j wrote:SO....not to pick on you specifically OG, but what you are inferring is that one day its (the fetus) a tissue mass, the next day its a life worthy of the chance to breath.
How exactly is this 'point" determined? A doctor's judegement? I mean its not like deciding what to wear based on the temperature outside.
I'm on the "other" side, and I give the tissue mass the benefit of the doubt since I can't ask said fetus if it would prefer to live or die.
Correct me if I'm morally wrong.
Ah morals. Morals are different for everyone. You don't have my morals or anyone elses morals so you really can't be morally wrong.
Again- it depends on your deffinition of the beginning of life. I
personally am of a mind that once a fetus can live outside the womb (if given a chance) then it's alive. BUT that's a very personal determinant and I don't look down on people who believe that life begins at conception- or people who believe that life begins at birth.
But I've said from the very beginning of explaining my abortion stance that I could, within my own moral code, never be able to live with myself if I had an abortion. Life is just too precious to me and life from myself is so wonderful that there are many things, including my life, that I might be willing to give up in exchange to give that little bit of life a chance to grow.
BUT I won't dictate others views on life or death and I leave those choices in thier hands. It's between me and god- the choices that I make. Not anyone else. I give myself no right to stand and pass judgement on someone who would choose differently... or who believes differently.
I don't judge. It's not my place in life and my choices reflect that. It's a very zen thing for me. I only offer my opinions- I don't seek to condemn or change others opinions- only to offer them a view into my head... if that changes them- then that's between themselves and whatever diety they choose. (or jsut themselves if they choose none)
Therefore I am pro-choice... even if I am inherently pro-life.