MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:capNstorms wrote:beryl is about to go over some 93 octane water, i see some RI in the future
None of the models or pro mets think this.
that's why we are in this forum
Moderator: S2k Moderators
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:capNstorms wrote:beryl is about to go over some 93 octane water, i see some RI in the future
None of the models or pro mets think this.
Wampadawg wrote:Xyls wrote:Giving Alicia 1983 vibes.
Why is it giving you Alicia vibes?
Can you link to your source for CAPE? You are seeing numbers much higher than the global models. Perhaps a satellite derived product? It sounds like you are referencing real time estimates.GCANE wrote:CAPE now up to 5500.
Super nice feeder band.
She is really drinking the juice this morning.
rickcorvin wrote:Can you link to your source for CAPE? You are seeing numbers much higher than the global models. Perhaps a satellite derived product? It sounds like you are referencing real time estimates.GCANE wrote:CAPE now up to 5500.
Super nice feeder band.
She is really drinking the juice this morning.
capNstorms wrote:MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:capNstorms wrote:beryl is about to go over some 93 octane water, i see some RI in the future
None of the models or pro mets think this.
that's why we are in this forum
ROCK wrote:This is Humberto 2.0. Once the land friction kicks in it will fill in even more .definitely stacked now.
GCANE wrote:rickcorvin wrote:Can you link to your source for CAPE? You are seeing numbers much higher than the global models. Perhaps a satellite derived product? It sounds like you are referencing real time estimates.GCANE wrote:CAPE now up to 5500.
Super nice feeder band.
She is really drinking the juice this morning.
SPC
https://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/mesoanal ... sector=15#
& COD
https://weather.cod.edu/satrad/?parms=r ... =undefined
IcyTundra wrote: https://x.com/mattlanza/status/1809240462592512402
Pro mets in Houston are very confident that Beryl isn't much of a risk to Galveston. Let's hope they are right.
capNstorms wrote:IcyTundra wrote: https://x.com/mattlanza/status/1809240462592512402
Pro mets in Houston are very confident that Beryl isn't much of a risk to Galveston. Let's hope they are right.
"Pro mets in Houston are very confident that Beryl isn't much of a risk to Galveston"
oh have the tables have turned
rockice wrote:Definitely don't think they are done with their track yet,RECON data suggests Beryl is slowing down hmmm?
BobHarlem wrote:capNstorms wrote:MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:
None of the models or pro mets think this.
that's why we are in this forum
Ri chance is about 36% max more like 21% averaged out. If it did it would be tonight right before landfall.
See https://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/ai-ri/
jaguars_22 wrote:Man she isn’t wobbling much to the north! She needs to turn soon… gfs shifted a little west again. Is she expected to make a drastic turn to north?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests