South Texas Storms wrote:With the Great Lakes trough trending stronger, chances for a TX landfall have decreased today. I'm feeling better here in Houston, as Louisiana looks like the likely landfall spot.
Would that mean less time over water?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
South Texas Storms wrote:With the Great Lakes trough trending stronger, chances for a TX landfall have decreased today. I'm feeling better here in Houston, as Louisiana looks like the likely landfall spot.
Kazmit wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:With the Great Lakes trough trending stronger, chances for a TX landfall have decreased today. I'm feeling better here in Houston, as Louisiana looks like the likely landfall spot.
Would that mean less time over water?
South Texas Storms wrote:With the Great Lakes trough trending stronger, chances for a TX landfall have decreased today. I'm feeling better here in Houston, as Louisiana looks like the likely landfall spot.
South Texas Storms wrote:With the Great Lakes trough trending stronger, chances for a TX landfall have decreased today. I'm feeling better here in Houston, as Louisiana looks like the likely landfall spot.
Kazmit wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:With the Great Lakes trough trending stronger, chances for a TX landfall have decreased today. I'm feeling better here in Houston, as Louisiana looks like the likely landfall spot.
Would that mean less time over water?
ColdMiser123 wrote:Kazmit wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:With the Great Lakes trough trending stronger, chances for a TX landfall have decreased today. I'm feeling better here in Houston, as Louisiana looks like the likely landfall spot.
Would that mean less time over water?
Probably by about 12 to 18 hours or so. A stronger trough will likely mean the system will stall for an extended period of time though, due to the conflicting steering flow.
South Texas Storms wrote:With the Great Lakes trough trending stronger, chances for a TX landfall have decreased today. I'm feeling better here in Houston, as Louisiana looks like the likely landfall spot.
Tireman4 wrote:Long way to go. Lots of flip flops in our future. Lets get this entity over water, then we can have a better handle on items....enjoy the ride.
artist wrote:Tireman4 wrote:Long way to go. Lots of flip flops in our future. Lets get this entity over water, then we can have a better handle on items....enjoy the ride.
Long way to go? Today is Tuesday. It could hit Sat, only 4 days.
stormlover2013 wrote:Lol man people jump the gun on models, yesterday had tx and now today la. We don’t have a center yet I think we will know for tomorrow morning what could happen. I wouldn’t be surprised one bit it’s more east or more west tonight or in the morning.
stormlover2013 wrote:Lol man people jump the gun on models, yesterday had tx and now today la. We don’t have a center yet I think we will know for tomorrow morning what could happen. I wouldn’t be surprised one bit it’s more east or more west tonight or in the morning.
StormLogic wrote:I just don't think the trough is deep enough on Friday to pull 92L or potential Barry northward into LA, that's why I'm still feeling like this could go as far west as Mcfaddin Beach, maybe even Anahuac, TX.
Steve wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:Lol man people jump the gun on models, yesterday had tx and now today la. We don’t have a center yet I think we will know for tomorrow morning what could happen. I wouldn’t be surprised one bit it’s more east or more west tonight or in the morning.
While certainly true, we didn't even have anything south of 35N, and many of the models as well as the NHC picked up on the weakness that will be found in the NE Gulf this evening. Once you get inside 96 hours, most of the time the models come into pretty decent agreement. That's not always the case, and I've seen one storm in the last few years where almost all tracks were on top of each other and it didn't verify. But that's the exception to the rule in the late 20-teens. I wouldn't completely write off the mid-TX coast and even less so the SETX coast at this point. But we're probably in a situation where the models will simply refine their solutions. So while I'd say everyone from WFL to the mid-TX Coast should be on guard, you have to think the yellow zone is somewhere between the MS/AL border and maybe Galveston with the redzone probably between the Mouth of the River and Vermilion Bay.
In any event, we won't have long to find out. So this isn't one of those 2 week NC vs. FL vs. Texas model wars on the horizon.
Steve wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:Lol man people jump the gun on models, yesterday had tx and now today la. We don’t have a center yet I think we will know for tomorrow morning what could happen. I wouldn’t be surprised one bit it’s more east or more west tonight or in the morning.
While certainly true, we didn't even have anything south of 35N, and many of the models as well as the NHC picked up on the weakness that will be found in the NE Gulf this evening. Once you get inside 96 hours, most of the time the models come into pretty decent agreement. That's not always the case, and I've seen one storm in the last few years where almost all tracks were on top of each other and it didn't verify. But that's the exception to the rule in the late 20-teens. I wouldn't completely write off the mid-TX coast and even less so the SETX coast at this point. But we're probably in a situation where the models will simply refine their solutions. So while I'd say everyone from WFL to the mid-TX Coast should be on guard, you have to think the yellow zone is somewhere between the MS/AL border and maybe Galveston with the redzone probably between the Mouth of the River and Vermilion Bay.
In any event, we won't have long to find out. So this isn't one of those 2 week NC vs. FL vs. Texas model wars on the horizon.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests