gfsperpendicular wrote:Laminar wrote:Why do they retire names? Seems like such an unnecessary logistical nightmare. Random generate names at the start of each year. Done. Money and time saved.
Also a logistical nightmare: generating an entire unique 21-name list before every single year.
Hardly. Have a pool of 300 or so eligible names and off you go. Add a year number, and we’re done here. Or just keep it numerical, storm ONE of 2020. Etc...