ATL: HANNA - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11453
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1521 Postby GCANE » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:00 am

Major infeed as shown by the nearly off-scale rain rate in the feeder band.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1522 Postby drezee » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:03 am

drezee wrote:
Highteeld wrote:Air Force on the way

They did a test flight and landed.


30 minutes

TROPICAL STORM HANNA
FLIGHT ONE - TEAL 75
A. 25/1730Z
B. AFXXX 0708A HANNA
C. 25/1530Z
D. 27.4N 96.9W
E. 25/1700Z TO 25/2030Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1523 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:07 am

The discussions say 85 to 90 kts at 7000 to 8000 in low convection areas..

umm the northern eyewall at 5000 to 6000 Feet has been showing 110 + mph consistently now in heavy bands..
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 897
Age: 28
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1524 Postby ColdMiser123 » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:07 am

Highteeld wrote:
ColdMiser123 wrote:
Highteeld wrote:Should have another 4 more hours to intensify


Guidance has Hanna making landfall later at this point, 6z HMON didn't make landfall until after 0z. HWRF closer to 21z. If that is accurate then it should be closer to 6-10 more hours left over water. In a situation where pressure falls are significant, every hour will count.

I'm not confident it will intensify the last few hours though, lots of land interaction could occur and halt progress


Land friction in this case should tighten the circulation and reduce the RMW which in turn should bump up the winds quite a bit. I would not be surprised at all to see intensification to the moment of landfall.
4 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

Hurricane Mike
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1525 Postby Hurricane Mike » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:07 am

Landfall delayed to 10-12 hrs from now per NHC
2 likes   

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2139
Age: 41
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1526 Postby Highteeld » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:08 am

ColdMiser123 wrote:
Highteeld wrote:
ColdMiser123 wrote:
Guidance has Hanna making landfall later at this point, 6z HMON didn't make landfall until after 0z. HWRF closer to 21z. If that is accurate then it should be closer to 6-10 more hours left over water. In a situation where pressure falls are significant, every hour will count.

I'm not confident it will intensify the last few hours though, lots of land interaction could occur and halt progress


Land friction in this case should tighten the circulation and reduce the RMW which in turn should bump up the winds quite a bit. I would not be surprised at all to see intensification to the moment of landfall.

It would if dry air weren't such an issue like it is today. Harvey did very well with frictional convergence, but it was closed off better than hanna. we'll see
0 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf

User avatar
Cataegis96
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 54
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2017 3:46 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1527 Postby Cataegis96 » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:09 am

Hurricane Mike wrote:Landfall delayed to 10-12 hrs from now per NHC


Was just going to mention this. Not good.
1 likes   
Lead Meteorologist Mars, Inc
WE ARE! The Pennsylvania State University 2018
UA U KNOW! University at Albany, SUNY 2020

shiny-pebble
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 299
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2018 1:38 pm

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1528 Postby shiny-pebble » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:11 am

Looks like a ragged eye is clearing out on visible

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
0 likes   
Not an meteorologist! Just someone who is interested in weather. Please refer to the NHC and local weather officials to make decisions.
-Jack 8-)

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11453
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1529 Postby GCANE » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:12 am

Some how I am just not understanding the dry-air / shear commentaries.
Big towers are still obscuring most part of the eye.

Image

Image
2 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1530 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:12 am

Cataegis96 wrote:
Hurricane Mike wrote:Landfall delayed to 10-12 hrs from now per NHC


Was just going to mention this. Not good.


especially if the eye contracts down to 10 to 15 miles that will keep the potential of this reaching 100 mph in the high chance.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1531 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:13 am

GCANE wrote:Some how I am just not understanding the dry-air / shear commentaries.
Big towers are still obscuring most part of the eye.

https://i.imgur.com/I3ZuQ7V.gif

https://i.imgur.com/YWfawue.png


That is because people think that every void is a dry air..

which its not.
4 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1532 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:14 am

Looks like the western part of the storm is becoming a bit ragged on IR. Likely some interaction with dry air over Texas, which seems to have been one of its limiting factors. Great that it did not have a perfect environment up to landfall. However, not good that landfall has been delayed by 10-12 hours. Hopefully, it intensifies slowly. :eek:
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8812
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1533 Postby aspen » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:15 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
Cataegis96 wrote:
Hurricane Mike wrote:Landfall delayed to 10-12 hrs from now per NHC


Was just going to mention this. Not good.


especially if the eye contracts down to 10 to 15 miles that will keep the potential of this reaching 100 mph in the high chance.

Why would the eye contract that much in this short of a time span? It’s currently around 30 miles across, and I don’t see it changing size much this close to landfall.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1534 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:16 am

aspen wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
Cataegis96 wrote:
Was just going to mention this. Not good.


especially if the eye contracts down to 10 to 15 miles that will keep the potential of this reaching 100 mph in the high chance.

Why would the eye contract that much in this short of a time span? It’s currently around 30 miles across, and I don’t see it changing size much this close to landfall.


Land friction..

it has already contracted looking at long radar loops.
2 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1535 Postby stormlover2013 » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:16 am

hurricaneCW wrote:If she had another day then it would've been a major at landfall maybe a cat 4.

Folks in SE TX lucked out.


Upper Texas coast will has plenty of time this year!! Many opportunities arise.
0 likes   

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2139
Age: 41
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1536 Postby Highteeld » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:18 am

Yeah, I think the eye has shrunk a bit over the last 3 or 4 hours based off radar as well, maybe 6-7 miles or so.
3 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf

User avatar
GrayLancer18
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 2:45 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1537 Postby GrayLancer18 » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:18 am

 https://twitter.com/philklotzbach/status/1287042466680467457




If the rate is 35mph in a 24-hour period and if the NHC says there's still 10-12 hours, Hanna could peak at 90mph before landfall.
1 likes   
Hugo (1989) Hortense (1996) Georges (1998) Jeanne (2004) Irene (2011) Maria (2017)

I am NOT a professional meteorologist nor weather professional. Opinions are my own.
Consult with NHC and NOAA for official forecasts and advisories.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11453
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1538 Postby GCANE » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:20 am

Strong 1 hr hail swaths in the feeder band

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2139
Age: 41
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1539 Postby Highteeld » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:21 am

1 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11453
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: HANNA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1540 Postby GCANE » Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:21 am

0 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests