rdcrds wrote:If this doesn’t turn some people are going to lose their jobs, we have the all clear in Tampa
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Who issued an all clear?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
rdcrds wrote:If this doesn’t turn some people are going to lose their jobs, we have the all clear in Tampa
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
INIT 31/2100Z 26.2N 74.4W 130 KT 150 MPH
12H 01/0600Z 26.4N 75.7W 135 KT 155 MPH
Kazmit wrote:supercane4867 wrote:I think we should see a special advisory from the NHC anytime now
https://i.imgur.com/pacUIvF.gif
Next advisory is in an hour.
Blinhart wrote:ozonepete wrote:jdjaguar wrote:155 CAT 4 vs 156 CAT 5 is just nomenclature
156 mph is not Cat 5.
It used to be, they must of just changed it to 157. I don't know what the difference of 1 MPH makes.
rdcrds wrote:If this doesn’t turn some people are going to lose their jobs, we have the all clear in Tampa
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
StormPyrate wrote:rdcrds wrote:If this doesn’t turn some people are going to lose their jobs, we have the all clear in Tampa
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Who issued an all clear?
Blinhart wrote:ozonepete wrote:jdjaguar wrote:155 CAT 4 vs 156 CAT 5 is just nomenclature
156 mph is not Cat 5.
It used to be, they must of just changed it to 157. I don't know what the difference of 1 MPH makes.
jdjaguar wrote:ozonepete wrote:jdjaguar wrote:155 CAT 4 vs 156 CAT 5 is just nomenclature
156 mph is not Cat 5.
Let me rephrase
155 mph vs 157mph is just nomenclature.
rdcrds wrote:StormPyrate wrote:rdcrds wrote:If this doesn’t turn some people are going to lose their jobs, we have the all clear in Tampa
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Who issued an all clear?
Paul dellegatto
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
rdcrds wrote:StormPyrate wrote:rdcrds wrote:If this doesn’t turn some people are going to lose their jobs, we have the all clear in Tampa
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Who issued an all clear?
Paul dellegatto
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ozonepete wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:ozonepete wrote:
There are many other upper level readings from 500 to 200 mb that have to be taken into account, especially from the upper midwest where the trough is beginning to descend southeastward. For just one example, how strong is the trough and how far southeastward will it go? So it's not so much what the ridge is now over the southeast U.S. as much as how strong and which way oriented it will be in the next 3 days.
Yes but unfortunately the short term motion now will lead to long term problem later regardless of whats happening with the shortwave. That shortwave is not close enough to cause any effect on the environment around Dorian right now..
its currently south of all the 12/18z gfs guidance and still heading west. The recurve will happen.. just when is the issue. and its looking like there will be enough ridging to cause florida east coast some serious problems.
Agreed.![]()
Do you expect it to get within 50 miles of the Florida coast at some point?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests