supercane4867 wrote:11PM advisory bumped peak intensity to 105kt
Still conservative, IMO.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
supercane4867 wrote:11PM advisory bumped peak intensity to 105kt
supercane4867 wrote:11PM advisory bumped peak intensity to 105kt
MarioProtVI wrote:According to the discussion they upped to 80 kt because they’re getting data from an AF flight that for some reason is not transmitting publicly.
HurricaneEdouard wrote:supercane4867 wrote:11PM advisory bumped peak intensity to 105kt
Still conservative, IMO.
MarioProtVI wrote:According to the discussion they upped to 80 kt because they’re getting data from an AF flight that for some reason is not transmitting publicly.
eastcoastFL wrote:Steve wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:Maybe some shear before landfall?
https://twitter.com/derekortt/status/1298414130404171779
It’s along the TX coastline. I don’t see any impacts until possibly the very end of the over water track.
And by then I think its forecast to start pulling away as she's coming in. I guess it's all about timing
KC7NEC wrote:Im very concerned the refineries at Port Arthur will be the major story after this storm.
Steve wrote:eastcoastFL wrote:Steve wrote:
It’s along the TX coastline. I don’t see any impacts until possibly the very end of the over water track.
And by then I think its forecast to start pulling away as she's coming in. I guess it's all about timing
It was supposed to back up enough for Marco to get going too. It was a little more pesky though. It left a piece back that was spinning and split back but the trough kind of only slowly migrated west and held Marco at bay and even sheared the top off and continues to do so even now. Marco partially went under the eastern edge of the high clouds moving NE alone the trough edge as you could see at the end of daylight visible. But he was pulling SW to S at that point and is at a much lower steering level than the east side flow. You know the sw flow was strong with the storm and firing 100-200 miles to the northeast this afternoon. We only have a day and 3 hours until landfall. And with the east edge of the trough adjacent and even part of the boundary of the anticyclone over Laura, how much can it pull back now? I don’t know. I’m not trying to make or refute the argument either way. I’m just observing. Lots of lightning with that first outer band to our south. Many many strikes.
Blinhart wrote:ConvergenceZone wrote:FixySLN wrote:Forsee gradual eastern shifts in the forecast due to future sheer, shape, and intensity.
Friendly reminder than I'm NOT a pro met and my OPINION should NOT be taken as gospel. Please follow the instruction of your local government.
I don't know if this is truly the case though. I haven't heard it mentioned once on the weather channel that if the storm intensified significantly then the track will go more east. I mean that's pretty big, so I think that would be mentioned if that were the case.......
No because they want to make sure Houston is prepared just in case it doesn't end up at the state line or East of there. They don't want to look bad. All the latest models I have seen has shown a slight East shift.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests