2022 Indicators (SSTs/SAL/MSLP/Shear/Steering/Instability) and >Day 16 Models

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#641 Postby AlphaToOmega » Thu May 05, 2022 11:04 am

Something is definitely fishy about the ECMWF. It shows a -AMM horseshoe during the peak season, yet it shows an ACE 130% the 1993-2016 average.
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#642 Postby SFLcane » Thu May 05, 2022 11:29 am

AlphaToOmega wrote:Something is definitely fishy about the ECMWF. It shows a -AMM horseshoe during the peak season, yet it shows an ACE 130% the 1993-2016 average.


it's going heavy on the Caribbean which Makes sense given the strong ridge over the entire CONUS.

Image

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#643 Postby SFLcane » Thu May 05, 2022 11:33 am

I think it should cause those who have been predicting hyperactivity to slow down.
1 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145318
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#644 Postby cycloneye » Thu May 05, 2022 11:59 am

SFLcane wrote:I think it should cause those who have been predicting hyperactivity to slow down.


Some private companys went very high on numbers and ACE. Waiting for NOAA in the next few days. See Expert forecasts thread
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#645 Postby AlphaToOmega » Thu May 05, 2022 12:20 pm

We need to see what this does:

Image
4 likes   

User avatar
DorkyMcDorkface
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 888
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 1:32 pm
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#646 Postby DorkyMcDorkface » Thu May 05, 2022 12:35 pm

DorkyMcDorkface wrote:A little confused at the SEAS5's graphically bearish signal in tandem with an ACE prediction of 130% of average. Unless it's expecting a bunch of Caribbean Cruisers it doesn't make a lot of sense to me...
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/971770953979813908/ps2png-worker-commands-7c47f6996d-7pm8d-6fe5cac1a363ec1525f54343b6cc9fd8-LVjH_T.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/971796572893487144/20220505_113232.jpg

Another oddity is that the WAM seems unusually weak, at least for this current era we're in.
Image
1 likes   
Please note the thougths expressed by this account are solely those of the user and are from a hobbyist perspective. For more comprehensive analysis, consult an actual professional meteorologist or meteorology agency.


Floyd 1999 | Isabel 2003 | Hanna 2008 | Irene 2011 | Sandy 2012 | Isaias 2020

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4097
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#647 Postby Category5Kaiju » Thu May 05, 2022 12:44 pm

DorkyMcDorkface wrote:
DorkyMcDorkface wrote:A little confused at the SEAS5's graphically bearish signal in tandem with an ACE prediction of 130% of average. Unless it's expecting a bunch of Caribbean Cruisers it doesn't make a lot of sense to me...
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/971770953979813908/ps2png-worker-commands-7c47f6996d-7pm8d-6fe5cac1a363ec1525f54343b6cc9fd8-LVjH_T.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/971796572893487144/20220505_113232.jpg

Another oddity is that the WAM seems unusually weak, at least for this current era we're in.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/971827046533697566/seas5_qpfa_3mon_nafrica_ASO.png


Wait...what?? :lol:

Yeah, I am not sure if that will pan out, unless something happens and the strong WAM we've been consistently seeing the past years suddenly falters.
0 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145318
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#648 Postby cycloneye » Thu May 05, 2022 12:49 pm

ECMWF=165 ACE. Those peeps worried dont panic. :D

 https://twitter.com/philklotzbach/status/1522271780542558211


0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#649 Postby AlphaToOmega » Thu May 05, 2022 12:50 pm

cycloneye wrote:ECMWF=165 ACE. Those peeps worried dont panic. :D

https://twitter.com/philklotzbach/status/1522271780542558211


I wonder why the ECMWF outputs ACE at a percentage of a climatological mean instead of outputting a raw ACE value.
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#650 Postby aspen » Thu May 05, 2022 1:07 pm

cycloneye wrote:ECMWF=165 ACE. Those peeps worried dont panic. :D

https://twitter.com/philklotzbach/status/1522271780542558211

So this month’s ECMWF run predicts a lack of a +AMO and a nearly dead ITCZ…and yet it still gets 165 ACE. Unless we’re missing something, this run doesn’t make a ton of sense.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
DorkyMcDorkface
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 888
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 1:32 pm
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#651 Postby DorkyMcDorkface » Thu May 05, 2022 1:13 pm

AlphaToOmega wrote:
cycloneye wrote:ECMWF=165 ACE. Those peeps worried dont panic. :D

https://twitter.com/philklotzbach/status/1522271780542558211


I wonder why the ECMWF outputs ACE at a percentage of a climatological mean instead of outputting a raw ACE value.

I think my biggest question is why they're using that climo in particular. 1993-2021 is overwhelmingly +AMO.
0 likes   

Please note the thougths expressed by this account are solely those of the user and are from a hobbyist perspective. For more comprehensive analysis, consult an actual professional meteorologist or meteorology agency.


Floyd 1999 | Isabel 2003 | Hanna 2008 | Irene 2011 | Sandy 2012 | Isaias 2020

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4097
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#652 Postby Category5Kaiju » Thu May 05, 2022 1:15 pm

aspen wrote:
cycloneye wrote:ECMWF=165 ACE. Those peeps worried dont panic. :D

https://twitter.com/philklotzbach/status/1522271780542558211

So this month’s ECMWF run predicts a lack of a +AMO and a nearly dead ITCZ…and yet it still gets 165 ACE. Unless we’re missing something, this run doesn’t make a ton of sense.


I guarantee you that if we get a hyperactive season despite a -AMO and a dead ITCZ, then this season will go down in history and be talked about as a reference season for many years to come :lol: . But yes, seriously I agree, imho there's something very wrong with what this run just generated.
0 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#653 Postby SFLcane » Thu May 05, 2022 1:31 pm

cycloneye wrote:ECMWF=165 ACE. Those peeps worried dont panic. :D

https://twitter.com/philklotzbach/status/1522271780542558211


Something is off with that ace especially 165 considering everything else its predicting.
0 likes   

User avatar
NotSparta
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1670
Age: 23
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Naples, FL
Contact:

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#654 Postby NotSparta » Thu May 05, 2022 1:54 pm

aspen wrote:
cycloneye wrote:ECMWF=165 ACE. Those peeps worried dont panic. :D

https://twitter.com/philklotzbach/status/1522271780542558211

So this month’s ECMWF run predicts a lack of a +AMO and a nearly dead ITCZ…and yet it still gets 165 ACE. Unless we’re missing something, this run doesn’t make a ton of sense.


2022 effect. No matter what, models will still print out a hyperactive (>= 160 ACE) season
0 likes   
This post was probably an opinion of mine, and in no way is official. Please refer to http://www.hurricanes.gov for official tropical analysis and advisories.

My website, with lots of tropical wx graphics, including satellite and recon: http://cyclonicwx.com

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#655 Postby AlphaToOmega » Thu May 05, 2022 2:08 pm

NotSparta wrote:
aspen wrote:
cycloneye wrote:ECMWF=165 ACE. Those peeps worried dont panic. :D

https://twitter.com/philklotzbach/status/1522271780542558211

So this month’s ECMWF run predicts a lack of a +AMO and a nearly dead ITCZ…and yet it still gets 165 ACE. Unless we’re missing something, this run doesn’t make a ton of sense.


2022 effect. No matter what, models will still print out a hyperactive (>= 160 ACE) season


Is the model trying to correct for something? 165 ACE seems reasonable for this season's projected base state for ASO (+AMO, -PDO, +AMM, -ENSO, and Atlantic Nina), but not for the ECMWF's projected base state. Maybe the ECMWF is trying to correct its warm ENSO bias, cool MDR bias, and dry West Africa bias for the hurricane totals but nothing else. If you want to know, ask the people who maintain the ECMWF, not me. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ENSO Updates

#656 Postby toad strangler » Thu May 05, 2022 3:00 pm

NotSparta wrote:
toad strangler wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:I'm just waiting for someone to say it.


well, that wraps it up. It's over. See you next May! :wink:

So I'm kinda old school and lean heavily on CSU and NOAA forecasts as the biggest indicators in my thought process over any modeling. Bullish or Bearish don't matter. So I wait patiently for NOAA to help guide my initial thoughts on the season.


Ironically, part of the reason CSU went so high is because of their modeling


Ya, part. But they aren't cliff jumping weenies like many of us from model to model :lol: And thus, WHY waiting for NOAA to chime in as well is the most prudent thing to do IMO.
4 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#657 Postby aspen » Thu May 05, 2022 4:04 pm

If the ECMWF is right about a very weak WAM and ITCZ, then there must be something we’re missing right now. Maybe we’ve missed some indicators, or what happened in ON 2021 has led to suppressive impacts for 2022. How has precipitation in Africa this year compare to 2020 and 2021 by this point?
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9288
Age: 21
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#658 Postby Iceresistance » Thu May 05, 2022 4:05 pm

I'm surprised that no one has noticed how fast the Atlantic MDR warmed, it's +0.5°C warmer compared to Mid-April!
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
NotSparta
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1670
Age: 23
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Naples, FL
Contact:

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#659 Postby NotSparta » Thu May 05, 2022 4:06 pm

aspen wrote:If the ECMWF is right about a very weak WAM and ITCZ, then there must be something we’re missing right now. Maybe we’ve missed some indicators, or what happened in ON 2021 has led to suppressive impacts for 2022. How has precipitation in Africa this year compare to 2020 and 2021 by this point?


Probably won't be right. The weak WAM is a very well-known ECMWF bias
1 likes   
This post was probably an opinion of mine, and in no way is official. Please refer to http://www.hurricanes.gov for official tropical analysis and advisories.

My website, with lots of tropical wx graphics, including satellite and recon: http://cyclonicwx.com

User avatar
NotSparta
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1670
Age: 23
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Naples, FL
Contact:

Re: 2022 indicators: SSTs / SAL / MSLP / shear / steering / instability / images

#660 Postby NotSparta » Thu May 05, 2022 4:07 pm

Iceresistance wrote:I'm surprised that no one has noticed how fast the Atlantic MDR warmed, it's +0.5°C warmer compared to Mid-April!


What do you mean? When it was still warming that's all everyone was talking about lol
1 likes   
This post was probably an opinion of mine, and in no way is official. Please refer to http://www.hurricanes.gov for official tropical analysis and advisories.

My website, with lots of tropical wx graphics, including satellite and recon: http://cyclonicwx.com


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Javlin, Kennethb and 44 guests