SFLcane wrote:This certainly goes with Phil’s and 57’s idea of a super season oh boy.![]()
https://twitter.com/andyhazelton/status/1517986875637698568?s=21&t=WZ9zMMofShUkIsf_Vszbuw
You know it's bad when 57 goes bullish.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
SFLcane wrote:This certainly goes with Phil’s and 57’s idea of a super season oh boy.![]()
https://twitter.com/andyhazelton/status/1517986875637698568?s=21&t=WZ9zMMofShUkIsf_Vszbuw
skyline385 wrote:SFLcane wrote:This certainly goes with Phil’s and 57’s idea of a super season oh boy.![]()
https://twitter.com/andyhazelton/status/1517986875637698568?s=21&t=WZ9zMMofShUkIsf_Vszbuw
Let's wait for Phil to officially declare a hyperactive season first?
AnnularCane wrote:Would a cool MDR possibly make for a more active season, landfall-wise, by delaying development until the waves are further west?
Assuming, of course, it even stays cool.
JetFuel_SE wrote:SFLcane wrote:This certainly goes with Phil’s and 57’s idea of a super season oh boy.![]()
https://twitter.com/andyhazelton/status/1517986875637698568?s=21&t=WZ9zMMofShUkIsf_Vszbuw
You know it's bad when 57 goes bullish.
toad strangler wrote:skyline385 wrote:SFLcane wrote:This certainly goes with Phil’s and 57’s idea of a super season oh boy.![]()
https://twitter.com/andyhazelton/status/1517986875637698568?s=21&t=WZ9zMMofShUkIsf_Vszbuw
Let's wait for Phil to officially declare a hyperactive season first?
Don’t hold your breath.
Phil is not, under any circumstance, going to “officially declare” a hyperactive season. No matter how bullish he thinks indicators are or are not. That’s just not what he does.
He may comment on that in November sometime though!
SFLcane wrote:JetFuel_SE wrote:SFLcane wrote:This certainly goes with Phil’s and 57’s idea of a super season oh boy.![]()
https://twitter.com/andyhazelton/status/1517986875637698568?s=21&t=WZ9zMMofShUkIsf_Vszbuw
You know it's bad when 57 goes bullish.
Certainly! I just would like a bit more detail on why such a bullish season with ace reaching hyper levels of 170-190.
AlphaToOmega wrote:As for the 170-190 ACE, I can only speculate, but for the CSU June forecasts, four indices are used to predict the hurricane season: NAtl SSTs (analogous to AMO), subtropical NAtl pressures (analogous to NAO), trade winds over equatorial Pacific (analogous to ENSO), and SSTs east of Australia. Data have shown that May AMO and May SSTs east of Australia have positive correlations to ACE and that May NAO and May ENSO have negative correlations to ACE. Right now, it seems that the AMO is positive, that the SSTs east of Australia are positive, that the ENSO is negative, and that the NAO is negative. Plus, according to the April forecast, the models all showed a hyperactive season: the CSU's statistical model showed 168 ACE; the ECMWF showed 180 ACE; the UKMET showed 166 ACE; the JMA showed 231 ACE.
Category5Kaiju wrote:
Ahh no, don't jinx it!![]()
But no, seriously, that's quite impressive. I hope that luck holds up for this season and the future, but as always, Mother Nature does not care about feelings, and just because it has not happened anytime recently does not mean it cannot happen anytime soon. While I love tracking hurricanes, it'll make me sick to the stomach the day I find myself tracking a high end Cat 4 or Cat 5 hurricane barreling toward the populated regions of the east and west coasts of the state, especially knowing the damage and suffering that will likely ensue.
aspen wrote:I’m expecting 2022 to have some unexpected limiting factor that becomes a major part of predictions for the following season. In 2020, it was an unusual typhoon-pumped TUTT during September (although that didn’t do anything to stop Oct-Nov). In 2021, it was a combo of unusual MJO-dependency and possibly the Atlantic Niño in Oct-Nov. Who knows what 2022 will bring. Triple-dip Ninas are already uncommon, and this will be the first season in the 2016-onwards active phase (which has behaved differently to 1995-2012) to take place during one.
By “limiting factor”, I mean hostile conditions that don’t stop the season from producing ridiculous NS numbers, but keeps down the quality of storms during certain parts of the year. If Maysak and Haishen never formed and recurved the way they did to enhance that TUTT, 2020 could’ve hit 200 ACE with Paulette and Rene becoming stronger, higher-ACE hurricanes. While the exact cause for 2021’s late-season slump is still kinda debated, whatever it was probably prevented an additional 10-20+ ACE from at least one Caribbean hurricane.
Teban54 wrote:aspen wrote:I’m expecting 2022 to have some unexpected limiting factor that becomes a major part of predictions for the following season. In 2020, it was an unusual typhoon-pumped TUTT during September (although that didn’t do anything to stop Oct-Nov). In 2021, it was a combo of unusual MJO-dependency and possibly the Atlantic Niño in Oct-Nov. Who knows what 2022 will bring. Triple-dip Ninas are already uncommon, and this will be the first season in the 2016-onwards active phase (which has behaved differently to 1995-2012) to take place during one.
By “limiting factor”, I mean hostile conditions that don’t stop the season from producing ridiculous NS numbers, but keeps down the quality of storms during certain parts of the year. If Maysak and Haishen never formed and recurved the way they did to enhance that TUTT, 2020 could’ve hit 200 ACE with Paulette and Rene becoming stronger, higher-ACE hurricanes. While the exact cause for 2021’s late-season slump is still kinda debated, whatever it was probably prevented an additional 10-20+ ACE from at least one Caribbean hurricane.
I remember one of the very casual, unscientific but nevertheless interesting ideas I've read from this forum earlier regarding 2010-13: it felt like the Atlantic was gradually "running out of steam", with each year being less impressive quality-wise. Some claimed this was due to the lack of an El Nino, which they say "recharges" the basin for subsequent years.
Granted, 2010-13 were under a very different set of circumstances from 2020-22. 2012 was a failed El Nino, whereas 2022 started with a La Nina and will almost certainly be one during peak season. 2013 was an anomaly in itself. But I do wonder if there's some scientific reasoning behind this, and if it would throw us an oddball this year.
toad strangler wrote:Category5Kaiju wrote:
Ahh no, don't jinx it!![]()
But no, seriously, that's quite impressive. I hope that luck holds up for this season and the future, but as always, Mother Nature does not care about feelings, and just because it has not happened anytime recently does not mean it cannot happen anytime soon. While I love tracking hurricanes, it'll make me sick to the stomach the day I find myself tracking a high end Cat 4 or Cat 5 hurricane barreling toward the populated regions of the east and west coasts of the state, especially knowing the damage and suffering that will likely ensue.
Building codes are VASTLY better than they were back in the days of Andrew. As long as people leave mobile homes and flood zones almost all of us will be fine.
Also that map posted of recent strikes is old. Does not include Irma. I mean yeah the Keys aren’t part of the main peninsula but come on.
Kingarabian wrote:Teban54 wrote:aspen wrote:I’m expecting 2022 to have some unexpected limiting factor that becomes a major part of predictions for the following season. In 2020, it was an unusual typhoon-pumped TUTT during September (although that didn’t do anything to stop Oct-Nov). In 2021, it was a combo of unusual MJO-dependency and possibly the Atlantic Niño in Oct-Nov. Who knows what 2022 will bring. Triple-dip Ninas are already uncommon, and this will be the first season in the 2016-onwards active phase (which has behaved differently to 1995-2012) to take place during one.
By “limiting factor”, I mean hostile conditions that don’t stop the season from producing ridiculous NS numbers, but keeps down the quality of storms during certain parts of the year. If Maysak and Haishen never formed and recurved the way they did to enhance that TUTT, 2020 could’ve hit 200 ACE with Paulette and Rene becoming stronger, higher-ACE hurricanes. While the exact cause for 2021’s late-season slump is still kinda debated, whatever it was probably prevented an additional 10-20+ ACE from at least one Caribbean hurricane.
I remember one of the very casual, unscientific but nevertheless interesting ideas I've read from this forum earlier regarding 2010-13: it felt like the Atlantic was gradually "running out of steam", with each year being less impressive quality-wise. Some claimed this was due to the lack of an El Nino, which they say "recharges" the basin for subsequent years.
Granted, 2010-13 were under a very different set of circumstances from 2020-22. 2012 was a failed El Nino, whereas 2022 started with a La Nina and will almost certainly be one during peak season. 2013 was an anomaly in itself. But I do wonder if there's some scientific reasoning behind this, and if it would throw us an oddball this year.
The big curve ball is that 3rd year Nina's although they do happen, they are not common. Historically year three of a three peat La Nina results in a slower Atlantic hurricane season compared to the previous two.
NotSparta wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Teban54 wrote:I remember one of the very casual, unscientific but nevertheless interesting ideas I've read from this forum earlier regarding 2010-13: it felt like the Atlantic was gradually "running out of steam", with each year being less impressive quality-wise. Some claimed this was due to the lack of an El Nino, which they say "recharges" the basin for subsequent years.
Granted, 2010-13 were under a very different set of circumstances from 2020-22. 2012 was a failed El Nino, whereas 2022 started with a La Nina and will almost certainly be one during peak season. 2013 was an anomaly in itself. But I do wonder if there's some scientific reasoning behind this, and if it would throw us an oddball this year.
The big curve ball is that 3rd year Nina's although they do happen, they are not common. Historically year three of a three peat La Nina results in a slower Atlantic hurricane season compared to the previous two.
Those 3 years were all generally -AMO so it could just be the sample size messing with things. At the same time the long-lived nature of those -ENSO events could push things towards -AMO so it's probably a bit of a chicken and egg thing. Probably better to not look at 3rd year Niñas too closely given the lack of them and the possibility that this season does not resemble those as much aside from ENSO
toad strangler wrote:Category5Kaiju wrote:
Ahh no, don't jinx it!![]()
But no, seriously, that's quite impressive. I hope that luck holds up for this season and the future, but as always, Mother Nature does not care about feelings, and just because it has not happened anytime recently does not mean it cannot happen anytime soon. While I love tracking hurricanes, it'll make me sick to the stomach the day I find myself tracking a high end Cat 4 or Cat 5 hurricane barreling toward the populated regions of the east and west coasts of the state, especially knowing the damage and suffering that will likely ensue.
Building codes are VASTLY better than they were back in the days of Andrew. As long as people leave mobile homes and flood zones almost all of us will be fine.
Also that map posted of recent strikes is old. Does not include Irma. I mean yeah the Keys aren’t part of the main peninsula but come on.
Teban54 wrote:aspen wrote:I’m expecting 2022 to have some unexpected limiting factor that becomes a major part of predictions for the following season. In 2020, it was an unusual typhoon-pumped TUTT during September (although that didn’t do anything to stop Oct-Nov). In 2021, it was a combo of unusual MJO-dependency and possibly the Atlantic Niño in Oct-Nov. Who knows what 2022 will bring. Triple-dip Ninas are already uncommon, and this will be the first season in the 2016-onwards active phase (which has behaved differently to 1995-2012) to take place during one.
By “limiting factor”, I mean hostile conditions that don’t stop the season from producing ridiculous NS numbers, but keeps down the quality of storms during certain parts of the year. If Maysak and Haishen never formed and recurved the way they did to enhance that TUTT, 2020 could’ve hit 200 ACE with Paulette and Rene becoming stronger, higher-ACE hurricanes. While the exact cause for 2021’s late-season slump is still kinda debated, whatever it was probably prevented an additional 10-20+ ACE from at least one Caribbean hurricane.
I remember one of the very casual, unscientific but nevertheless interesting ideas I've read from this forum earlier regarding 2010-13: it felt like the Atlantic was gradually "running out of steam", with each year being less impressive quality-wise. Some claimed this was due to the lack of an El Nino, which they say "recharges" the basin for subsequent years.
Granted, 2010-13 were under a very different set of circumstances from 2020-22. 2012 was a failed El Nino, whereas 2022 started with a La Nina and will almost certainly be one during peak season. 2013 was an anomaly in itself. But I do wonder if there's some scientific reasoning behind this, and if it would throw us an oddball this year.
Users browsing this forum: duilaslol, Hurricane2022 and 49 guests