ElectricStorm wrote:07L FIONA 220920 0000 20.3N 70.1W ATL 95 974
Nice to see they correctly adjusted BT up to 95 kt/110 mph. I understand why they were hesitant to go to 110 at 0z, but it became obvious shortly after.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
ElectricStorm wrote:07L FIONA 220920 0000 20.3N 70.1W ATL 95 974
cheezyWXguy wrote:New eye dropsonde shows 970mb with 17kt, should be good for 968mb. Clearly still strengthening.
cheezyWXguy wrote:New eye dropsonde shows 970mb with 17kt, should be good for 968mb. Clearly still strengthening.
wx98 wrote:Looks like both recons are going home. Wish one could've gotten one more NE eyewall pass.
InfernoFlameCat wrote:Fiona has shifted near due west. I do not think that was part of the track forecasted.
FrontRunner wrote:wx98 wrote:Looks like both recons are going home. Wish one could've gotten one more NE eyewall pass.
I'm not too familiar with the recon scheduling, but anyone know why they'd have two in there at the same time rather than trying to stagger them in order to minimize the gaps in coverage?
wx98 wrote:InfernoFlameCat wrote:Fiona has shifted near due west. I do not think that was part of the track forecasted.
Just a wobble. Those really can't be forecast along a smoothed 5-day track. Well within the cone.
wx98 wrote:Looks like both recons are going home. Wish one could've gotten one more NE eyewall pass.
EDIT: The AF plane is going back in. NOAA is going home.
Hammy wrote:Ironic the winds were raised to 95kt when the last pass shows it's down again to 85.
Hammy wrote:Ironic the winds were raised to 95kt when the last pass shows it's down again to 85.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests