Also, the piece of energy we are interested in is still part of the larger trough in the NPAC and hasn't sheared off yet.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

bubba hotep wrote:Not sure it means much, given it's the 12k NAM, but the s/w is stronger and slower through 57hrs.
Also, the piece of energy we are interested in is still part of the larger trough in the NPAC and hasn't sheared off yet.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2024011118/gfs_z500_vort_namer_2.png


Ntxw wrote:Brent wrote:Ntxw wrote:18z Euro is mostly snow north of I-20. Makes sense, it's hard to mix with such low temps. Mixed bag south into C TX.
It's way drier though which concerns me. We've come too far today to go backwards and I really hope the 0z reserves it
For Oklahoma yeah. For TX we are trending better. There's an STJ linkage. Two precip shields converging.
The STJ component is wild card. It will provide much more qpf the more it can get injected into the flow within the southern sector. This is why guidance intensifies the band as it crosses Red River.


rwfromkansas wrote:Ntxw wrote:Brent wrote:
It's way drier though which concerns me. We've come too far today to go backwards and I really hope the 0z reserves it
For Oklahoma yeah. For TX we are trending better. There's an STJ linkage. Two precip shields converging.
The STJ component is wild card. It will provide much more qpf the more it can get injected into the flow within the southern sector. This is why guidance intensifies the band as it crosses Red River.
Unless a Gulf low sucks up all the moisture like happens a lot it seems. Lol.



Texas Snow wrote:rwfromkansas wrote:Ntxw wrote:
For Oklahoma yeah. For TX we are trending better. There's an STJ linkage. Two precip shields converging.
The STJ component is wild card. It will provide much more qpf the more it can get injected into the flow within the southern sector. This is why guidance intensifies the band as it crosses Red River.
Unless a Gulf low sucks up all the moisture like happens a lot it seems. Lol.
https://media1.tenor.com/m/UwSX0RlXgWMAAAAd/you-take-that-back-take-that-back.gif

rwfromkansas wrote:Ntxw wrote:Brent wrote:
It's way drier though which concerns me. We've come too far today to go backwards and I really hope the 0z reserves it
For Oklahoma yeah. For TX we are trending better. There's an STJ linkage. Two precip shields converging.
The STJ component is wild card. It will provide much more qpf the more it can get injected into the flow within the southern sector. This is why guidance intensifies the band as it crosses Red River.
Unless a Gulf low sucks up all the moisture like happens a lot it seems. Lol.

orangeblood wrote:Now in RGEM range…
https://images.weatherbell.com/model/rgem-all/tx/instant_ptype/1705017600/1705320000-agCp97IYWXc.png



mmmmsnouts wrote:Liquid equivalent of sleet averages 2.5 to 1 so you would need roughly 0.4” QPF to get an inch of sleet. That RGEM run might not even be enough to mess up the roads in DFW.






bubba hotep wrote:Not sure it means much, given it's the 12k NAM, but the s/w is stronger and slower through 57hrs.
Also, the piece of energy we are interested in is still part of the larger trough in the NPAC and hasn't sheared off yet.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2024011118/gfs_z500_vort_namer_2.png


Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], LarryWx and 138 guests