jaguars_22 wrote:Latest gfs is good news! Much weaker!
Looking at the satellite I’m sure it’s probably back up to 970 mb or higher… what you think?
Recon has 953 mb so far
Moderator: S2k Moderators
jaguars_22 wrote:Latest gfs is good news! Much weaker!
Looking at the satellite I’m sure it’s probably back up to 970 mb or higher… what you think?
TomballEd wrote:Has WxMan57 posted with his thoughts about the final MX/STX landfall location and intensity ideas since the 0Z models w/ G-IV data? In 20 years on weather forums, his is the professional voice I trust in the tropics.
jaguars_22 wrote:Latest gfs is good news! Much weaker!
Looking at the satellite I’m sure it’s probably back up to 970 mb or higher… what you think?
underthwx wrote:TomballEd wrote:Has WxMan57 posted with his thoughts about the final MX/STX landfall location and intensity ideas since the 0Z models w/ G-IV data? In 20 years on weather forums, his is the professional voice I trust in the tropics.
Im sure xman is plenty busy providing forecasts for his clients....but fear not....plenty of expertise right here....
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Very rapid pressure rise, Beryl's getting the stuffing knocked out of it.
Odeseus wrote:Anyone else notice a “blob” structure to the east? Reminds me of Matthew in the same general location in 2016.
tolakram wrote:https://i.imgur.com/iqREdfj.gif
InfernoFlameCat wrote:tolakram wrote:https://i.imgur.com/iqREdfj.gif
Looks like it’s trying to wrap around the core agaib
GCANE wrote:Odeseus wrote:Anyone else notice a “blob” structure to the east? Reminds me of Matthew in the same general location in 2016.
A smaller one is to the south of that.
IMHO its an indication of a feeder band with associated vigorous convection
InfernoFlameCat wrote:tolakram wrote:https://i.imgur.com/iqREdfj.gif
Looks like it’s trying to wrap around the core agaib
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests