Ken711 wrote:AerospaceEng wrote:supercane4867 wrote:12z euro @24hr is SW than yesterday's 12z run at the same timeframe.
And stronger...
Looks weaker.
You’re right, I was accidentally comparing with yesterday’s 12z.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Ken711 wrote:AerospaceEng wrote:supercane4867 wrote:12z euro @24hr is SW than yesterday's 12z run at the same timeframe.
And stronger...
Looks weaker.
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Let's let the run finish.
Down to 975mb and rapidly deepening by hour 54. Actually slightly stronger than the 00z at landfall.
https://i.imgur.com/6yiUOnk.png
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Let's let the run finish.
Down to 975mb and rapidly deepening by hour 54. Actually slightly stronger than the 00z at landfall.
https://i.imgur.com/6yiUOnk.png
For comparison, 00z ECMWF was ~972 mb at landfall. 12z is 962mb, very slightly more west.
PTrackerLA wrote:Every 12z model is east of the TX/LA border, time to kick my prep into high gear here in Lafayette.
HouTXmetro wrote:Well we FINALLY have consensus. Had these models been in agreement like this earlier this morning I would have saved time and money wasted trying to prepare. Oh well, it comes with the territory. Thoughts and prayers to those in the storms path.
Stormcenter wrote:IMO everyone from SE TX to SE LA is still in
play.
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Let's let the run finish.
Down to 975mb and rapidly deepening by hour 54. Actually slightly stronger than the 00z at landfall.
https://i.imgur.com/6yiUOnk.png
For comparison, 00z ECMWF was ~972 mb at landfall. 12z is 962mb, very slightly more west.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests