ATL: LEE - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- HurricaneBelle
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:12 pm
- Location: Clearwater, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion
3 likes
Re: ATL: THIRTEEN - Tropical Depression - Discussion
Special Message from NHC Issued 5 Sep 2023 14:13 UTC
NHC will initiate advisories on Tropical Depression Thirteen, located over the central tropical Atlantic Ocean, at 1100 AM AST (1500 UTC).
NHC will initiate advisories on Tropical Depression Thirteen, located over the central tropical Atlantic Ocean, at 1100 AM AST (1500 UTC).
3 likes
Re: ATL: THIRTEEN - Tropical Depression - Discussion
How high do you think they’ll put the first peak at? I’m thinking 100 kt, maybe even 105 kt. There’s strong model support for a major within 5 days and the NHC has been pretty aggressive with it in the TWOs.
5 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion
cycloneye wrote:AL, 95, 2023090512, , BEST, 0, 122N, 396W, 30, 1008, LO
https://i.imgur.com/hnw6HkX.png
The 0Z UKMET initialized at 12.5N, 37.4W. The Best Track had 95L at 11.2N, 36.2W at 0Z; 11.5N, 37.5W at 6Z; and at 12.2N, 39.6W at 12Z. So, the 0Z UK initialized 1.3 further N and 1.2 further W or 120 miles NW of the Best Track position. However, 95L has moved about 3:1 W by N from 0Z to 12Z rather than moving the 1:1 of straight NW. Thus, the 12Z Best Track position is 150 miles W of the 0Z UK initialization.
Translation: the 12Z UKMET track may very well initialize nearly due W vs its 0Z initialization. We'll see whether or not that translates to the 12Z UK track being even further W to SW of the already far W to SW 0Z run vs the other models, but that's quite possible.
*Edited
Last edited by LarryWx on Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
3 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion
Buck wrote:At the start of the season, Lee was one of the names I pegged to be one of the “baddies” of the year (either in intensity or impact). Looks like it could be trending that way. Expecting advisories in an hour.
on intensity for sure, impact....not so much thankfully
0 likes
Re: ATL: THIRTEEN - Tropical Depression - Discussion
aspen wrote:How high do you think they’ll put the first peak at? I’m thinking 100 kt, maybe even 105 kt. There’s strong model support for a major within 5 days and the NHC has been pretty aggressive with it in the TWOs.
Based on the models (see my recent post in the models thread) they are all at least at 115 kt at the +120 hrs point. And with 'all' I mean even ECMWF and GFS. Of course even if the models say so 115+ kt is a crazy first advisory. But I do think they'll go major so at least 100 kt. If there's ever a time to go 105 kt in the first advisory this is it.
0 likes
Re: RE: Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion
Anything over 120 hours is going to be inaccurate. Impact could still be 240 hours out. Multiple recent GFS runs have brought this over my house. I understand these storms can be nerve racking, but you're downplaying something that's far from a done deal. Impacts are definitely still up in the air.mantis83 wrote:Buck wrote:At the start of the season, Lee was one of the names I pegged to be one of the “baddies” of the year (either in intensity or impact). Looks like it could be trending that way. Expecting advisories in an hour.
on intensity for sure, impact....not so much thankfully
4 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4030
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion
LarryWx wrote:cycloneye wrote:AL, 95, 2023090512, , BEST, 0, 122N, 396W, 30, 1008, LO
https://i.imgur.com/hnw6HkX.png
The 0Z UKMET initialized at 12.5N, 37.4W. The Best Track had 95L at 11.2N, 36.2W at 0Z; 11.5N, 37.5W at 6Z; and at 12.2N, 39.6W at 12Z. So, the 0Z UK initialized 1.3 further N and 1.2 further W or 120 miles NW of the Best Track position. However, 95L has moved about 3:1 W by N from 0Z to 12Z rather than moving the 1:1 of straight NW. Thus, the 12Z Best Track position is 150 miles W of the 0Z UK initialization.
Translation: the 0Z UKMET track was too far N and thus will likely initialize further S for the 12Z run vs its 0Z track. We'll see whether or not that translates to the 12Z UK track being even further W to SW of the already far W to SW 0Z run vs the other models, but that's quite possible.
Here's 0z UKMET plotted in red, TD#13 best track in blue.

2 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6108
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion
AutoPenalti wrote:LarryWx wrote:cycloneye wrote:AL, 95, 2023090512, , BEST, 0, 122N, 396W, 30, 1008, LO
https://i.imgur.com/hnw6HkX.png
The 0Z UKMET initialized at 12.5N, 37.4W. The Best Track had 95L at 11.2N, 36.2W at 0Z; 11.5N, 37.5W at 6Z; and at 12.2N, 39.6W at 12Z. So, the 0Z UK initialized 1.3 further N and 1.2 further W or 120 miles NW of the Best Track position. However, 95L has moved about 3:1 W by N from 0Z to 12Z rather than moving the 1:1 of straight NW. Thus, the 12Z Best Track position is 150 miles W of the 0Z UK initialization.
Translation: the 0Z UKMET track was too far N and thus will likely initialize further S for the 12Z run vs its 0Z track. We'll see whether or not that translates to the 12Z UK track being even further W to SW of the already far W to SW 0Z run vs the other models, but that's quite possible.
Here's 0z UKMET plotted in red, TD#13 best track in blue.
https://i.imgur.com/Rtv3JkA.png
Over the years I’ve noticed a consistent south or west bias to the ukmet, and the only storm I can really recall it doing well with is Ian. I think it might have been the one that first saw the more southern track for Irma, but it’s been too long for me to recall exactly. That said, if it ends up being right with Lee I’ll take back all the bad things I’ve said about it, because it’s basically down there on its own for now.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion
AutoPenalti wrote:LarryWx wrote:cycloneye wrote:AL, 95, 2023090512, , BEST, 0, 122N, 396W, 30, 1008, LO
https://i.imgur.com/hnw6HkX.png
The 0Z UKMET initialized at 12.5N, 37.4W. The Best Track had 95L at 11.2N, 36.2W at 0Z; 11.5N, 37.5W at 6Z; and at 12.2N, 39.6W at 12Z. So, the 0Z UK initialized 1.3 further N and 1.2 further W or 120 miles NW of the Best Track position. However, 95L has moved about 3:1 W by N from 0Z to 12Z rather than moving the 1:1 of straight NW. Thus, the 12Z Best Track position is 150 miles W of the 0Z UK initialization.
Translation: the 0Z UKMET track was too far N and thus will likely initialize further S for the 12Z run vs its 0Z track. We'll see whether or not that translates to the 12Z UK track being even further W to SW of the already far W to SW 0Z run vs the other models, but that's quite possible.
Here's 0z UKMET plotted in red, TD#13 best track in blue.
https://i.imgur.com/Rtv3JkA.png
Thanks. I reworded the last part of my post to this:
Translation: the 12Z UKMET track may very well initialize nearly due W vs its 0Z initialization. We'll see whether or not that translates to the 12Z UK track being even further W to SW of the already far W to SW 0Z run vs the other models, but that's quite possible.
Last edited by LarryWx on Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4030
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion
cheezyWXguy wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:LarryWx wrote:
The 0Z UKMET initialized at 12.5N, 37.4W. The Best Track had 95L at 11.2N, 36.2W at 0Z; 11.5N, 37.5W at 6Z; and at 12.2N, 39.6W at 12Z. So, the 0Z UK initialized 1.3 further N and 1.2 further W or 120 miles NW of the Best Track position. However, 95L has moved about 3:1 W by N from 0Z to 12Z rather than moving the 1:1 of straight NW. Thus, the 12Z Best Track position is 150 miles W of the 0Z UK initialization.
Translation: the 0Z UKMET track was too far N and thus will likely initialize further S for the 12Z run vs its 0Z track. We'll see whether or not that translates to the 12Z UK track being even further W to SW of the already far W to SW 0Z run vs the other models, but that's quite possible.
Here's 0z UKMET plotted in red, TD#13 best track in blue.
https://i.imgur.com/Rtv3JkA.png
Over the years I’ve noticed a consistent south or west bias to the ukmet, and the only storm I can really recall it doing well with is Ian. I think it might have been the one that first saw the more southern track for Irma, but it’s been too long for me to recall exactly. That said, if it ends up being right with Lee I’ll take back all the bad things I’ve said about it, because it’s basically down there on its own for now.
FWIW, the ICON has been following suit as well and it seems some ensembles are starting to show it being left behind. We'll see.
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 9155
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am
Re: ATL: THIRTEEN - Tropical Depression - Discussion
What will the environmental conditions be like over the depression as it moves along across the Atlantic? Are they favorable for the system to continuously increase in intensity? I refrain from venturing to guess where the cyclone may wind up....
0 likes
- Iceresistance
- Category 5
- Posts: 9288
- Age: 21
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
- Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK
Re: ATL: THIRTEEN - Tropical Depression - Discussion
8 likes
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020
Winter 2020-2021
All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.
Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.
Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information
Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!
Winter 2020-2021

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.
Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.
Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information
Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!
- zal0phus
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 192
- Age: 24
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:32 am
- Location: St. Louis
- Contact:
Re: ATL: THIRTEEN - Tropical Depression - Discussion
Iceresistance wrote:Wind Shear is useless against TD 13
https://s11.gifyu.com/images/Sg1PG.png
https://s11.gifyu.com/images/Sg1PG.png
It's getting the shrimp look already. I don't like this one
0 likes
Do not take anything I say seriously as a form of meteorological prediction. I am not a meteorologist; I don't think being in law school translates to any special knowledge. I am just a somewhat bullish amateur watcher.
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 5044
- Age: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: ATL: THIRTEEN - Tropical Depression - Discussion
Good lord

OUTLOOK VALID 10/1200Z 21.5N 63.5W
MAX WIND 120 KT...GUSTS 145 KT.
MAX WIND 120 KT...GUSTS 145 KT.
7 likes
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
- Iceresistance
- Category 5
- Posts: 9288
- Age: 21
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
- Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK
Re: ATL: THIRTEEN - Tropical Depression - Discussion
ElectricStorm wrote:Good lord
OUTLOOK VALID 10/1200Z 21.5N 63.5W
MAX WIND 120 KT...GUSTS 145 KT.
I have never seen this wording before
...FORECAST TO BECOME A POWERFUL HURRICANE BY THE END OF THE WEEK...
EDIT: Wait a minute, Category 5 gusts??
Last edited by Iceresistance on Tue Sep 05, 2023 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020
Winter 2020-2021
All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.
Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.
Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information
Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!
Winter 2020-2021

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.
Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.
Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information
Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!
Re: ATL: THIRTEEN - Tropical Depression - Discussion
Seeing info on Franklin at the TD13 link on the NHC page. Hope they get that sorted soon.
EDIT: Never mind
EDIT: Never mind
Last edited by abajan on Tue Sep 05, 2023 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL: THIRTEEN - Tropical Depression - Discussion
TROPICAL DEPRESSION CENTER LOCATED NEAR 12.5N 40.2W AT 05/1500Z
POSITION ACCURATE WITHIN 30 NM
PRESENT MOVEMENT TOWARD THE WEST-NORTHWEST OR 285 DEGREES AT 13 KT
Already moving WNW...
I trust the NHC but still looks more W to me.
Last edited by blp on Tue Sep 05, 2023 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 4
- Posts: 935
- Age: 24
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion: 2 PM TWO: 90%/100%
kevin wrote:zhukm29 wrote:I wonder if future 13L will be one of those rare systems with a M in its first advisory. I think only Tomas and Sam had a 100kt forecast point in advisory 1, but with the model guidance going absolutely nuts, this could be our next candidate.
I have a nice overview for this. Posted it with Larry and Sam, here is the updated version for the first advisory peak intensity. Based on NHC advisories since 1998 (of which the 1998 - 2002 advisories only went to +72 hrs).
100 kt
2021 - Sam
2010 - Tomas
95 kt
2022 - Ian
2021 - Ida
2020 - Iota
2019 - Lorenzo
2012 - Isaac
2010 - Danielle
2005 - Philippe
2004 - Karl
90 kt
2021 - Larry
2017 - Jose
2016 - Matthew
2009 - Bill
2007 - Dean
85 kt
2020 - Delta
2015 - Danny
2014 - Gonzalo
2011 - Katia
2010 - Earl
2010 - Igor
2006 - Helene
2005 - Wilma
80 kt
2022 - Danielle
2020 - Teddy
2019 - Jerry
2017 - Irma
2017 - Maria
2016 - Gaston
2012 - Leslie
2005 - Rita
2004 - Earl
1999 - Emily
Edit: Thanks SconnieCane, added Irma to the 80 kt list.
Edit2: Thanks Extratropical94 for the other 3 additions.
Aaaand now this thing was blown out of the water. Holy poop
9 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests