ATL: ISAIAS - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
CM2
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 2:41 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#241 Postby CM2 » Mon Jul 27, 2020 2:49 am

TheProfessor wrote:I must say, if this thing ever reaches its full potential and gets some of the good venting that Hanna got with more time over water, it's going to be a monster. :eek:

Yeah and what would be even more dangerous is if the high pressure ridge actually holds and it keeps together somewhat and managed to get into the gulf as a cat1/TS. Though looking at the HWRF, you can REALLY see the dry air is gonna get sucked right up into the storm.

Even more so it looks as if the gulf has quite a bit of dry air in it too which would hurt it even more. It seems the best place for rapid intensification would be right in that little area between Jacksonville and the Outer Banks. Water is real hot there and the air is kind of moist. If it ever reaches full potential, it wouldn't be in the gulf, it would be off the coast of SC. Even the GFS-Para has this storm rapidly intensifying from TS to Cat 2-3 in the span of 48 hours.


After writing this the GFS-Para just got it's 00z run in and it just pulled a real interesting solution. Now we have the potential of it coming in with more time spent over the open atlantic and a slow approach to land. I know this probabaly is getting close to belonging to the 92L model thread but I am mainly just using the models to illustrate my points.
1 likes   
Large Signatures are for losers.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
HurricaneAndre2008
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 334
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 9:51 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#242 Postby HurricaneAndre2008 » Mon Jul 27, 2020 3:27 am

A TCFA issued for 92L.
Image
3 likes   
Cindy(2005), Katrina(2005), Rita(2005), Erin(2007), Isaac(2012)

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#243 Postby GCANE » Mon Jul 27, 2020 4:03 am

An interesting feature that GFS is showing is the development of a surface low over SC at 168 hrs.
Could cause it to make a left turn / wobble.
If this happens and the interaction effect, depends on many variables, foremost of which is how 92L's track evolves.
Just noting this now as something to consider and watch for down the road.

Image
1 likes   

arkestra
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:24 pm
Location: The Old Continent

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#244 Postby arkestra » Mon Jul 27, 2020 4:06 am

That’s already a long thread for... an invest.


Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
3 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#245 Postby toad strangler » Mon Jul 27, 2020 4:08 am

Hammy wrote:
toad strangler wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:92L has a tough road ahead.

https://twitter.com/andyhazelton/status/1287565348359884805


huh, The National Hurricane Center says the opposite


Lets wait until it's upgraded to make any claims about what they're saying about future intensity as the discussion focuses only on development chances--and it shouldn't be a very long wait given the satellite appearance.


I never made a claim about intensity. Please don’t put words in my mouth. My comment and context were in regards to development per NHC words. As you even follow up with in the very next sentence. :lol:
1 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#246 Postby Hammy » Mon Jul 27, 2020 4:15 am

CM2 wrote:
TheProfessor wrote:I must say, if this thing ever reaches its full potential and gets some of the good venting that Hanna got with more time over water, it's going to be a monster. :eek:

Yeah and what would be even more dangerous is if the high pressure ridge actually holds and it keeps together somewhat and managed to get into the gulf as a cat1/TS. Though looking at the HWRF, you can REALLY see the dry air is gonna get sucked right up into the storm.
https://imgur.com/CxAfYlQ
Even more so it looks as if the gulf has quite a bit of dry air in it too which would hurt it even more. It seems the best place for rapid intensification would be right in that little area between Jacksonville and the Outer Banks. Water is real hot there and the air is kind of moist. If it ever reaches full potential, it wouldn't be in the gulf, it would be off the coast of SC. Even the GFS-Para has this storm rapidly intensifying from TS to Cat 2-3 in the span of 48 hours.
https://imgur.com/JP0qnXU

After writing this the GFS-Para just got it's 00z run in and it just pulled a real interesting solution. Now we have the potential of it coming in with more time spent over the open atlantic and a slow approach to land. I know this probabaly is getting close to belonging to the 92L model thread but I am mainly just using the models to illustrate my points.


I swear for a second I thought somebody accidentally linked one of the Florence forecasts from 2018. Seems like there's a split between weak and strong (with not a whole lot between) and none of the latter are ending well for the coast.
3 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#247 Postby GCANE » Mon Jul 27, 2020 4:19 am

Large high-TPW air infeed all the way from the Amazon River.

Image
7 likes   

User avatar
CM2
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 2:41 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#248 Postby CM2 » Mon Jul 27, 2020 4:23 am

Hammy wrote:I swear for a second I thought somebody accidentally linked one of the Florence forecasts from 2018. Seems like there's a split between weak and strong (with not a whole lot between) and none of the latter are ending well for the coast.

If the ridge is strong and the storm goes through the Caribbean or skims just North through the gulf, the storm does not have a good chance to survive. There is so much dry air in the area and any storm that wanders in there will not have a good time. Think of what happened to Gonzalo. A weaker ridge is going to put the storm away from the Caribbean and into more favorable waters for development off the coast of the Carolinas, northeastern Florida. If the storm is going to develop, the only real place it can go is there.
1 likes   
Large Signatures are for losers.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#249 Postby GCANE » Mon Jul 27, 2020 4:32 am

GFS is forecasting this to be under an Anticyclonic Rossby Wave Break once it gets north of Hispaniola.
If this holds, intensity could be more than currently anticipated.

Image
3 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#250 Postby GCANE » Mon Jul 27, 2020 4:36 am

Last ASCAT pass

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneEnzo
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 739
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:18 pm
Location: Newport, NC (Hurricane Alley)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#251 Postby HurricaneEnzo » Mon Jul 27, 2020 5:15 am

Idk just me personally but I don't see anything forming from this. It is just massive and devoid of convection. Its got some serious work to do.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Last edited by HurricaneEnzo on Mon Jul 27, 2020 8:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
Bertha 96' - Fran 96' - Bonnie 98' - Dennis 99' - Floyd 99' - Isabel 03' - Alex 04' - Ophelia 05' - Irene 11' - Arthur 14' - Matthew 16' - Florence 18' - Dorian 19' - Isaias 20' (countless other tropical storms and Hurricane swipes)

I am not a Professional Met just an enthusiast. Get your weather forecasts from the Pros!

User avatar
ouragans
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 490
Age: 53
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:09 pm
Location: Abymes, Guadeloupe F.W.I
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#252 Postby ouragans » Mon Jul 27, 2020 5:50 am

Finally...

Location: 12.0°N 42.2°W
Maximum Winds: 25 kt Gusts: nan kt
Minimum Central Pressure: 1009 mb
Environmental Pressure: 1011 mb
Radius of Circulation: 180 NM
Radius of Maximum Wind: 150 NM
4 likes   
Personal forecast disclaimer
This post is a personal point of view, not an information. Please refer to official statements for life-threatening decisions.

David '79, Frederic '79, Hugo '89, Iris, Luis & Marilyn '95, Georges '98, Lenny '99, Dean '07, Irma '17, Maria '17, Fiona '22, Philippe '23, Tammy '23
16°13'33.3,"6N -61°36'39.5"W

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#253 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:07 am

You can pretty much toss the all previous runs of the GFS and Euro out the door..

This mornings Visible does appear that something is trying to consolidate well to the south around 10 to 11 North.. GFS is like 15 N Euro is also 12 to 15 N for initialization of vorticity.

and it is also farther west
6 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#254 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:23 am

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
ouragans
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 490
Age: 53
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:09 pm
Location: Abymes, Guadeloupe F.W.I
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#255 Postby ouragans » Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:24 am

Aric Dunn wrote:You can pretty much toss the all previous runs of the GFS and Euro out the door..

This mornings Visible does appear that something is trying to consolidate well to the south around 10 to 11 North.. GFS is like 15 N Euro is also 12 to 15 N for initialization of vorticity.

and it is also farther west

6z best track is still with the circ by 12N while there is something by 10.8N. That would mean all models with the northern circ are actually wrong. They all show a system passing just north of the islands. Euro ensemble shows a direct hit between Martinique and Antigua, since at least 4 days
4 likes   
Personal forecast disclaimer
This post is a personal point of view, not an information. Please refer to official statements for life-threatening decisions.

David '79, Frederic '79, Hugo '89, Iris, Luis & Marilyn '95, Georges '98, Lenny '99, Dean '07, Irma '17, Maria '17, Fiona '22, Philippe '23, Tammy '23
16°13'33.3,"6N -61°36'39.5"W

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#256 Postby SFLcane » Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:31 am

Less organized... just maybe euro is up to something.


1. Shower activity associated with a broad area of low pressure located a little more than 1000 miles east of the Windward Islands has become a little less organized since last night. However, environmental conditions are still expected to become more favorable for development in a day or two and a tropical depression or tropical storm will likely form within the next couple of days. The
system is forecast to move westward to west northwestward at 15 to 20 mph and could begin to affect portions of the Lesser Antilles on Wednesday or Wednesday night. Interests on those islands should
continue to monitor the progress of this system.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...high...80 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...high...90 percent.
3 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#257 Postby SFLcane » Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:34 am

They aren’t even running models right now I don’t see the 06z guidance being sent out.
3 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#258 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:36 am

SFLcane wrote:Less organized... just maybe euro is up to something.


1. Shower activity associated with a broad area of low pressure located a little more than 1000 miles east of the Windward Islands has become a little less organized since last night. However, environmental conditions are still expected to become more favorable for development in a day or two and a tropical depression or tropical storm will likely form within the next couple of days. The
system is forecast to move westward to west northwestward at 15 to 20 mph and could begin to affect portions of the Lesser Antilles on Wednesday or Wednesday night. Interests on those islands should
continue to monitor the progress of this system.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...high...80 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...high...90 percent.


Though some of the convection that started to develop last night has weakened..

I disagree it has become less organized..

for the first time we have a fairly well defined circ developing between the two blobs. Let see if convection start to fire with it.

Morning visible making it quite clear.

Image
2 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#259 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:37 am

This invest looks far from impressive at this moment. Almost like a big cyclonic gyre out in the middle of the Atlantic surrounded by SAL to the north. If it wasn't for a weak Kelvin wave passing by right now, I would put the genesis chances much lower than the NHC has them right now. Anyway, I am leaning toward the Euro solution at this point in time. If 92L is to undergo genesis within the next two days, it desperately needs some sustained convection to create a local vorticity maximum. Too broad for now.
5 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#260 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:42 am

SouthDadeFish wrote:This invest looks far from impressive at this moment. Almost like a big cyclonic gyre out in the middle of the Atlantic surrounded by SAL to the north. If it wasn't for a weak Kelvin wave passing by right now, I would put the genesis chances much lower than the NHC has them right now. Anyway, I am leaning toward the Euro solution at this point in time. If 92L is to undergo genesis within the next two days, it desperately needs some sustained convection to create a local vorticity maximum. Too broad for now.


how about a centralized vort max ? :)

Image
3 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests