This is a high school kid. Not that there is anything wrong with that

Moderator: S2k Moderators
cheezyWXguy wrote:Steve wrote:cheezyWXguy wrote:That was me, haha, or at least I was one of them. In my opinion, if the message he is trying to convey was related to ace as well as impacts, he should be outlining ocean areas as well as coastal areas and say, “these are the areas where I expect >50% of total ace to occur.” It would make much more of a statement to highlight the northern Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and east of Florida with risk areas while excluding the rest of the Atlantic, since it would be a more definitive deviation from climatology and more specific to this season.
I think that's what it says? He says (> 50% of total activity). I guess that's technically ambiguous and /= "ACE" necessarily. So I see that point now. https://www.weatherbell.com/may-2020-hu ... son-update
Oof. That’s what I get for making a claim without going back and checking the diagram first. I retract my statement. My false memory was that only the areas in red were highlighted at all. I would update my criticism to say he’s still quite generous with the red, but it’s not as bad as I remember.
blp wrote:Nothing is going to form in MDR with this thing. It will only push everything west. Not good. I don't buy the models with quick development. Plus it will squeeze the Bermuda ridge and pump it up.
https://twitter.com/pppapin/status/1300572652453736448?s=20
Hammy wrote:blp wrote:Nothing is going to form in MDR with this thing. It will only push everything west. Not good. I don't buy the models with quick development. Plus it will squeeze the Bermuda ridge and pump it up.
https://twitter.com/pppapin/status/1300572652453736448?s=20
That looks completely opposite the favorable conditions we were supposed to expect for September. Makes me wonder if we see a front-loaded season similar to 1990 followed by things picking back up again in October, or something like 2000 where the peak is delayed.
Hammy wrote:blp wrote:Nothing is going to form in MDR with this thing. It will only push everything west. Not good. I don't buy the models with quick development. Plus it will squeeze the Bermuda ridge and pump it up.
https://twitter.com/pppapin/status/1300572652453736448?s=20
That looks completely opposite the favorable conditions we were supposed to expect for September. Makes me wonder if we see a front-loaded season similar to 1990 followed by things picking back up again in October, or something like 2000 where the peak is delayed.
TheStormExpert wrote:Hammy wrote:blp wrote:Nothing is going to form in MDR with this thing. It will only push everything west. Not good. I don't buy the models with quick development. Plus it will squeeze the Bermuda ridge and pump it up.
https://twitter.com/pppapin/status/1300572652453736448?s=20
That looks completely opposite the favorable conditions we were supposed to expect for September. Makes me wonder if we see a front-loaded season similar to 1990 followed by things picking back up again in October, or something like 2000 where the peak is delayed.
What a HUGE bust that would if so. Can’t believe two recurving typhoons can have HUGE implications on the Atlantic in this way.
blp wrote:Nothing is going to form in MDR with this thing. It will only push everything west. Not good. I don't buy the models with quick development. Plus it will squeeze the Bermuda ridge and pump it up.
https://twitter.com/pppapin/status/1300572652453736448?s=20
MarioProtVI wrote:blp wrote:Nothing is going to form in MDR with this thing. It will only push everything west. Not good. I don't buy the models with quick development. Plus it will squeeze the Bermuda ridge and pump it up.
https://twitter.com/pppapin/status/1300572652453736448?s=20
Actually for what it’s worth the GFS (on the latest run) shows the strong shear from that TUTT just clipping the northern part of the MDR while pretty much killing the subtropics, but leaving the rest of it okay albeit a bit semi-light to fairly moderate shear (~10-15 maybe 20 kt max). If anything forms in the MDR it’ll have stay stay at like ~15–17N as that’s where shear is lower and to not get completely blasted by the shear during that time, and given the strong ridge this could happen. The massive TUTT seems to clear up by mid-September. This is why I would not write off CV season yet and already proclaiming September will be dead or inactive.
TheStormExpert wrote:MarioProtVI wrote:blp wrote:Nothing is going to form in MDR with this thing. It will only push everything west. Not good. I don't buy the models with quick development. Plus it will squeeze the Bermuda ridge and pump it up.
https://twitter.com/pppapin/status/1300572652453736448?s=20
Actually for what it’s worth the GFS (on the latest run) shows the strong shear from that TUTT just clipping the northern part of the MDR while pretty much killing the subtropics, but leaving the rest of it okay albeit a bit semi-light to fairly moderate shear (~10-15 maybe 20 kt max). If anything forms in the MDR it’ll have stay stay at like ~15–17N as that’s where shear is lower and to not get completely blasted by the shear during that time, and given the strong ridge this could happen. The massive TUTT seems to clear up by mid-September. This is why I would not write off CV season yet and already proclaiming September will be dead or inactive.
Cape Verde season wraps up in late-September though. May be too late to produce any long-tracking storms.
gatorcane wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:How is this indicator for you.. lol
euro..
40s and 50 into the gulf of mexico in earlt September. lol
rigghttt..
lol season canceled now right ?
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/ecmwf/2020083112/ecmwf_T850_eus_11.png
Surprisingly the GFS isn’t much different. Recurving typhoons to blame?
https://i.postimg.cc/9MBfqf27/gfs-T850-eus-41.png
NDG wrote:gatorcane wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:How is this indicator for you.. lol
euro..
40s and 50 into the gulf of mexico in earlt September. lol
rigghttt..
lol season canceled now right ?
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/ecmwf/2020083112/ecmwf_T850_eus_11.png
Surprisingly the GFS isn’t much different. Recurving typhoons to blame?
https://i.postimg.cc/9MBfqf27/gfs-T850-eus-41.png
Like I have said, we can have all the troughs come down the plains into the MS river valley, but if they don't keep progressing east the Atlantic/Bermuda ridge will still hold strong and the threat to the US will continue like it happened last week with Laura.
I would feel safer with a pattern of a big ridge over the southern plains/MS river valley and a huge trough either in the NE US or east of the US Coast.
https://i.imgur.com/ySksaNF.gif
Aric Dunn wrote:NDG wrote:gatorcane wrote:
Surprisingly the GFS isn’t much different. Recurving typhoons to blame?
https://i.postimg.cc/9MBfqf27/gfs-T850-eus-41.png
Like I have said, we can have all the troughs come down the plains into the MS river valley, but if they don't keep progressing east the Atlantic/Bermuda ridge will still hold strong and the threat to the US will continue like it happened last week with Laura.
I would feel safer with a pattern of a big ridge over the southern plains/MS river valley and a huge trough either in the NE US or east of the US Coast.
https://i.imgur.com/ySksaNF.gif
I was not worried about the ridge over the western atlantic..
it was the 40 and 50s in the western gulf...
SSTs would take a hit..
that and it being early September.
even the Charlie trough could not bring those types of temps with it.
NDG wrote:gatorcane wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:How is this indicator for you.. lol
euro..
40s and 50 into the gulf of mexico in earlt September. lol
rigghttt..
lol season canceled now right ?
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/ecmwf/2020083112/ecmwf_T850_eus_11.png
Surprisingly the GFS isn’t much different. Recurving typhoons to blame?
https://i.postimg.cc/9MBfqf27/gfs-T850-eus-41.png
Like I have said, we can have all the troughs come down the plains into the MS river valley, but if they don't keep progressing east the Atlantic/Bermuda ridge will still hold strong and the threat to the US will continue like it happened last week with Laura.
I would feel safer with a pattern of a big ridge over the southern plains/MS river valley and a huge trough either in the NE US or east of the US Coast.
https://i.imgur.com/ySksaNF.gif
SFLcane wrote:NDG wrote:gatorcane wrote:
Surprisingly the GFS isn’t much different. Recurving typhoons to blame?
https://i.postimg.cc/9MBfqf27/gfs-T850-eus-41.png
Like I have said, we can have all the troughs come down the plains into the MS river valley, but if they don't keep progressing east the Atlantic/Bermuda ridge will still hold strong and the threat to the US will continue like it happened last week with Laura.
I would feel safer with a pattern of a big ridge over the southern plains/MS river valley and a huge trough either in the NE US or east of the US Coast.
https://i.imgur.com/ySksaNF.gif
Only thing is there's a lot of weakness under that ridge. Which is why I think you see things heading Northwest instead of due west on the ensembles.
toad strangler wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:Hammy wrote:
That looks completely opposite the favorable conditions we were supposed to expect for September. Makes me wonder if we see a front-loaded season similar to 1990 followed by things picking back up again in October, or something like 2000 where the peak is delayed.
What a HUGE bust that would if so. Can’t believe two recurving typhoons can have HUGE implications on the Atlantic in this way.
Yep, there have never been re-curving W PAC typhoons before. THis is all so new.
Users browsing this forum: cajungal, Google Adsense [Bot], HurricaneBelle, KeysRedWine, Steve H. and 48 guests