PTPatrick wrote:Icon actually a slight shift west, was Pensacola but looking more Baldwin county. Perhaps we will see them start to condense on the Biloxi to Mobile area?
That is what I am thinking
Moderator: S2k Moderators
PTPatrick wrote:Icon actually a slight shift west, was Pensacola but looking more Baldwin county. Perhaps we will see them start to condense on the Biloxi to Mobile area?
Ivanhater wrote:PTPatrick wrote:Icon actually a slight shift west, was Pensacola but looking more Baldwin county. Perhaps we will see them start to condense on the Biloxi to Mobile area?
That is what I am thinking
pcolaman wrote:Ivanhater wrote:PTPatrick wrote:Icon actually a slight shift west, was Pensacola but looking more Baldwin county. Perhaps we will see them start to condense on the Biloxi to Mobile area?
That is what I am thinking
I think that's almost identical to 18z run.
Fancy1001 wrote:ICON deepens it to 964mb.
Steve wrote:Fancy1001 wrote:ICON deepens it to 964mb.
That’s pretty stout. The over a foot of rain on it is primarily Baldwin and Escambia Counties.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 1400&fh=36
pcolaman wrote:Steve wrote:Fancy1001 wrote:ICON deepens it to 964mb.
That’s pretty stout. The over a foot of rain on it is primarily Baldwin and Escambia Counties.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 1400&fh=36
WOW!!
Ivanhater wrote:Gfs coming in slightly west
bella_may wrote:GFS was stronger this run. 977 MB at landfall and a little further east closer to Gulfport
Ivanhater wrote:Stormcenter wrote:And probably shift back west a little tonight.
I think a good bet right now is the LA/MS border.Ivanhater wrote:What a huge change from this morning. All models big shift east and stronger
We will see but the models have been getting new data today and all models that show strengthening have moved east. So unless models come in weaker, I don't expect shifts west but it could happen
DestinHurricane wrote:Based on current organization trends, GFS is too weak. It is already stronger now than GFS has in 18 hours.
SconnieCane wrote:DestinHurricane wrote:Based on current organization trends, GFS is too weak. It is already stronger now than GFS has in 18 hours.
GFS (and other globals) also aren't high-res enough to use as precise intensity models.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests