toad strangler wrote:Steve wrote:aspen wrote:I’ve been expecting 2020 to behave a bit like 2017 (and, to a lesser extent, 2018) where the peak of activity lasted from the end of August through the first half of October. That’s 3-4 storms in August, 5-7 in September, and 2-3 in October. However, if the Atlantic is going to be prime for development even until November, then this October could be one of the most active on record...
I don't have much of an opinion on this yet, but I'm paying attention. I've read and heard a few different people's opinions on how they think timing of the peak(s) of the season might go. I'd bet it's not going to go nonstop through November.
There are always breaks in a season because of all the major atmospheric changes that happen from August to November (all types, levels and from all directions). Patterns intensify and relax. MJO and Kelvin Waves come by. Fronts come down often with splitting troughs in La Nina so you need a few days to clear those patterns and have a weakness, etc.. I think I read someone suggest 3 weeks or so of activity, a break of a week or two and then another burst. Bastardi suggested that we might have a 6ish week period of intense activity and the not much after that. Others have said they think September and October will be busy.
?
Noll's statement was "risks into November". Pretty sure nobody would read this as nonstop action, but rather a general favorable background state that will be anomalous to a peak centered burst and done regime.
I was talking about timing of the season and not so much whether or not the season could still be producing storms in November or December. I'm sure there are parts of the basin that can and might support that. What I was referring to is more that there isn't likely to be like a 90 day marathon of storms. So what happens on timing and how does the timing play out? I don't trust longer range models that much and tend to trust pattern evolution more. So I'm curious about that aspect of how the season plays out.