ATL: MARCO - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143863
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#61 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 16, 2020 7:21 pm

00z Best Track:

97L INVEST 200817 0000 12.4N 52.4W ATL 25 1009

At 0000 UTC, 17 August 2020, DISTURBANCE INVEST 97 (AL97) was located in the North Atlantic basin at 12.4°N and 52.4°W. The current intensity was 25 kt and the center was moving at 18 kt at a bearing of 275 degrees. The minimum central pressure was 1009 mb.
2 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Cpv17
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4915
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:24 pm
Location: Wharton/El Campo, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#62 Postby Cpv17 » Sun Aug 16, 2020 7:21 pm

psyclone wrote:
ronjon wrote:
psyclone wrote:I think you guys are onto something wrt future track. A straight climo bet is west. But we've had some troughy conditions this season that make such a solution more iffy than usual. it is exactly why i suggested a couple days back to take no comfort in troughiness along with a more favorable Caribbean. Early instinct still leans west but more uncertainty than would otherwise be the case..


Pretty substantial positively-tilted long wave trough at 500 mb forecasted by the GFS down to the northern GOM forecast the next 5-9 days. I know its a week out and things change, but that trough completely erodes the Atlantic ridges western half over the western and central GOM. Almost looks like a Charley-like trough. If this verifies, the western Caribbean storm would move north or N-NE from the Yuc straits.

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs&region=watl&pkg=z500aNorm&runtime=2020081618&fh=6


The risk of a more easterly solution is likely destined to be higher than one would expect based upon calendar alone. I have been watching WPC's 7 day QPF output with interest. It's juicy in our neck of the woods. To be fair, a more westerly solution would be beyond 7 days so those folks are not out of the hunt by any stretch, it's just more like 8-10 days. Needless to say, watching the evolution of this and other guidance over the next few days will help provide some clarity.


Even if this develops and doesn’t directly hit Florida, FL will probably get a lot of rain from it.
0 likes   

TallyTracker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 719
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#63 Postby TallyTracker » Sun Aug 16, 2020 7:24 pm

This one has my attention! Just checked my water and non perishable stores just too make sure I’m good. The Publix in my neighborhood here in Tally is still running short of most non-perishable canned goods and bottled water. I’m very concerned about supplies should 97L or later systems pose a major threat to our region.
0 likes   
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#64 Postby stormlover2013 » Sun Aug 16, 2020 7:52 pm

TallyTracker wrote:This one has my attention! Just checked my water and non perishable stores just too make sure I’m good. The Publix in my neighborhood here in Tally is still running short of most non-perishable canned goods and bottled water. I’m very concerned about supplies should 97L or later systems pose a major threat to our region.



I don’t see this being a panhandle storm
0 likes   

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 619
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#65 Postby mpic » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:15 pm

Is this official...97L? The NOAA facebook page was still calling it a wave an hour ago? Did I miss something?
0 likes   
Alicia, Rita, Ike, Harvey and Beryl...moved to Splendora lol

SconnieCane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 997
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#66 Postby SconnieCane » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:22 pm

mpic wrote:Is this official...97L? The NOAA facebook page was still calling it a wave an hour ago? Did I miss something?


It *is* a wave.
5 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#67 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:26 pm

This one looks like trouble potentially to me. Between its fast forward motion and the typical East Caribbean hostilities, development isn't likely in the short term. By the time it reaches Jamaica's longitude, though, it should slow down substantially while being positioned underneath a broad upper-level anticyclone. Operational models have struggled with genesis this year, most notably with Hanna. This may be another case where models need to quickly adjust upward with intensity.
4 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#68 Postby gatorcane » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:27 pm

Looks to be getting hit with mid-level shear. Still appears once this wave reaches the Central-West Caribbean and slows down, gradual development is possible. A weaker more shallow system moves west into Central America / Yucatan but a deeper more intense system would slow down a bit more and move more poleward. Guidance still remains on the weak side but given the time of year and where it is headed, it is possible guidance is too weak.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9591
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#69 Postby Steve » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:31 pm

TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:This one looks like trouble potentially to me. Between its fast forward motion and the typical East Caribbean hostilities, development isn't likely in the short term. By the time it reaches Jamaica's longitude, though, it should slow down substantially while being positioned underneath a broad upper-level anticyclone. Operational models have struggled with genesis this year, most notably with Hanna. This may be another case where models need to quickly adjust upward with intensity.


Could be one of those cases. I think it’s really hard to say yet, but that’s just me. Ceiling for the trailing wave looks a lot higher. But if this was able to move to the western Gulf or at least slow enough coming up otherwise, you could see a moderate hurricane coming out of this one.
0 likes   

User avatar
DestinHurricane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 8:05 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#70 Postby DestinHurricane » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:33 pm

Don't call anything off anything with low shear and warm water in the GOM!
1 likes   
Michael 2018

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8812
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#71 Postby aspen » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:38 pm

DestinHurricane wrote:Don't call anything off anything with low shear and warm water in the GOM!

Warm is an understatement. They’re so hot that over half of the Gulf is marked as being able to support an <890 mbar system on the latest Maximum Potential Intensity maps. If anything gets in there with enough time and a favorable environment, it is going to explode. A quicker system through the Gulf would limit its potential, but with peak season arriving and two AEWs on there was westward with the chance of getting into the Gulf, I have a feeling we’ll see a major in there before the end of August.
5 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9591
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#72 Postby Steve » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:40 pm

DestinHurricane wrote:Don't call anything off anything with low shear and warm water in the GOM!


I wouldn’t do that in this type of case and this far out. Ceiling could go way up. But the reasonable assumption this far out would be at least a strong ts to moderate hurricane looks like a safe betting range. Most experts think we will get 9-12 hurricanes. We only had 2 I think so far. So you already know.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#73 Postby gatorcane » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:40 pm

I think Earl 2016 was the last good example of what could happen. That hurricane formed from a wave moving west across the Caribbean. Once it got to the Western Caribbean, it really took off. I recall models were also not too bullish initially except I think the Euro picked up on a possible hurricane first. The difference is that this invest could turn more north if it becomes a hurricane instead of crashing into Central America,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Earl_(2016)
1 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#74 Postby sma10 » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:45 pm

aspen wrote:
DestinHurricane wrote:Don't call anything off anything with low shear and warm water in the GOM!

Warm is an understatement. They’re so hot that over half of the Gulf is marked as being able to support an <890 mbar system on the latest Maximum Potential Intensity maps. If anything gets in there with enough time and a favorable environment, it is going to explode. A quicker system through the Gulf would limit its potential, but with peak season arriving and two AEWs on there was westward with the chance of getting into the Gulf, I have a feeling we’ll see a major in there before the end of August.


Furthermore, please don't take Global Models intensity verbatim. The NHC relies very much of course on the globals tracking prowess, but often mentions that the margin of error on intensity is great. For example, if you see a global 7 day forecast showing a 982mb low in the Gulf the only thing you can discern is that conditions are likely favorable, but actual intensity could be significantly greater
2 likes   

User avatar
DestinHurricane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 8:05 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#75 Postby DestinHurricane » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:50 pm

aspen wrote:
DestinHurricane wrote:Don't call anything off anything with low shear and warm water in the GOM!

Warm is an understatement. They’re so hot that over half of the Gulf is marked as being able to support an <890 mbar system on the latest Maximum Potential Intensity maps. If anything gets in there with enough time and a favorable environment, it is going to explode. A quicker system through the Gulf would limit its potential, but with peak season arriving and two AEWs on there was westward with the chance of getting into the Gulf, I have a feeling we’ll see a major in there before the end of August.


Exactly. If anything gets in there right now and shear is low, a major hurricane is rather likely if it has time.
0 likes   
Michael 2018

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9591
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#76 Postby Steve » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:52 pm

What percent would you put as rather likely?
0 likes   

User avatar
DestinHurricane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 8:05 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#77 Postby DestinHurricane » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:53 pm

Steve wrote:What percent would you put as rather likely?


60-70% but that is IF the conditions are right.
0 likes   
Michael 2018

User avatar
Cpv17
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4915
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:24 pm
Location: Wharton/El Campo, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#78 Postby Cpv17 » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:54 pm

Can anyone tell me how you view the sst’s on TT?
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4229
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#79 Postby abajan » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:55 pm

AnnularCane wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:If this becomes the L storm, what would be the name?



Laura.

Pronounced LOOR-ruh.
Yep. Here we go again. :lol:
1 likes   

shiny-pebble
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 299
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2018 1:38 pm

Re: RE: Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#80 Postby shiny-pebble » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:55 pm

Cpv17 wrote:Can anyone tell me how you view the sst’s on TT?
Go to the analysis tools tab and click ocean analysis

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
2 likes   
Not an meteorologist! Just someone who is interested in weather. Please refer to the NHC and local weather officials to make decisions.
-Jack 8-)


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests