 60 hr EC & GFS forecasts today, the Euro was way off in the position of the upper low as it is now predicted to be over central Tennessee vs. south TX. GFS still has a trof there across the SE U.S, but may be too weak with the upper low. Euro now has a ridge over Texas Friday evening, as per the 10-day GFS on Dec. 26th.
Bottom line is that you should be very careful believing any forecast beyond 3-5 days. Models aren't handling the pattern well.
First of all, Happy New Year!
Let me be blunt here, I'm good at that, my beloved heat miser is being very nice.
DO NOT BELIEVE ON MODEL OUTPUT BEYOND 3-5 DAYS, they are more wrong than right, and will significantly change run to run. There are rare circumstances where they will be close, but most of the time, they are wrong. Why do you think the NWS does not issue a 14 day forecast, since the models go out that far? If you carefully read the the AFD's , you will see where the pro mets lose confidence beyond five days. You will see commentary like "in the extended (meaning 5-7 days) models have a trough coming through, broadly brushed low end pops" - they don't put much faith > 5 days in the models either.
The above post and any post by dhweather is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.